Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Software - Application
Medical - Equipment & Services
HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Software - Application | Medical - Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $48K | $27.03B | $5.23B | $174.91B | $7.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $3.20B | $638M | $41.52B | $2.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $909M | $239M | $7.46B | $128M |
| Gross Margin | 13.1% | 75.5% | 89.7% | 77.7% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -45.2% | 28.7% | 37.4% | 21.5% | 4.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.8x | 16.8x | 15.4x | 58.3x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $96M | $12M | $6.74B | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20K | $1.42B | $210M | $7.33B | $229M |
HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare Triangle… (HCTI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) | 100 | 52.4 | -47.6% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 37.4 | -62.6% |
| Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) | 100 | 60.7 | -39.3% |
| Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS) | 100 | 362.4 | +262.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, HCTI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
VEEV has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.72
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 1.3%, current ratio 4.89x
- Beta 0.72, current ratio 4.89x
- Beta 0.72 vs HCTI's 3.25
DOCS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.4%
- PEG 0.21 vs CRM's 1.26
- 37.5% margin vs HCTI's -48.9%
- 20.7% ROA vs HCTI's -60.0%, ROIC 20.0% vs -6.3%
CRM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 58.3x)
- 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
HIMS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 188.5% 10Y total return vs VEEV's 5.1%
- 59.0% revenue growth vs HCTI's -64.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 59.0% revenue growth vs HCTI's -64.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 58.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.5% margin vs HCTI's -48.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs HCTI's 3.25 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -30.6% vs HCTI's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs HCTI's -60.0%, ROIC 20.0% vs -6.3% |
HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories
CRM leads 1 • HIMS leads 1 • HCTI leads 0 • VEEV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.5B annually — 3208.8x HCTI's $13M. DOCS is the more profitable business, keeping 37.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HCTI's -48.9%. On growth, HCTI holds the edge at +44.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $3.2B | $638M | $41.5B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $956M | $250M | $11.4B | $164M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $909M | $239M | $7.5B | $128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $1.4B | $314M | $14.4B | $73M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +75.5% | +89.7% | +77.7% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -45.2% | +28.7% | +37.4% | +21.5% | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -48.9% | +28.4% | +37.5% | +18.0% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -94.7% | +43.7% | +49.2% | +34.7% | +3.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.6% | +16.0% | +9.8% | +12.1% | +28.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.8% | +23.9% | -16.2% | +18.3% | -27.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CRM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.3x trailing earnings, CRM trades at a 58% valuation discount to HIMS's 55.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DOCS offers better value at 0.29x vs CRM's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $47,905 | $27.0B | $5.2B | $174.9B | $7.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $25.7B | $5.0B | $174.3B | $8.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 30.56x | 23.41x | 23.31x | 55.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.76x | 16.80x | 15.44x | 58.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.68x | 0.29x | 1.91x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 28.05x | 21.09x | 19.55x | 46.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 8.46x | 9.16x | 4.21x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.85x | 4.83x | 2.94x | 13.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.10x | 19.60x | 12.14x | 98.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-113 for HCTI. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs HCTI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -112.9% | +13.4% | +24.4% | +12.6% | +23.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.0% | +11.1% | +20.7% | +6.6% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | +12.9% | +20.0% | +10.9% | +10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +13.8% | +22.3% | +11.9% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.11x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$1.3B | -$197M | -$590M | $892M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20,000 | $1.4B | $210M | $7.3B | $229M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $96M | $12M | $6.7B | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.79x | — | — | 44.14x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HIMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HIMS five years ago would be worth $27,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for HCTI. Over the past 12 months, VEEV leads with a -30.6% total return vs HCTI's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HIMS at 33.6% vs HCTI's -96.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.8% | -24.3% | -40.0% | -28.1% | -15.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | -30.6% | -56.2% | -34.4% | -45.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -6.3% | -24.3% | -6.3% | +138.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -33.3% | -51.0% | -13.3% | +173.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +512.1% | -51.0% | +148.6% | +188.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.0% | -2.2% | -8.9% | -2.1% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VEEV and CRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VEEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCTI's 3.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRM currently trades 61.4% from its 52-week high vs HCTI's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.25x | 0.72x | 0.99x | 0.75x | 2.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7410.00 | $310.50 | $76.51 | $296.05 | $70.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $148.05 | $20.55 | $163.52 | $13.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +53.5% | +34.0% | +61.4% | +40.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.4 | 50.6 | 62.2 | 53.0 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 285K | 2.3M | 2.7M | 12.1M | 34.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: VEEV as "Buy", DOCS as "Buy", CRM as "Buy", HIMS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.5% upside for VEEV (target: $280) vs -7.3% for HIMS (target: $26). CRM is the only dividend payer here at 0.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $280.10 | $42.79 | $287.00 | $26.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 42 | 22 | 97 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.66 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +2.3% | +7.2% | +1.2% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
HCTI vs VEEV vs DOCS vs CRM vs HIMS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -64. 8% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) offers the better valuation at 23. 3x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS?
On trailing P/E, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the cheapest at 23. 3x versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Salesforce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS?
Over the past 5 years, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) delivered a total return of +173. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +512. 1% versus HCTI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veeva Systems Inc.
(VEEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Healthcare Triangle, Inc. 's 3. 25β — meaning HCTI is approximately 349% more volatile than VEEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -64. 8% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Doximity, Inc. grew EPS 54. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 8% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -51. 0% for Healthcare Triangle, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus -40. 6% for HCTI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus Salesforce, Inc. 's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 42. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VEEV: 68. 5% to $280. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS?
In this comparison, CRM (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. HCTI, VEEV, DOCS, HIMS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HCTI or VEEV or DOCS or CRM or HIMS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salesforce, Inc.
(CRM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 0. 9% yield, +148. 6% 10Y return). Healthcare Triangle, Inc. (HCTI) carries a higher beta of 3. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRM: +148. 6%, HCTI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HCTI and VEEV and DOCS and CRM and HIMS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HCTI (Healthcare) and VEEV (Healthcare) and DOCS (Healthcare) and CRM (Technology) and HIMS (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HCTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock. CRM pays a dividend while HCTI, VEEV, DOCS, HIMS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.