Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
Auto - Parts
Auto - Manufacturers
Auto - Recreational Vehicles
HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Recreational Vehicles | Auto - Parts | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Recreational Vehicles |
| Market Cap | $2.64B | $3.80B | $779M | $47.73B | $5.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.32B | $7.27B | $1.48B | $189.86B | $5.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $230M | $-446M | $-300M | $-6.11B | $-137M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 19.6% | 29.7% | 9.2% | 18.0% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | -0.5% | -18.0% | 1.8% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 57.5x | 37.3x | 18.4x | 7.7x | 19.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.05B | $1.54B | $780M | $167.57B | $2.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.09B | $138M | $58M | $23.36B | $275M |
HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harley-Davidson, In… (HOG) | 100 | 110.7 | +10.7% |
| Polaris Inc. (PII) | 100 | 76.8 | -23.2% |
| Fox Factory Holding… (FOXF) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| Ford Motor Company (F) | 100 | 213.3 | +113.3% |
| Brunswick Corporati… (BC) | 100 | 146.8 | +46.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 96.7%, current ratio 2.10x
- Beta 0.96, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.10x
- 5.3% margin vs FOXF's -20.2%
- Beta 0.96 vs BC's 1.69, lower leverage
PII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 29 yrs, beta 1.56, yield 3.9%
- +107.0% vs FOXF's -8.6%
FOXF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -82.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.9%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs HOG's -13.8%
F is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 19.0x)
- 6.2% yield, vs PII's 3.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
BC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 96.4% 10Y total return vs F's 36.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs HOG's -13.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 19.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.3% margin vs FOXF's -20.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs BC's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.2% yield, vs PII's 3.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +107.0% vs FOXF's -8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.4% ROA vs FOXF's -16.5%, ROIC 5.0% vs -24.2% |
HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
F leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOG leads 1 • PII leads 0 • FOXF leads 0 • BC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOG and F each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
F is the larger business by revenue, generating $189.9B annually — 128.2x FOXF's $1.5B. HOG is the more profitable business, keeping 5.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOXF's -20.2%. On growth, BC holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.3B | $7.3B | $1.5B | $189.9B | $5.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $366M | $178M | -$196M | $10.0B | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $230M | -$446M | -$300M | -$6.1B | -$137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $44M | $161M | $12M | $11.9B | $341M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +19.6% | +29.7% | +9.2% | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -0.5% | -18.0% | +1.8% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | -6.1% | -20.2% | -3.2% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +2.2% | +0.8% | +6.3% | +6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | +8.0% | +3.8% | +6.4% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -79.4% | +29.1% | +94.2% | +4.3% | +6.7% |
Valuation Metrics
F leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOG's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BC's 29.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.6B | $3.8B | $779M | $47.7B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $5.2B | $1.5B | $191.9B | $7.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.50x | -8.20x | -1.42x | -5.91x | -38.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 57.47x | 37.25x | 18.42x | 7.72x | 18.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.04x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.29x | 20.20x | — | 22.51x | 29.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 0.53x | 0.53x | 0.25x | 0.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.91x | 4.54x | 1.16x | 1.35x | 3.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.37x | 6.81x | 28.89x | 3.83x | 13.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOG delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-45 for PII. HOG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.97x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to F's 4.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOG scores 7/9 vs F's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | -45.2% | -37.0% | -14.7% | -5.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.4% | -8.6% | -16.5% | -2.1% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | -0.8% | -24.2% | +1.0% | -0.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | -1.0% | -30.9% | +1.4% | -1.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.97x | 1.83x | 1.16x | 4.66x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $1.4B | $722M | $144.2B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.1B | $138M | $58M | $23.4B | $275M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $1.5B | $780M | $167.6B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.87x | -3.26x | -5.17x | 0.93x | 4.34x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
F leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in F five years ago would be worth $13,291 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,158 for FOXF. Over the past 12 months, PII leads with a +107.0% total return vs FOXF's -8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors F at 5.6% vs FOXF's -42.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.4% | +1.9% | +6.6% | -7.6% | +7.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | +107.0% | -8.6% | +24.3% | +79.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.8% | -29.0% | -80.6% | +17.8% | +3.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.8% | -44.6% | -88.4% | +32.9% | -23.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.0% | +4.3% | +7.0% | +36.2% | +96.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.3% | -10.8% | -42.1% | +5.6% | +1.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOG and BC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOG is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BC's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BC currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs FOXF's 59.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.56x | 1.55x | 0.97x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.25 | $75.25 | $31.18 | $14.80 | $90.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.09 | $33.23 | $13.08 | $9.88 | $45.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.6% | +89.1% | +59.6% | +82.3% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 62.2 | 57.0 | 49.3 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.5M | 1.3M | 658K | 42.5M | 886K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PII and F each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HOG as "Hold", PII as "Hold", FOXF as "Buy", F as "Hold", BC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for FOXF (target: $22) vs -12.0% for HOG (target: $21). For income investors, F offers the higher dividend yield at 6.17% vs BC's 2.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.80 | $68.75 | $21.50 | $13.96 | $88.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 27 | 18 | 46 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.0% | +3.9% | — | +6.2% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 29 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.71 | $2.64 | — | $0.75 | $1.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.4% | +0.1% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.5% |
F leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HOG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HOG vs PII vs FOXF vs F vs BC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Factory Holding Corp.
(FOXF) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 8% for Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG). Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (57. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC?
On forward P/E, Ford Motor Company is actually cheaper at 7.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC?
Over the past 5 years, Ford Motor Company (F) delivered a total return of +32.
9%, compared to -88. 4% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BC returned +96. 4% versus HOG's -28. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(HOG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 96β versus Brunswick Corporation's 1. 69β — meaning BC is approximately 75% more volatile than HOG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 97% versus 5% for Ford Motor Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Factory Holding Corp.
(FOXF) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus -13. 8% for Harley-Davidson, Inc. (HOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Harley-Davidson, Inc. grew EPS -19. 2% year-over-year, compared to -82. 5% for Fox Factory Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, F leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC?
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(HOG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -37. 1% for Fox Factory Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOG leads at 8. 6% versus -35. 6% for FOXF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOG leads at 30. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ford Motor Company (F) trades at 7.
7x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Harley-Davidson, Inc. — 49. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOXF: 15. 8% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC?
In this comparison, F (6.
2% yield), PII (3. 9% yield), HOG (3. 0% yield), BC (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. FOXF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is HOG or PII or FOXF or F or BC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ford Motor Company (F) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
97), 6. 2% yield). Fox Factory Holding Corp. (FOXF) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (F: +36. 2%, FOXF: +7. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HOG and PII and FOXF and F and BC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; PII is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FOXF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; F is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HOG, PII, F, BC pay a dividend while FOXF does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.