Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Financial - Credit Services
Telecommunications Services
JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment | Entertainment | Financial - Credit Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $534M | $374.00B | $192.60B | $3.75B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.54B | $45.18B | $97.26B | $17.17B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.71B | $10.98B | $11.22B | $6.89B | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 80.9% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 61.8% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 32.1% | 29.5% | 15.5% | 43.9% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.5x | 24.8x | 16.5x | 0.5x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $1.65B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $541M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $4.45B | $9.48B |
JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) | 100 | 238.6 | +138.6% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 131.4 | +31.4% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JFIN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.19, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 2.15x
- Beta 1.19, yield 16.9%, current ratio 2.15x
- 16.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- 21.6% ROA vs DIS's 5.6%, ROIC 39.9% vs 6.9%
NFLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs QFIN's 16.1%
- 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0%
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs QFIN's -63.6%
QFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.02 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Lower P/E (0.5x vs 7.4x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.40
- 36.5% margin vs DIS's 11.5%
CMCSA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- Beta 0.21 vs QFIN's 1.20
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs CMCSA's -0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 7.4x), PEG 0.02 vs 0.40 | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs DIS's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs QFIN's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 16.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs QFIN's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.6% ROA vs DIS's 5.6%, ROIC 39.9% vs 6.9% |
JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
JFIN leads 1 • NFLX leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • CMCSA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 19.2x JFIN's $6.5B. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DIS's 11.5%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.5B | $45.2B | $97.3B | $17.2B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.1B | $30.1B | $20.5B | $8.0B | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $11.0B | $11.2B | $6.9B | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $9.5B | $7.1B | $10.8B | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.9% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +61.8% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.1% | +29.5% | +15.5% | +43.9% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +24.3% | +11.5% | +36.5% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +53.5% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +17.6% | +6.5% | — | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.9% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -9.7% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, JFIN trades at a 95% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), QFIN offers better value at 0.11x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $534M | $374.0B | $192.6B | $3.8B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $462M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $3.3B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.69x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 2.15x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.49x | 24.80x | 16.53x | 0.47x | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.12x | 1.06x | — | 0.11x | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.48x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 2.99x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.63x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 1.49x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.57x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 0.56x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.29x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 2.78x | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $10 for DIS. JFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs JFIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.7% | +41.3% | +9.8% | +28.8% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +21.6% | +19.8% | +5.6% | +12.2% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +39.9% | +29.8% | +6.9% | +23.1% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +32.2% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +35.6% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.07x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$489M | $5.4B | $39.2B | -$2.8B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $541M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $4.5B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $1.7B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x | 9.95x | — | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs QFIN's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs CMCSA's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.9% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -22.5% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.2% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -63.6% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.4% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +0.6% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.2% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -19.1% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | +875.3% | +11.8% | +16.1% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.9% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +0.2% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DIS and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QFIN's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs JFIN's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 1.20x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.23 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $47.00 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.71 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $12.30 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.7% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +28.1% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 53.7 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 1.4M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JFIN and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JFIN as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", QFIN as "Buy", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 113.1% upside for QFIN (target: $28) vs 21.5% for CMCSA (target: $32). For income investors, JFIN offers the higher dividend yield at 16.87% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 | $139.50 | $28.15 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 99 | 63 | 4 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +16.9% | — | +0.9% | +9.3% | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $5.67 | — | $1.00 | $8.32 | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +11.6% | +7.5% |
QFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). JFIN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
JFIN vs NFLX vs DIS vs QFIN vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Qfin Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 02x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus JFIN's -56. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Qfin Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning QFIN is approximately 473% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -0. 0% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -18. 0% for Jiayin Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JFIN leads at 48. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 13. 1% for The Walt Disney Company — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus 14. 6% for DIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JFIN leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 02x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 24. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QFIN: 113. 1% to $28. 15.
08Which pays a better dividend — JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA?
In this comparison, JFIN (16.
9% yield), QFIN (9. 3% yield), CMCSA (5. 1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JFIN or NFLX or DIS or QFIN or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, JFIN: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JFIN and NFLX and DIS and QFIN and CMCSA?
These companies operate in different sectors (JFIN (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and QFIN (Financial Services) and CMCSA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. JFIN, DIS, QFIN, CMCSA pay a dividend while NFLX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 6.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.