Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-100.0%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1690.08T
5Y Perf.-59.3%
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.66B
5Y Perf.-78.0%
NTRA
Natera, Inc.

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$27.53B
5Y Perf.+343.0%
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation

Medical - Diagnostics & Research

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.02B
5Y Perf.+20.4%

IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
IVF logoIVF
DBVT logoDBVT
NVAX logoNVAX
NTRA logoNTRA
EXAS logoEXAS
IndustryMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Diagnostics & ResearchMedical - Diagnostics & Research
Market Cap$2M$1690.08T$1.66B$27.53B$20.02B
Revenue (TTM)$7M$0.00$596M$2.50B$3.25B
Net Income (TTM)$-29M$-168M$-88M$-226M$-208M
Gross Margin39.2%84.6%65.2%69.7%
Operating Margin-370.2%-11.2%-13.0%-6.4%
Forward P/E4.0x582.8x
Total Debt$10M$22M$249M$214M$2.52B
Cash & Equiv.$741K$194M$241M$1.08B$956M

IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXASLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

IVF
DBVT
NVAX
NTRA
EXAS
StockMay 20May 26Return
INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF)1000.0-100.0%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)10040.7-59.3%
Novavax, Inc. (NVAX)10022.0-78.0%
Natera, Inc. (NTRA)100443.0+343.0%
Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS)100120.4+20.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DBVT and EXAS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Exact Sciences Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. IVF and NVAX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
IVF
INVO Fertility, Inc.
The Growth Play

IVF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 116.3%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
  • 116.3% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Quality Compounder

DBVT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.

  • 0.3% margin vs IVF's -417.0%
  • +100.5% vs IVF's -99.3%
Best for: quality and momentum
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.
The Income Pick

NVAX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.22
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability
NTRA
Natera, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 18.3% 10Y total return vs EXAS's 16.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 12.5%, current ratio 3.39x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
EXAS
Exact Sciences Corporation
The Defensive Pick

EXAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 0.05, current ratio 2.43x
  • Beta 0.05 vs NVAX's 2.22
  • -3.5% ROA vs IVF's -99.6%, ROIC -3.6% vs -42.2%
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIVF logoIVF116.3% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
ValueNVAX logoNVAXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsDBVT logoDBVT0.3% margin vs IVF's -417.0%
Stability / SafetyEXAS logoEXASBeta 0.05 vs NVAX's 2.22
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+100.5% vs IVF's -99.3%
Efficiency (ROA)EXAS logoEXAS-3.5% ROA vs IVF's -99.6%, ROIC -3.6% vs -42.2%

IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

IVFINVO Fertility, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

DBVTDBV Technologies S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

NVAXNovavax, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
50.0%$685M
Nuvaxovid Sales
45.6%$625M
Supply Sales
4.4%$60M
NTRANatera, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.6%$2.3B
Licensing and other
0.4%$10M
EXASExact Sciences Corporation
FY 2025
Screening
77.9%$2.5B
Precision Oncology
22.1%$717M

IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLEXASLAGGINGDBVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

EXAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

EXAS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.4% (EXAS) to -4.2% (IVF). On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +38.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$7M$0$596M$2.5B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$25M-$112M-$47M-$333M-$41M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$29M-$168M-$88M-$226M-$208M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$8M-$151M-$97M$74M$357M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.2%+84.6%+65.2%+69.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.7%-11.2%-13.0%-6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.2%-14.7%-9.0%-6.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-111.9%-16.3%+3.0%+11.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.6%-79.1%+38.8%+23.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+94.9%+91.5%-102.0%-20.0%+90.4%
EXAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IVF leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Market CapShares × price$2M$1690.08T$1.7B$27.5B$20.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12M$1690.08T$1.7B$26.7B$21.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.01x-0.75x3.98x-127.79x-95.37x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.582.83x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.83x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.37x1.48x11.94x6.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x0.65x15.51x8.24x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF252.31x56.10x
IVF leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

EXAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

EXAS delivers a -8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-5 for IVF. NTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXAS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.7%-130.2%-15.1%-8.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-99.6%-89.0%-7.4%-10.4%-3.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-42.2%-36.1%-3.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-41.6%-145.7%+100.4%-18.3%-4.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.78x0.13x0.13x1.05x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9M-$172M$8M-$862M$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$741,396$194M$241M$1.1B$956M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$22M$249M$214M$2.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-27.64x-189.82x-6.40x-34.29x-5.47x
EXAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for IVF. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs IVF's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 54.1% vs IVF's -94.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-61.8%+3.6%+41.8%-15.1%+3.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-99.3%+100.5%+51.8%+19.5%+97.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+18.1%+35.7%+265.8%+53.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-68.3%-93.7%+114.4%+6.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%-87.1%-89.4%+1834.7%+1669.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-94.4%+5.7%+10.7%+54.1%+15.2%
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs IVF's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.29x1.26x2.22x1.17x0.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$297.60$26.18$11.97$256.36$104.98
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.61$7.53$5.80$131.81$38.81
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+0.6%+75.3%+84.5%+75.8%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.047.461.859.876.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded50K252K4.2M1.4M4.3M
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NVAX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 0.1% for EXAS (target: $105).

MetricIVF logoIVFINVO Fertility, I…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.NTRA logoNTRANatera, Inc.EXAS logoEXASExact Sciences Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.33$18.00$265.63$105.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts15232741
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%0.0%+0.1%
NVAX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

EXAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallExact Sciences Corporation (EXAS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, INVO Fertility, Inc.

(IVF) is the stronger pick with 116. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?

Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.

(NTRA) delivered a total return of +114. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1835% versus IVF's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

05β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning NVAX is approximately 4128% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Natera, Inc. (NTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), INVO Fertility, Inc.

(IVF) is pulling ahead at 116. 3% versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?

Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -139. 3% for INVO Fertility, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -124. 4% for IVF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134.

8% to $46. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

05), +1669% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, NVAX: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between IVF and DBVT and NVAX and NTRA and EXAS?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: IVF is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

IVF

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTRA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EXAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.