KW vs RMR vs CWK vs JLL

For growth investors, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is the stronger pick with 11.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). The RMR Group Inc. (RMR) offers the better valuation at 18. 8x trailing P/E (26. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the cheapest at 18. 8x versus Cushman & Wakefield plc at 36. 4x. On forward P/E, Cushman & Wakefield plc is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) delivered a total return of +64.

8%, compared to -27. 2% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. (KW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JLL returned +191. 8% versus CWK's -22. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Cushman & Wakefield plc's 1. 90β — meaning CWK is approximately 194% more volatile than RMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is pulling ahead at 11.

4% versus -22. 0% for The RMR Group Inc. (RMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kennedy-Wilson Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 50. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 1% for Cushman & Wakefield plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, JLL leads at 7. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is the more profitable company, earning 3.

0% net margin versus 0. 9% for Cushman & Wakefield plc — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KW leads at 10. 4% versus 4. 5% for CWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JLL leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) trades at 9.

6x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for The RMR Group Inc. — 16. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMR: 65. 1% to $32. 00.

In this comparison, RMR (9.

4% yield), KW (4. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CWK, JLL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The RMR Group Inc.

(RMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 65), 9. 4% yield). Cushman & Wakefield plc (CWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RMR: +57. 5%, CWK: -22. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: KW is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RMR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CWK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JLL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KW, RMR pay a dividend while CWK, JLL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.