Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HRZN vs SUNS vs TPVG vs ARCC vs PSEC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
Asset Management
Asset Management
Asset Management
HRZN vs SUNS vs TPVG vs ARCC vs PSEC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | REIT - Residential | Asset Management | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $199M | $103M | $243M | $13.61B | $1.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $40M | $26M | $97M | $3.15B | $-277M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $12M | $-12M | $1.15B | $-94M |
| Gross Margin | 18.0% | 79.9% | 83.5% | 75.7% | 147.0% |
| Operating Margin | -4.0% | 53.4% | 77.9% | 69.7% | 169.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 6.6x | 6.5x | 9.9x | 5.9x |
| Total Debt | $473M | $122M | $469M | $15.99B | $2.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $6M | $20M | $924M | $47M |
HRZN vs SUNS vs TPVG vs ARCC vs PSEC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizon Technology … (HRZN) | 100 | 38.7 | -61.3% |
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.8% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 67.8 | -32.2% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 90.5 | -9.5% |
| Prospect Capital Co… (PSEC) | 100 | 50.6 | -49.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HRZN vs SUNS vs TPVG vs ARCC vs PSEC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HRZN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.70, yield 27.8%
- PEG 0.26 vs TPVG's 6.41
- Beta 0.70, yield 27.8%, current ratio 1.24x
- Beta 0.70 vs PSEC's 0.93
SUNS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 148.1%, EPS growth -5.0%
- 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs PSEC's -159.2%
- 4.6% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 7.2%
TPVG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +19.3% vs HRZN's -23.2%
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 139.2% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 1.71x
PSEC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 8.0% vs ARCC's 3.6%
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 9.9x)
- 169.8% margin vs HRZN's -6.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs PSEC's -159.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 169.8% margin vs HRZN's -6.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs PSEC's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 27.8% yield, vs SUNS's 15.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs HRZN's -23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs TPVG's -1.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 7.2% |
HRZN vs SUNS vs TPVG vs ARCC vs PSEC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSEC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SUNS leads 1 • ARCC leads 1 • HRZN leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSEC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC and PSEC operate at a comparable scale, with $3.1B and -$277M in trailing revenue. PSEC is the more profitable business, keeping 169.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HRZN's -6.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $40M | $26M | $97M | $3.1B | -$277M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $16M | -$22M | $2.0B | -$94M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $12M | -$12M | $1.1B | -$94M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $67M | -$3M | $35M | $1.1B | $553M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +79.9% | +83.5% | +75.7% | +147.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +53.4% | +77.9% | +69.7% | +169.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +46.0% | +50.6% | +41.3% | +169.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +141.5% | -13.0% | -58.7% | +36.3% | -189.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +108.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.6% | -55.6% | -2.3% | -63.9% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PSEC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, HRZN trades at a 58% valuation discount to ARCC's 10.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRZN offers better value at 0.18x vs TPVG's 4.84x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $199M | $103M | $243M | $13.6B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $567M | $219M | $691M | $28.7B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.30x | 8.12x | 4.91x | 10.19x | -2.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.10x | 6.58x | 6.50x | 9.92x | 5.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.18x | — | 4.84x | 0.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.93x | 9.13x | 13.09x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.97x | 3.92x | 2.50x | 4.33x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.60x | 0.54x | 0.68x | 0.93x | 0.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.51x | — | — | 11.92x | 2.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRZN delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-3 for TPVG. SUNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRZN's 1.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRZN scores 5/9 vs SUNS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +6.6% | -3.4% | +8.1% | -2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +4.6% | -1.5% | +3.8% | -1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +6.0% | +7.2% | +5.7% | -6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | +5.4% | +9.4% | +7.5% | -6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.49x | 0.67x | 1.33x | 1.12x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $368M | $116M | $449M | $15.1B | $2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $6M | $20M | $924M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $473M | $122M | $469M | $16.0B | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.60x | 3.53x | -1.02x | 2.98x | -0.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARCC five years ago would be worth $14,704 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,724 for HRZN. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs HRZN's -23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARCC at 10.3% vs HRZN's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -26.7% | -13.4% | -6.3% | -4.9% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -23.2% | -12.3% | +19.3% | +0.4% | -9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.7% | -10.5% | -3.4% | +34.2% | -27.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.8% | -10.5% | -13.5% | +47.0% | -25.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | -10.5% | +93.3% | +139.2% | +38.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.3% | -3.6% | -1.2% | +10.3% | -10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HRZN and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HRZN is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSEC's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARCC currently trades 81.0% from its 52-week high vs HRZN's 53.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.86x | 0.83x | 0.77x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.46 | $11.78 | $7.53 | $23.42 | $3.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.80 | $7.39 | $4.48 | $17.40 | $2.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.3% | +65.4% | +79.5% | +81.0% | +72.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 47.0 | 58.3 | 56.7 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 105K | 504K | 7.5M | 4.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HRZN and SUNS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRZN as "Hold", SUNS as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", ARCC as "Buy", PSEC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 97.8% upside for SUNS (target: $15) vs -9.1% for PSEC (target: $3). For income investors, HRZN offers the higher dividend yield at 27.80% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $15.25 | $8.95 | $21.88 | $2.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 8 | 12 | 32 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +27.8% | +15.3% | +17.1% | +2.0% | +27.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.25 | $1.18 | $1.02 | $0.38 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
PSEC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SUNS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
HRZN vs SUNS vs TPVG vs ARCC vs PSEC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger pick with 148. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -159. 2% for Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC?
On trailing P/E, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the cheapest at 4.
3x versus Ares Capital Corporation at 10. 2x. On forward P/E, Prospect Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 5. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation wins at 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) delivered a total return of +47.
0%, compared to -32. 8% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARCC returned +139. 2% versus SUNS's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
70β versus Prospect Capital Corporation's 0. 93β — meaning PSEC is approximately 32% more volatile than HRZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 149% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is pulling ahead at 148. 1% versus -159. 2% for Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Horizon Technology Finance Corporation grew EPS 756. 3% year-over-year, compared to -475. 0% for Prospect Capital Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC?
Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) is the more profitable company, earning 169.
8% net margin versus -6. 6% for Horizon Technology Finance Corporation — meaning it keeps 169. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSEC leads at 169. 8% versus -4. 0% for HRZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSEC leads at 147. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. 's 6. 41x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Prospect Capital Corporation (PSEC) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 9. 9x for Ares Capital Corporation — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SUNS: 97. 8% to $15. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) offers the highest yield at 27. 8%, versus 2. 0% for Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC).
09Is HRZN or SUNS or TPVG or ARCC or PSEC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
70), 27. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HRZN: +52. 9%, PSEC: +38. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HRZN and SUNS and TPVG and ARCC and PSEC?
These companies operate in different sectors (HRZN (Financial Services) and SUNS (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and ARCC (Financial Services) and PSEC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: HRZN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PSEC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Financial Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 8%
- Dividend Yield > 11.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.