REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Retail
IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $39.18B | $150.14B | $41.26B | $29.52B | $65.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.25B | $11.63B | $6.13B | $3.38B | $6.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $272M | $1.43B | $260M | $974M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 39.1% | -4.3% | 28.4% | 85.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 44.1% | 49.9% |
| Forward P/E | 58.4x | 78.9x | 118.3x | 30.1x | 30.4x |
| Total Debt | $19.05B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $14.97B | $29.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $159M | $5.03B | $741M | $139M | $823M |
IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 511.3 | +411.3% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 422.9 | +322.9% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 248.3 | +148.3% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
| Simon Property Grou… (SPG) | 100 | 350.6 | +250.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 2.3%
- 321.4% 10Y total return vs WELL's 230.2%
WELL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2%
- +43.9% vs EXR's -2.1%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.01 vs IRM's 1.10
EXR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Lower P/E (30.1x vs 118.3x)
- 4.6% yield, vs IRM's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SPG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.96 vs EXR's 6.91
- 72.5% margin vs IRM's 3.8%
- 11.4% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 7.6% vs 2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs EXR's 1.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.1x vs 118.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 72.5% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs IRM's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs IRM's 2.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs EXR's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 7.6% vs 2.5% |
IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories
EXR leads 1 • IRM leads 0 • WELL leads 0 • VTR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 3.4x EXR's $3.4B. SPG is the more profitable business, keeping 72.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $11.6B | $6.1B | $3.4B | $6.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $2.8B | $2.3B | $2.2B | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $272M | $1.4B | $260M | $974M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$625M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $1.8B | $2.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +39.1% | -4.3% | +28.4% | +85.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +44.1% | +49.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +12.3% | +4.2% | +28.8% | +72.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +54.6% | +35.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +40.3% | +22.0% | +9.3% | +13.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +4.8% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
EXR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.3x trailing earnings, SPG trades at a 95% valuation discount to IRM's 268.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPG offers better value at 0.45x vs EXR's 7.00x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39.2B | $150.1B | $41.3B | $29.5B | $65.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58.1B | $166.5B | $53.7B | $44.4B | $94.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 268.78x | 154.17x | 160.70x | 30.46x | 14.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.45x | 78.89x | 118.34x | 30.07x | 30.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 7.00x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.90x | 66.76x | 24.36x | 20.12x | 20.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.68x | 14.08x | 7.07x | 8.74x | 10.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.37x | 3.19x | 2.07x | 9.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 52.72x | 31.34x | 16.14x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPG delivers a 68.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $69 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPG's 4.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs IRM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.5% | +2.1% | +6.7% | +68.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +2.3% | +1.0% | +3.3% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +3.9% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +5.4% | +9.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.05x | 4.47x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.9B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $14.8B | $29.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $159M | $5.0B | $741M | $139M | $823M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.1B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $15.0B | $29.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 0.26x | 1.40x | 2.68x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — IRM and WELL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $37,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,680 for EXR. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs EXR's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs EXR's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.3% | +15.0% | +12.9% | +8.0% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.9% | +43.9% | +33.2% | -2.1% | +31.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +149.0% | +182.2% | +93.0% | +2.9% | +107.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.4% | +212.6% | +80.0% | +16.8% | +98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +321.4% | +230.2% | +67.4% | +106.5% | +32.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.5% | +41.3% | +24.5% | +1.0% | +27.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IRM and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRM currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs EXR's 90.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 0.52x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $131.80 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $155.19 | $208.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.77 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $125.71 | $155.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +97.6% | +98.1% | +90.1% | +97.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.1 | 62.6 | 62.0 | 48.0 | 54.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2.6M | 3.3M | 1.1M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IRM and EXR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRM as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", EXR as "Hold", SPG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.7% upside for EXR (target: $149) vs -2.6% for SPG (target: $197). For income investors, EXR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.64% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.33 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $149.13 | $197.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 34 | 32 | 28 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +4.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.09 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $6.49 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
SPG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). EXR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
IRM vs WELL vs VTR vs EXR vs SPG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) offers the better valuation at 14. 3x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG?
On trailing P/E, Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the cheapest at 14. 3x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 268. 8x. On forward P/E, Extra Space Storage Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Simon Property Group, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 6. 91x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +275.
4%, compared to +16. 8% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +321. 4% versus SPG's +32. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately 11509% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for Simon Property Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 1. 2% for Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -19. 7% for Iron Mountain Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG?
Simon Property Group, Inc.
(SPG) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 5% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 72. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPG leads at 49. 9% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPG leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Simon Property Group, Inc. (SPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus Extra Space Storage Inc. 's 6. 91x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) trades at 30. 1x forward P/E versus 118. 3x for Ventas, Inc. — 88. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXR: 6. 7% to $149. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG?
In this comparison, EXR (4.
6% yield), IRM (2. 3% yield), VTR (2. 1% yield), WELL (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IRM or WELL or VTR or EXR or SPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +67. 4%, SPG: +32. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRM and WELL and VTR and EXR and SPG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. IRM, WELL, VTR, EXR pay a dividend while SPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.