Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $31M | $1.09B | $803M | $22.44B | $3.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $299M | $4.74B | $1.24B | $3.20B | $450M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $84M | $-305M | $382M | $148M |
| Gross Margin | -26.9% | 45.2% | 99.2% | 62.6% | 85.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 5.0% | 33.9% | 10.2% | 39.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.5x | 25.9x | 62.5x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $79M | $1.86B | $32M | $7.85B | $141M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $121M | $104M | $1.35B | $64M |
KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Katapult Holdings, … (KPLT) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) | 100 | 43.3 | -56.7% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 63.3 | -36.7% |
| Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) | 100 | 67.6 | -32.4% |
| Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KPLT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.04, current ratio 0.89x
- Beta 0.04 vs AFRM's 2.72
UPBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.5x vs 21.2x)
- 8.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.82
- Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 1.68x
AFRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
SEZL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs AFRM's -30.7%
- 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs UPBD's 8.7%
- 29.6% margin vs PRAA's -24.6%
- +89.2% vs UPBD's -12.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs UPBD's 8.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.5x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs PRAA's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs AFRM's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 8.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.2% vs UPBD's -12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 37.7% ROA vs PRAA's -5.9%, ROIC 52.7% vs 11.2% |
KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEZL leads in 3 of 6 categories
KPLT leads 1 • PRAA leads 1 • UPBD leads 0 • AFRM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEZL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 15.9x KPLT's $299M. SEZL is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%. On growth, KPLT holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $299M | $4.7B | $1.2B | $3.2B | $450M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $159M | $1.0B | $431M | $533M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $84M | -$305M | $382M | $148M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $349M | -$90M | $787M | $238M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +45.2% | +99.2% | +62.6% | +85.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +5.0% | +33.9% | +10.2% | +39.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +1.8% | -24.6% | +11.9% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.2% | +7.4% | -7.3% | +24.6% | +46.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.8% | +3.7% | — | -65.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +105.7% | +45.2% | +2.1% | — | +47.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KPLT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, UPBD trades at a 97% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KPLT's 0.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $1.1B | $803M | $22.4B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $87M | $2.8B | $731M | $28.9B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -63.00x | 15.01x | -2.68x | 449.07x | 26.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.47x | 25.94x | 62.49x | 21.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.45x | 10.27x | 1.69x | 209.99x | 19.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.23x | 0.65x | 6.96x | 7.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.58x | 0.79x | 7.48x | 21.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.57x | — | 37.29x | 16.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL delivers a 90.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPBD's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEZL scores 9/9 vs UPBD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.1% | -26.0% | +11.2% | +90.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +2.7% | -5.9% | +3.1% | +37.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +39.6% | +7.3% | +11.2% | -0.7% | +52.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.5% | +8.7% | -0.9% | +70.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.67x | 0.03x | 2.56x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $57M | $1.7B | -$72M | $6.5B | $77M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $121M | $104M | $1.4B | $64M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $79M | $1.9B | $32M | $7.9B | $141M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.85x | 1.41x | 0.06x | 1.88x | 23.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEZL five years ago would be worth $21,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $230 for KPLT. Over the past 12 months, SEZL leads with a +89.2% total return vs UPBD's -12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEZL at 2.1% vs KPLT's -23.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +10.4% | +19.5% | -9.0% | +53.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.0% | -12.2% | +57.2% | +30.7% | +89.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | -25.8% | -39.3% | +464.2% | +2962.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -56.3% | -46.8% | +24.7% | +117.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | +104.3% | -32.2% | -30.7% | +687.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.9% | -9.5% | -15.3% | +78.0% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KPLT and PRAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KPLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs KPLT's 28.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | 1.89x | 1.82x | 2.72x | 2.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.34 | $28.03 | $22.55 | $100.00 | $186.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.50 | $15.82 | $10.25 | $42.09 | $49.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.5% | +66.9% | +92.6% | +67.4% | +53.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.1 | 49.8 | 61.2 | 63.1 | 61.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 849K | 449K | 5.3M | 808K |
Analyst Outlook
PRAA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: UPBD as "Buy", PRAA as "Hold", AFRM as "Buy", SEZL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 111.5% upside for UPBD (target: $40) vs -14.8% for SEZL (target: $85). UPBD is the only dividend payer here at 7.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.67 | $26.00 | $80.77 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 20 | 13 | 33 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +8.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.50 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | +2.5% | +1.1% | +1.9% |
SEZL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KPLT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KPLT vs UPBD vs PRAA vs AFRM vs SEZL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the stronger pick with 66. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 7% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (4. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?
On trailing P/E, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, Upbound Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?
Over the past 5 years, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) delivered a total return of +117. 4%, compared to -97. 7% for Katapult Holdings, Inc. (KPLT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEZL returned +687. 8% versus KPLT's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AFRM is approximately 7324% more volatile than KPLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Upbound Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is pulling ahead at 66. 1% versus 8. 7% for Upbound Group, Inc. (UPBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Affirm Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 109. 0% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?
Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEZL leads at 39. 3% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upbound Group, Inc.
(UPBD) trades at 4. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 58. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPBD: 111. 5% to $39. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL?
In this comparison, UPBD (8.
0% yield) pays a dividend. KPLT, PRAA, AFRM, SEZL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KPLT or UPBD or PRAA or AFRM or SEZL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04)). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KPLT: -97. 2%, AFRM: -30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KPLT and UPBD and PRAA and AFRM and SEZL?
These companies operate in different sectors (KPLT (Technology) and UPBD (Technology) and PRAA (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology) and SEZL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KPLT is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPBD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEZL is a small-cap high-growth stock. UPBD pays a dividend while KPLT, PRAA, AFRM, SEZL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.