REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $14.65B | $2.29B | $6.82B | $1.90B | $2.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.94B | $2.53B | $2.65B | $986M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $738M | $-215M | $264M | $35M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 53.3% | -4.7% | 17.8% | -6.3% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 11.1% | 19.2% | 5.9% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 24.8x | 27.0x | 127.0x | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $5.64B | $4.26B | $4.29B | $925M | $1.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $554M | $232M | $500M | $109M | $68M |
HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Host Hotels & Resor… (HST) | 100 | 178.5 | +78.5% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 115.7 | +15.7% |
| Ryman Hospitality P… (RHP) | 100 | 316.4 | +216.4% |
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| DiamondRock Hospita… (DRH) | 100 | 177.6 | +77.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.3%
- Lower P/E (19.4x vs 127.0x)
- 12.4% margin vs PK's -8.5%
- +50.9% vs RHP's +19.1%
PK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 12.4% yield, vs RHP's 4.0%
RHP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 162.5% 10Y total return vs HST's 74.8%
- Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 73.13x
- 10.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2%
SHO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.30x
DRH is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 4.4%
- Beta 0.97 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.2% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.4x vs 127.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs PK's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.97 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 12.4% yield, vs RHP's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +50.9% vs RHP's +19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.9% vs 2.2% |
HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PK leads in 1 of 6 categories
HST leads 1 • DRH leads 1 • RHP leads 0 • SHO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HST and RHP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HST is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 6.0x SHO's $986M. HST is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, RHP holds the edge at +13.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $2.5B | $2.7B | $986M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $612M | $799M | $199M | $280M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $738M | -$215M | $264M | $35M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $671M | $448M | $302M | $148M | $161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.3% | -4.7% | +17.8% | -6.3% | +43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +11.1% | +19.2% | +5.9% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | -8.5% | +9.9% | +3.6% | +9.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +17.7% | +11.4% | +15.0% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.9% | -1.3% | +13.2% | +11.0% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | +117.2% | +3.0% | +7.0% | +56.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, HST trades at a 91% valuation discount to SHO's 236.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RHP's 13.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.7B | $2.3B | $6.8B | $1.9B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.7B | $6.3B | $10.6B | $2.7B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.53x | -8.01x | 28.68x | 236.88x | 24.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.43x | 24.80x | 26.97x | 127.00x | 20.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.06x | 11.23x | 13.86x | 12.97x | 11.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.58x | 0.90x | 2.65x | 1.98x | 1.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 0.74x | 5.89x | 1.00x | 1.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | 22.43x | 29.37x | 24.13x | 13.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — RHP and SHO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHP delivers a 23.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. SHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RHP's 3.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DRH scores 7/9 vs RHP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | -6.7% | +23.8% | +1.8% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | -2.6% | +4.3% | +1.2% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +2.2% | +8.2% | +2.0% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +3.1% | +9.0% | +2.5% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 1.38x | 3.54x | 0.48x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.1B | $4.0B | $3.8B | $816M | $1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $554M | $232M | $500M | $109M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.6B | $4.3B | $4.3B | $925M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.07x | -0.01x | 2.06x | 1.58x | 2.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RHP five years ago would be worth $16,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,447 for PK. Over the past 12 months, HST leads with a +50.9% total return vs RHP's +19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HST at 10.9% vs SHO's 2.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.4% | +7.9% | +14.5% | +10.7% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.9% | +21.9% | +19.1% | +21.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.5% | +23.8% | +29.4% | +8.2% | +36.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.0% | -25.5% | +62.7% | -11.5% | +16.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.8% | -10.8% | +162.5% | +10.8% | +48.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | +7.4% | +9.0% | +2.7% | +10.8% |
Risk & Volatility
DRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DRH currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs PK's 91.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.32x | 0.98x | 1.00x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.54 | $12.39 | $109.94 | $10.27 | $10.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.37 | $9.84 | $83.82 | $8.14 | $7.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +91.8% | +98.4% | +97.6% | +99.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 48.3 | 65.2 | 56.9 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.1M | 3.9M | 515K | 1.6M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PK and RHP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HST as "Buy", PK as "Hold", RHP as "Buy", SHO as "Hold", DRH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for RHP (target: $116) vs -6.1% for HST (target: $20). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.38% vs SHO's 1.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $11.50 | $116.20 | $10.50 | $10.39 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 42 | 25 | 18 | 28 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.9% | +12.4% | +4.0% | +1.6% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.04 | $1.41 | $4.33 | $0.16 | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +5.7% | +7.2% |
PK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
HST vs PK vs RHP vs SHO vs DRH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is the stronger pick with 10. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH?
On trailing P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. at 236. 9x. On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH?
Over the past 5 years, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) delivered a total return of +62. 7%, compared to -25. 5% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHP returned +162. 5% versus PK's -10. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DiamondRock Hospitality Company (DRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
97β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 35% more volatile than DRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 4% for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is pulling ahead at 10. 2% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DiamondRock Hospitality Company grew EPS 144. 4% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HST leads at 25. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH?
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHP leads at 18. 9% versus 7. 8% for SHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DRH leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 127. 0x for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — 107. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RHP: 7. 5% to $116. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 4%, versus 1. 6% for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO).
09Is HST or PK or RHP or SHO or DRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
(RHP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 98), 4. 0% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RHP: +162. 5%, PK: -10. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HST and PK and RHP and SHO and DRH?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HST is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RHP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DRH is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.