Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $2M | $1690.08T | $1.66B | $27.53B | $20.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $0.00 | $596M | $2.50B | $3.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-29M | $-168M | $-88M | $-226M | $-208M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | — | 84.6% | 65.2% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | -370.2% | — | -11.2% | -13.0% | -6.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 4.0x | — | 582.8x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $22M | $249M | $214M | $2.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $741K | $194M | $241M | $1.08B | $956M |
IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| Natera, Inc. (NTRA) | 100 | 443.0 | +343.0% |
| Exact Sciences Corp… (EXAS) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IVF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 116.3%, EPS growth 55.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 116.3% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
DBVT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and momentum.
- 0.3% margin vs IVF's -417.0%
- +100.5% vs IVF's -99.3%
NVAX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.22
- Better valuation composite
NTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 18.3% 10Y total return vs EXAS's 16.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 12.5%, current ratio 3.39x
EXAS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.05, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 0.05 vs NVAX's 2.22
- -3.5% ROA vs IVF's -99.6%, ROIC -3.6% vs -42.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 116.3% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs IVF's -417.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs NVAX's 2.22 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs IVF's -99.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.5% ROA vs IVF's -99.6%, ROIC -3.6% vs -42.2% |
IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXAS leads in 3 of 6 categories
IVF leads 1 • NTRA leads 1 • NVAX leads 1 • DBVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXAS and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $3.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.4% (EXAS) to -4.2% (IVF). On growth, NTRA holds the edge at +38.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $0 | $596M | $2.5B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$25M | -$112M | -$47M | -$333M | -$41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$29M | -$168M | -$88M | -$226M | -$208M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | -$151M | -$97M | $74M | $357M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | — | +84.6% | +65.2% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | — | -11.2% | -13.0% | -6.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | — | -14.7% | -9.0% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -111.9% | — | -16.3% | +3.0% | +11.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +22.6% | — | -79.1% | +38.8% | +23.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +94.9% | +91.5% | -102.0% | -20.0% | +90.4% |
Valuation Metrics
IVF leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $1690.08T | $1.7B | $27.5B | $20.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $1690.08T | $1.7B | $26.7B | $21.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.75x | 3.98x | -127.79x | -95.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 582.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 2.83x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | — | 1.48x | 11.94x | 6.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.65x | — | 15.51x | 8.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 252.31x | 56.10x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXAS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EXAS delivers a -8.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-5 for IVF. NTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EXAS's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXAS scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.7% | -130.2% | — | -15.1% | -8.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -99.6% | -89.0% | -7.4% | -10.4% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -42.2% | — | — | -36.1% | -3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -41.6% | -145.7% | +100.4% | -18.3% | -4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.78x | 0.13x | — | 0.13x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9M | -$172M | $8M | -$862M | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $741,396 | $194M | $241M | $1.1B | $956M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $22M | $249M | $214M | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -27.64x | -189.82x | -6.40x | -34.29x | -5.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTRA five years ago would be worth $21,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for IVF. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs IVF's -99.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTRA at 54.1% vs IVF's -94.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -61.8% | +3.6% | +41.8% | -15.1% | +3.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.3% | +100.5% | +51.8% | +19.5% | +97.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +18.1% | +35.7% | +265.8% | +53.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -68.3% | -93.7% | +114.4% | +6.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.1% | -89.4% | +1834.7% | +1669.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -94.4% | +5.7% | +10.7% | +54.1% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
EXAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EXAS currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs IVF's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.29x | 1.26x | 2.22x | 1.17x | 0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $297.60 | $26.18 | $11.97 | $256.36 | $104.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.61 | $7.53 | $5.80 | $131.81 | $38.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +75.3% | +84.5% | +75.8% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.0 | 47.4 | 61.8 | 59.8 | 76.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 252K | 4.2M | 1.4M | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
NVAX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy", NTRA as "Buy", EXAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 0.1% for EXAS (target: $105).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $18.00 | $265.63 | $105.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 23 | 27 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
EXAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IVF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
IVF vs DBVT vs NVAX vs NTRA vs EXAS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, INVO Fertility, Inc.
(IVF) is the stronger pick with 116. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?
Over the past 5 years, Natera, Inc.
(NTRA) delivered a total return of +114. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for INVO Fertility, Inc. (IVF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTRA returned +1835% versus IVF's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
05β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning NVAX is approximately 4128% more volatile than EXAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Natera, Inc. (NTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 105% for Exact Sciences Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), INVO Fertility, Inc.
(IVF) is pulling ahead at 116. 3% versus 17. 7% for Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTRA leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -139. 3% for INVO Fertility, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -124. 4% for IVF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 134.
8% to $46. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is IVF or DBVT or NVAX or NTRA or EXAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exact Sciences Corporation (EXAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
05), +1669% 10Y return). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXAS: +1669%, NVAX: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between IVF and DBVT and NVAX and NTRA and EXAS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IVF is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTRA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.