Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Construction
JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $3.73B | $42.29B | $18.93B | $12.99B | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $518M | $33.35B | $34.13B | $10.97B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $112M | $3.17B | $2.08B | $1.35B | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 92.6% | 22.8% | 17.6% | 25.7% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 28.5% | 11.8% | 7.7% | 15.7% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 260.2x | 13.7x | 14.2x | 10.7x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $394M | $6.03B | $6.32B | $2.92B | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $130M | $2.99B | $3.80B | $1.26B | $182M |
JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The St. Joe Company (JOE) | 100 | 337.9 | +237.9% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
| Lennar Corporation (LEN) | 100 | 145.1 | +45.1% |
| Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) | 100 | 424.2 | +324.2% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JOE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.5%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.7%
- 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
- 21.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0%
- Beta 0.77 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
LEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 2.3%
- 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JOE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
TOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.34 vs LEN's 43.27
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.34 vs 43.27
- 9.3% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 13.4% vs 6.4%
BLDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs TOL's 437.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.5% FFO/revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.34 vs 43.27 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs BLDR's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs BLDR's 1.65, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs JOE's 0.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.9% vs BLDR's -25.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs BLDR's 2.6%, ROIC 13.4% vs 6.4% |
JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JOE leads in 2 of 6 categories
TOL leads 2 • LEN leads 1 • DHI leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JOE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.1B annually — 65.9x JOE's $518M. JOE is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLDR's 2.0%. On growth, JOE holds the edge at +5.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $518M | $33.3B | $34.1B | $11.0B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $194M | $4.0B | $2.8B | $1.8B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $112M | $3.2B | $2.1B | $1.3B | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $201M | $3.5B | $28M | $1.0B | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | +22.8% | +17.6% | +25.7% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +11.8% | +7.7% | +15.7% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +9.5% | +6.1% | +12.3% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +10.5% | +0.1% | +9.4% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | -2.3% | -6.5% | +2.7% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | -13.2% | -52.5% | -1.1% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LEN and TOL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.2x trailing earnings, TOL trades at a 69% valuation discount to JOE's 32.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TOL offers better value at 0.32x vs LEN's 43.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.7B | $42.3B | $18.9B | $13.0B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $45.3B | $21.4B | $14.6B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.52x | 12.62x | 10.99x | 10.16x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 260.20x | 13.71x | 14.24x | 10.75x | 14.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.55x | 1.01x | 43.27x | 0.32x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.64x | 10.02x | 7.43x | 8.12x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.28x | 1.23x | 0.55x | 1.18x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.83x | 1.83x | 1.02x | 1.65x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.01x | 12.88x | 671.74x | 12.66x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TOL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TOL delivers a 16.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for BLDR. DHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLDR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JOE scores 9/9 vs TOL's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.6% | +12.9% | +9.2% | +16.3% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.3% | +8.9% | +6.0% | +9.3% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +12.1% | +7.9% | +13.4% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.8% | +13.1% | +8.8% | +15.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.51x | 0.24x | 0.29x | 0.35x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $264M | $3.0B | $2.5B | $1.7B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $130M | $3.0B | $3.8B | $1.3B | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $394M | $6.0B | $6.3B | $2.9B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.01x | 44.09x | 198.24x | — | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TOL five years ago would be worth $20,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,891 for LEN. Over the past 12 months, JOE leads with a +49.9% total return vs BLDR's -25.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOL at 29.6% vs BLDR's -11.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.0% | +0.8% | -14.9% | +1.5% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.9% | +20.3% | -16.8% | +34.8% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.3% | +38.6% | -18.6% | +117.8% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.9% | +46.7% | -11.1% | +109.0% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +301.3% | +424.3% | +122.6% | +437.2% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.8% | +11.5% | -6.6% | +29.6% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
JOE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JOE is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.65 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JOE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 0.85x | 0.92x | 1.21x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $73.54 | $184.55 | $144.24 | $168.36 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.65 | $114.17 | $83.03 | $100.92 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +79.1% | +60.8% | +81.4% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 49.6 | 48.5 | 49.8 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 2.6M | 2.9M | 1.1M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
LEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: JOE as "Hold", DHI as "Hold", LEN as "Buy", TOL as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.3% upside for BLDR (target: $110) vs 12.3% for DHI (target: $164). For income investors, LEN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs TOL's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $163.86 | $102.14 | $166.75 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 52 | 50 | 46 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.1% | +2.3% | +0.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 11 | 12 | 5 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.58 | $1.60 | $2.02 | $0.97 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +10.1% | +9.6% | +5.0% | +4.7% |
JOE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). TOL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
JOE vs DHI vs LEN vs TOL vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the stronger pick with 27. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) offers the better valuation at 10. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lennar Corporation (LEN) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is the cheapest at 10. 2x versus The St. Joe Company at 32. 5x. On forward P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Toll Brothers, Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus Lennar Corporation's 43. 27x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) delivered a total return of +109. 0%, compared to -11. 1% for Lennar Corporation (LEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +614. 8% versus LEN's +122. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning BLDR is approximately 114% more volatile than JOE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 130% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is pulling ahead at 27. 5% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The St. Joe Company grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JOE leads at 26. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR?
The St.
Joe Company (JOE) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 2. 9% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JOE leads at 28. 5% versus 5. 2% for BLDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JOE leads at 93. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Lennar Corporation's 43. 27x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 260. 2x for The St. Joe Company — 249. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLDR: 38. 3% to $109. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR?
In this comparison, LEN (2.
3% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), JOE (0. 9% yield), TOL (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. BLDR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JOE or DHI or LEN or TOL or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +424. 3% 10Y return). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 65 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +424. 3%, BLDR: +614. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JOE and DHI and LEN and TOL and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (JOE (Real Estate) and DHI (Consumer Cyclical) and LEN (Consumer Cyclical) and TOL (Consumer Cyclical) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JOE is a small-cap high-growth stock; DHI is a mid-cap deep-value stock; LEN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TOL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. JOE, DHI, LEN, TOL pay a dividend while BLDR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.