REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $8.28B | $3.41B | $3.23B | $8.93B | $29.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.36B | $2.60B | $750M | $1.13B | $3.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-100M | $-115M | $89M | $327M | $974M |
| Gross Margin | 47.7% | 23.9% | 28.4% | 5.8% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 0.3% | 28.2% | 29.5% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 79.6x | 27.7x | 30.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $4.50B | $3.43B | $3.53B | $14.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $66M | $137M | $24M | $6M | $139M |
LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lineage, Inc. (LINE) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
| Americold Realty Tr… (COLD) | 100 | 40.1 | -59.9% |
| National Storage Af… (NSA) | 100 | 98.4 | -1.6% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 6.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, COLD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NSA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 178.4% 10Y total return vs EXR's 106.5%
- +16.9% vs COLD's -31.1%
CUBE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 5.3%
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.6%
- PEG 2.42 vs NSA's 13.91
- 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs COLD's -2.4%
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.52 vs LINE's 1.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% FFO/revenue growth vs COLD's -2.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.7x vs 30.1x), PEG 2.42 vs 6.91 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.9% margin vs COLD's -4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs LINE's 1.24 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs COLD's -31.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs COLD's -1.4%, ROIC 5.5% vs 0.1% |
LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXR leads in 1 of 6 categories
LINE leads 1 • CUBE leads 1 • NSA leads 1 • COLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EXR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LINE is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 7.1x NSA's $750M. CUBE is the more profitable business, keeping 28.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COLD's -4.4%. On growth, EXR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $2.6B | $750M | $1.1B | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $375M | $387M | $597M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$100M | -$115M | $89M | $327M | $974M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $196M | -$205M | $297M | $611M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.7% | +23.9% | +28.4% | +5.8% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +0.3% | +28.2% | +29.5% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | -4.4% | +11.9% | +28.9% | +28.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -7.9% | +39.6% | +54.0% | +54.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | -1.2% | -1.6% | +3.3% | +9.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.5% | -138.5% | +60.0% | -7.7% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LINE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.8x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 55% valuation discount to NSA's 59.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 2.35x vs NSA's 10.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.3B | $3.4B | $3.2B | $8.9B | $29.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.0B | $7.8B | $6.6B | $12.5B | $44.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -84.88x | -29.95x | 59.85x | 26.83x | 30.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 79.62x | 27.65x | 30.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 10.46x | 2.35x | 7.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 20.75x | 14.18x | 17.62x | 20.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.55x | 1.31x | 4.29x | 7.95x | 8.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.17x | 2.09x | 3.23x | 2.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 42.27x | — | 10.78x | 15.75x | 16.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CUBE delivers a 11.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-4 for COLD. LINE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSA's 2.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSA scores 5/9 vs COLD's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.1% | -3.9% | +5.7% | +11.7% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | -1.4% | +1.8% | +4.9% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +0.1% | +4.1% | +5.5% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +0.1% | +5.9% | +7.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.20x | 1.54x | 2.23x | 1.27x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $4.4B | $3.4B | $3.5B | $14.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $66M | $137M | $24M | $6M | $139M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $4.5B | $3.4B | $3.5B | $15.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.94x | — | 1.73x | 3.90x | 2.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CUBE five years ago would be worth $11,718 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,256 for COLD. Over the past 12 months, NSA leads with a +16.9% total return vs COLD's -31.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NSA at 8.6% vs COLD's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | -5.6% | +52.3% | +13.6% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.8% | -31.1% | +16.9% | -3.6% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -52.1% | +28.2% | -1.6% | +2.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | -57.4% | +16.4% | +17.2% | +16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.4% | +6.9% | +178.4% | +73.8% | +106.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.9% | -21.7% | +8.6% | -0.5% | +1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NSA and EXR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EXR is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LINE's 1.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NSA currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs COLD's 61.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 0.81x | 0.81x | 0.53x | 0.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.72 | $19.40 | $44.02 | $44.13 | $155.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.33 | $10.10 | $27.43 | $35.09 | $125.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +61.8% | +95.2% | +88.8% | +90.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 46.3 | 53.7 | 49.8 | 48.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 988K | 3.9M | 1.8M | 2.2M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LINE and CUBE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LINE as "Hold", COLD as "Buy", NSA as "Hold", CUBE as "Hold", EXR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.6% upside for COLD (target: $13) vs -20.4% for NSA (target: $33). For income investors, LINE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.45% vs EXR's 4.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.80 | $13.25 | $33.33 | $41.50 | $149.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 19 | 19 | 29 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.5% | — | +5.4% | +5.3% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.36 | — | $2.28 | $2.08 | $6.49 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.5% |
EXR leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). LINE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LINE vs COLD vs NSA vs CUBE vs EXR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger pick with 5.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 26. 8x trailing P/E (27. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR?
On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 26.
8x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust at 59. 9x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 27. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 2. 42x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 13. 91x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR?
Over the past 5 years, CubeSmart (CUBE) delivered a total return of +17.
2%, compared to -57. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NSA returned +178. 4% versus LINE's -50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Lineage, Inc. 's 1. 24β — meaning LINE is approximately 139% more volatile than EXR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lineage, Inc. (LINE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 2% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CubeSmart (CUBE) is pulling ahead at 5.
3% versus -2. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lineage, Inc. grew EPS 88. 4% year-over-year, compared to -40. 7% for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXR leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR?
CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
7% net margin versus -4. 4% for Americold Realty Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXR leads at 44. 1% versus 0. 3% for COLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSA leads at 46. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 42x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 13. 91x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 27. 7x forward P/E versus 79. 6x for National Storage Affiliates Trust — 52. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COLD: 10. 6% to $13. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR?
In this comparison, LINE (6.
5% yield), NSA (5. 4% yield), CUBE (5. 3% yield), EXR (4. 6% yield) pay a dividend. COLD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LINE or COLD or NSA or CUBE or EXR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 4. 6% yield, +106. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXR: +106. 5%, COLD: +6. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LINE and COLD and NSA and CUBE and EXR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LINE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; COLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NSA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. LINE, NSA, CUBE, EXR pay a dividend while COLD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.