Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $2M | $1.69B | $132M | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $390K | $55M | $114M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-27M | $-164M | $115K | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -171.3% | 99.6% | 35.7% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -52.0% | -237.9% | -17.7% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 1.8x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $46M | $149M | $10M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $24M | $15M | $3M | $1.98B |
ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iterum Therapeutics… (ITRM) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 4.5 | -95.5% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 114.1 | +14.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ITRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 14.8% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.85, current ratio 4.97x
- +8.2% vs ITRM's -96.6%
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 14.1x)
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -59.1%
- Beta 1.33, current ratio 0.75x
- 8.3% margin vs ITRM's -69.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.8% revenue growth vs NKTR's -43.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 14.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs ITRM's -69.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs ITRM's -96.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ITRM's -74.8%, ROIC 8.7% vs -117.8% |
ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • NKTR leads 1 • ITRM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 42646.2x ITRM's $390,000. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ITRM's -69.1%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $390,000 | $55M | $114M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$130M | -$10M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$27M | -$164M | $115,000 | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$20M | -$209M | -$159M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -171.3% | +99.6% | +35.7% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -52.0% | -2.4% | -17.7% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -69.1% | -3.0% | +0.1% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -51.1% | -3.8% | -139.1% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -25.3% | +27.5% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | -4.5% | +85.3% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $1.7B | $132M | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $1.8B | $140M | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | -8.57x | -1102.94x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 1.79x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 30.64x | 1.16x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 15.66x | — | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. NKTR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs ITRM's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -4.0% | — | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -74.8% | -62.8% | +0.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -117.8% | -57.2% | — | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -94.1% | -55.7% | — | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.66x | — | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $21M | $134M | $7M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $24M | $15M | $3M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $46M | $149M | $10M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.61x | -4.74x | 1.11x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IQV five years ago would be worth $7,621 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19 for ITRM. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs ITRM's -96.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs ITRM's -69.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.2% | +92.0% | +16.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.6% | +818.2% | +27.1% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +621.8% | -88.2% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -72.3% | -93.9% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -59.1% | -94.3% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.7% | +93.3% | -51.0% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NKTR and IQV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IQV is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NKTR currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs ITRM's 2.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 1.85x | 2.72x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.28 | $109.00 | $7.34 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.03 | $7.99 | $2.71 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.4% | +76.5% | +51.1% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.6 | 53.4 | 48.8 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36.8M | 991K | 814K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NKTR as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 26.3% for IQV (target: $226).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $132.83 | $7.33 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 11 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ITRM vs NKTR vs AGEN vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) delivered a total return of -23. 8%, compared to -99. 8% for Iterum Therapeutics plc (ITRM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 5% versus ITRM's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 104% more volatile than IQV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 166% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGEN leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -69. 1% for Iterum Therapeutics plc — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -52. 0% for ITRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ITRM or NKTR or AGEN or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+166. 5% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQV: +166. 5%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ITRM and NKTR and AGEN and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.