Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
KPLT
Katapult Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$31M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
UPBD
Upbound Group, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.09B
5Y Perf.-56.7%
PRAA
PRA Group, Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$803M
5Y Perf.-36.7%
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$22.44B
5Y Perf.-32.4%
SEZL
Sezzle Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.36B
5Y Perf.+75.1%

KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
KPLT logoKPLT
UPBD logoUPBD
PRAA logoPRAA
AFRM logoAFRM
SEZL logoSEZL
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Credit ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$31M$1.09B$803M$22.44B$3.36B
Revenue (TTM)$299M$4.74B$1.24B$3.20B$450M
Net Income (TTM)$13M$84M$-305M$382M$148M
Gross Margin-26.9%45.2%99.2%62.6%85.4%
Operating Margin11.3%5.0%33.9%10.2%39.3%
Forward P/E4.5x25.9x62.5x21.2x
Total Debt$79M$1.86B$32M$7.85B$141M
Cash & Equiv.$22M$121M$104M$1.35B$64M

KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

KPLT
UPBD
PRAA
AFRM
SEZL
StockJan 21May 26Return
Katapult Holdings, … (KPLT)1001.7-98.3%
Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD)10043.3-56.7%
PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA)10063.3-36.7%
Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM)10067.6-32.4%
Sezzle Inc. (SEZL)100175.1+75.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SEZL leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Upbound Group, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. KPLT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
KPLT
Katapult Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KPLT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.

  • Beta 0.04, current ratio 0.89x
  • Beta 0.04 vs AFRM's 2.72
Best for: defensive
UPBD
Upbound Group, Inc.
The Value Play

UPBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (4.5x vs 21.2x)
  • 8.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: value and dividends
PRAA
PRA Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.82
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 1.68x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
AFRM
Affirm Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

AFRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
Best for: growth exposure
SEZL
Sezzle Inc.
The Banking Pick

SEZL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 6.9% 10Y total return vs AFRM's -30.7%
  • 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs UPBD's 8.7%
  • 29.6% margin vs PRAA's -24.6%
  • +89.2% vs UPBD's -12.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSEZL logoSEZL66.1% NII/revenue growth vs UPBD's 8.7%
ValueUPBD logoUPBDLower P/E (4.5x vs 21.2x)
Quality / MarginsSEZL logoSEZL29.6% margin vs PRAA's -24.6%
Stability / SafetyKPLT logoKPLTBeta 0.04 vs AFRM's 2.72
DividendsUPBD logoUPBD8.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SEZL logoSEZL+89.2% vs UPBD's -12.2%
Efficiency (ROA)SEZL logoSEZL37.7% ROA vs PRAA's -5.9%, ROIC 52.7% vs 11.2%

KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

KPLTKatapult Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

UPBDUpbound Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Acima
100.0%$2.5B
PRAAPRA Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Reportable Segments
63.7%$1.1B
United States Segment
36.3%$611M
AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Merchant Network
79.2%$883M
Virtual Card Network
20.8%$231M
SEZLSezzle Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
54.0%$117M
Subscription Revenue
46.0%$99M

KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSEZLLAGGINGAFRM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SEZL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

UPBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 15.9x KPLT's $299M. SEZL is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%. On growth, KPLT holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricKPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…UPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…PRAA logoPRAAPRA Group, Inc.AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$299M$4.7B$1.2B$3.2B$450M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$159M$1.0B$431M$533M$197M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$13M$84M-$305M$382M$148M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M$349M-$90M$787M$238M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-26.9%+45.2%+99.2%+62.6%+85.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+11.3%+5.0%+33.9%+10.2%+39.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.3%+1.8%-24.6%+11.9%+29.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.2%+7.4%-7.3%+24.6%+46.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.8%+3.7%-65.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+105.7%+45.2%+2.1%+47.0%
SEZL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 15.0x trailing earnings, UPBD trades at a 97% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KPLT's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.

MetricKPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…UPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…PRAA logoPRAAPRA Group, Inc.AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
Market CapShares × price$31M$1.1B$803M$22.4B$3.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$87M$2.8B$731M$28.9B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-63.00x15.01x-2.68x449.07x26.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.47x25.94x62.49x21.25x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.45x10.27x1.69x209.99x19.27x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.10x0.23x0.65x6.96x7.45x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.58x0.79x7.48x21.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.57x37.29x16.11x
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

SEZL delivers a 90.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPBD's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEZL scores 9/9 vs UPBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricKPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…UPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…PRAA logoPRAAPRA Group, Inc.AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.1%-26.0%+11.2%+90.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.1%+2.7%-5.9%+3.1%+37.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+39.6%+7.3%+11.2%-0.7%+52.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.5%+8.7%-0.9%+70.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954569
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.67x0.03x2.56x0.83x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$57M$1.7B-$72M$6.5B$77M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$22M$121M$104M$1.4B$64M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$79M$1.9B$32M$7.9B$141M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.85x1.41x0.06x1.88x23.74x
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SEZL five years ago would be worth $21,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $230 for KPLT. Over the past 12 months, SEZL leads with a +89.2% total return vs UPBD's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEZL at 2.1% vs KPLT's -23.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricKPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…UPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…PRAA logoPRAAPRA Group, Inc.AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+7.1%+10.4%+19.5%-9.0%+53.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-1.0%-12.2%+57.2%+30.7%+89.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.0%-25.8%-39.3%+464.2%+2962.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.7%-56.3%-46.8%+24.7%+117.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.2%+104.3%-32.2%-30.7%+687.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-23.9%-9.5%-15.3%+78.0%+2.1%
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — KPLT and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KPLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs KPLT's 28.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricKPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…UPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…PRAA logoPRAAPRA Group, Inc.AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.04x1.89x1.82x2.72x2.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.34$28.03$22.55$100.00$186.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.50$15.82$10.25$42.09$49.50
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+28.5%+66.9%+92.6%+67.4%+53.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10048.149.861.263.161.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded20K849K449K5.3M808K
Evenly matched — KPLT and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PRAA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: UPBD as "Buy", PRAA as "Hold", AFRM as "Buy", SEZL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.5% upside for UPBD (target: $40) vs -14.8% for SEZL (target: $85). UPBD is the only dividend payer here at 7.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricKPLT logoKPLTKatapult Holdings…UPBD logoUPBDUpbound Group, In…PRAA logoPRAAPRA Group, Inc.AFRM logoAFRMAffirm Holdings, …SEZL logoSEZLSezzle Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$39.67$26.00$80.77$85.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2013335
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+8.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.9%0.0%+2.5%+1.1%+1.9%
PRAA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SEZL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KPLT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSezzle Inc. (SEZL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the stronger pick with 66. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 7% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (4. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?

On trailing P/E, Upbound Group, Inc.

(UPBD) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, Upbound Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?

Over the past 5 years, Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) delivered a total return of +117. 4%, compared to -97. 7% for Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEZL returned +687. 8% versus KPLT's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Katapult Holdings, Inc.

(KPLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 7324% more volatile than KPLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Upbound Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is pulling ahead at 66. 1% versus 8. 7% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affirm Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?

Sezzle Inc.

(SEZL) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEZL leads at 39. 3% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Upbound Group, Inc.

(UPBD) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 58. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPBD: 111. 5% to $39. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?

In this comparison, UPBD (8.

0% yield) pays a dividend. KPLT, PRAA, AFRM, SEZL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Katapult Holdings, Inc.

(KPLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04)). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KPLT: -97. 2%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between KPLT and UPBD and PRAA and AFRM and SEZL?

These companies operate in different sectors (KPLT (Technology) and UPBD (Technology) and PRAA (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology) and SEZL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: KPLT is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPBD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEZL is a small-cap high-growth stock. UPBD pays a dividend while KPLT, PRAA, AFRM, SEZL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

KPLT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPBD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRAA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 59%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AFRM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SEZL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 33%
  • Net Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform KPLT and UPBD and PRAA and AFRM and SEZL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(KPLT: 9.8% · UPBD: 3.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.