Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Specialty Business Services
Information Technology Services
HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Specialty Business Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $21M | $149M | $573M | $3.64B | $4.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $160M | $2.10B | $1.21B | $5.32B | $2.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-811K | $-201M | $105M | $373M | $252M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 15.5% | 35.5% | 24.6% | 38.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.7% | 4.3% | 11.6% | 10.8% | 15.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 2.5x | 4.6x | 7.8x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $1.00B | $298M | $1.44B | $404M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $83M | $212M | $260M | $146M |
HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS) | 100 | 47.9 | -52.1% |
| TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| Maximus, Inc. (MMS) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| ExlService Holdings… (EXLS) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, HHS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TTEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (2.5x vs 14.1x)
TASK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 120.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- PEG 0.18 vs MMS's 0.77
- 19.0% revenue growth vs HHS's -13.9%
MMS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +1.1% vs HHS's -42.2%
EXLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.67
- 221.4% 10Y total return vs MMS's 39.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, Low D/E 44.2%, current ratio 2.56x
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 2.56x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs HHS's -13.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.5x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.7% margin vs TTEC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs TTEC's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.1% vs HHS's -42.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs TTEC's -14.2%, ROIC 20.4% vs 6.2% |
HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXLS leads in 3 of 6 categories
MMS leads 1 • HHS leads 0 • TTEC leads 0 • TASK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMS is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 33.3x HHS's $160M. EXLS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTEC's -9.6%. On growth, EXLS holds the edge at +13.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $160M | $2.1B | $1.2B | $5.3B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | $178M | $204M | $645M | $410M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$811,000 | -$201M | $105M | $373M | $252M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $34M | $88M | $372M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +15.5% | +35.5% | +24.6% | +38.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +4.3% | +11.6% | +10.8% | +15.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -9.6% | +8.7% | +7.0% | +11.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +1.6% | +7.3% | +7.0% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.4% | -7.1% | +10.3% | -4.1% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +190.9% | -6.6% | +13.0% | +6.5% | +7.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TTEC and TASK each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.8x trailing earnings, TASK trades at a 72% valuation discount to EXLS's 20.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TASK offers better value at 0.23x vs MMS's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $149M | $573M | $3.6B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $37M | $1.1B | $660M | $4.8B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.27x | -0.77x | 5.79x | 12.10x | 20.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 2.52x | 4.58x | 7.83x | 14.09x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.23x | 1.19x | 0.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.64x | 5.76x | 3.26x | 6.67x | 13.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.07x | 0.48x | 0.67x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 1.31x | 0.99x | 2.31x | 5.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.82x | 7.78x | 9.93x | 16.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXLS delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-100 for TTEC. EXLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEC's 8.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MMS scores 8/9 vs HHS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | -99.6% | +21.2% | +21.8% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | -14.2% | +10.3% | +8.8% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +6.2% | +16.3% | +15.1% | +20.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +7.5% | +16.7% | +17.4% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 8.86x | 0.50x | 0.86x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | $917M | $86M | $1.2B | $257M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $83M | $212M | $260M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $1.0B | $298M | $1.4B | $404M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.69x | -4.22x | 7.12x | 4.93x | 11.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EXLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EXLS five years ago would be worth $15,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $556 for TTEC. Over the past 12 months, MMS leads with a +1.1% total return vs HHS's -42.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EXLS at 1.4% vs TTEC's -51.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.2% | -14.3% | -12.3% | -22.5% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.2% | -21.9% | -28.3% | +1.1% | -31.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.3% | -88.9% | -18.1% | -11.6% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.1% | -94.4% | -67.8% | -20.4% | +60.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.7% | -61.8% | -67.8% | +39.7% | +221.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.9% | -51.9% | -6.4% | -4.0% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MMS and EXLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTEC's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MMS currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs TASK's 34.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.84x | 1.12x | 0.72x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.39 | $5.60 | $18.39 | $100.00 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $1.98 | $5.89 | $60.75 | $26.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +51.6% | +54.6% | +34.6% | +66.7% | +64.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 52.9 | 42.0 | 35.0 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 662K | 736K | 683K | 2.2M |
Analyst Outlook
MMS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TTEC as "Hold", TASK as "Buy", MMS as "Buy", EXLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1016.7% upside for TTEC (target: $34) vs 28.4% for EXLS (target: $40). MMS is the only dividend payer here at 1.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.17 | $13.50 | $110.00 | $40.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 11 | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +4.8% | +12.3% | +6.7% |
EXLS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MMS leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
HHS vs TTEC vs TASK vs MMS vs EXLS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 9% for Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS). TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS?
On trailing P/E, TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is the cheapest at 5. 8x versus ExlService Holdings, Inc. at 20. 4x. On forward P/E, TTEC Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TaskUs, Inc. wins at 0. 18x versus Maximus, Inc. 's 0. 77x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS?
Over the past 5 years, ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) delivered a total return of +60. 0%, compared to -94. 4% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXLS returned +221. 4% versus HHS's -82. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus TTEC Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning TTEC is approximately 177% more volatile than EXLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ExlService Holdings, Inc. (EXLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 9% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TaskUs, Inc.
(TASK) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -13. 9% for Harte Hanks, Inc. (HHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TaskUs, Inc. grew EPS 120. 0% year-over-year, compared to 10. 4% for Maximus, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXLS leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS?
ExlService Holdings, Inc.
(EXLS) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -9. 0% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXLS leads at 15. 0% versus 1. 4% for HHS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXLS leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 18x versus Maximus, Inc. 's 0. 77x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) trades at 2. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for ExlService Holdings, Inc. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEC: 1016. 7% to $34. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS?
In this comparison, MMS (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. HHS, TTEC, TASK, EXLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HHS or TTEC or TASK or MMS or EXLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Maximus, Inc.
(MMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), 1. 8% yield). TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MMS: +39. 7%, TTEC: -61. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HHS and TTEC and TASK and MMS and EXLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (HHS (Communication Services) and TTEC (Technology) and TASK (Technology) and MMS (Industrials) and EXLS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock; EXLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MMS pays a dividend while HHS, TTEC, TASK, EXLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.