Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.55B | $5.29B | $1.60B | $3.09B | $6.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.02B | $1.45B | $968M | $627M | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $486M | $458M | $59M | $-398M | $465M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 65.6% | 48.6% | 5.8% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 36.0% | 8.3% | -84.2% | 32.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 10.8x | 11.7x | 10.3x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.34B | $1.20B | $396M | $641M | $921M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $910M | $560M | $380M | $2.54B |
HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hancock Whitney Cor… (HWC) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 149.3 | +49.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 223.3% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- +31.0% vs HOMB's -1.9%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- NIM 3.8% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.82 vs HWC's 1.14
HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
UBSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 28.21x
- PEG 1.88 vs HOMB's 3.55
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.4%, current ratio 28.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs HWC's 1.14 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.0% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
HOMB leads 1 • HWC leads 1 • HOPE leads 0 • UBSI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 3.2x SFNC's $627M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $1.5B | $968M | $627M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $656M | $601M | $84M | -$497M | $590M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $486M | $458M | $59M | -$398M | $465M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $523M | $354M | $147M | $755M | $487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +65.6% | +48.6% | +5.8% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +36.0% | +8.3% | -84.2% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +27.7% | +6.0% | -63.4% | +25.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +29.1% | +15.6% | +71.7% | +26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +26.0% | +35.0% | +42.1% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, HWC trades at a 56% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UBSI offers better value at 2.08x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $5.3B | $1.6B | $3.1B | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $5.6B | $1.4B | $3.4B | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.99x | 13.36x | 27.22x | -7.24x | 13.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.70x | 10.82x | 11.70x | 10.35x | 11.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.39x | — | — | 2.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.65x | 10.12x | 17.18x | — | 7.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.75x | 3.64x | 1.66x | 4.93x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 1.36x | 0.71x | 0.84x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.62x | 12.53x | 10.58x | 6.88x | 12.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HWC delivers a 11.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. UBSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +10.9% | +2.6% | -11.6% | +8.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +2.0% | +0.3% | -1.6% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +7.2% | +2.3% | -9.1% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +9.8% | +0.9% | -4.2% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.19x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $775M | $292M | -$164M | $261M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $910M | $560M | $380M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.2B | $396M | $641M | $921M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 1.44x | 0.17x | -1.01x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HWC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HWC five years ago would be worth $15,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, HWC leads with a +31.0% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HWC at 29.6% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | -3.0% | +15.3% | +14.6% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.0% | -1.9% | +30.4% | +16.7% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.7% | +42.0% | +80.7% | +53.4% | +61.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.2% | +6.6% | -2.0% | -15.4% | +23.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.3% | +58.2% | +18.8% | +25.2% | +52.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +12.4% | +21.8% | +15.3% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOMB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HWC's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 0.82x | 1.10x | 1.02x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.43 | $30.83 | $13.02 | $22.18 | $45.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.89 | $25.68 | $9.44 | $17.00 | $34.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +87.1% | +96.2% | +96.3% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 50.3 | 59.1 | 62.3 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 779K | 1.4M | 902K | 1.2M | 916K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HWC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", UBSI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs HWC's 2.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $77.75 | $32.00 | $14.50 | $22.67 | $46.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 19 | 6 | 9 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.8% | +4.4% | +4.0% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 21 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.82 | $0.75 | $0.55 | $0.85 | $1.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HOMB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HWC vs HOMB vs HOPE vs SFNC vs UBSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI?
On trailing P/E, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) is the cheapest at 12.
0x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Bankshares, Inc. wins at 1. 88x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI?
Over the past 5 years, Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) delivered a total return of +52.
2%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWC returned +223. 3% versus HOPE's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Hancock Whitney Corporation's 1. 14β — meaning HWC is approximately 39% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWC leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 88x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for United Bankshares, Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC).
09Is HWC or HOMB or HOPE or SFNC or UBSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +58. 2%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HWC and HOMB and HOPE and SFNC and UBSI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.