LPSN vs MANH vs AMZN vs NOW vs MSFT

For growth investors, ServiceNow, Inc.

(NOW) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.

9x versus ServiceNow, Inc. at 56. 0x. On forward P/E, ServiceNow, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ServiceNow, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.

5%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +787. 7% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

89β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 131% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ServiceNow, Inc.

(NOW) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LivePerson, Inc. grew EPS 45. 4% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOW leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NOW leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ServiceNow, Inc. (NOW) trades at 22. 5x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NOW: 61. 9% to $151. 52.

In this comparison, MSFT (0.

8% yield) pays a dividend. LPSN, MANH, AMZN, NOW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

89), 0. 8% yield, +787. 7% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +787. 7%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LPSN (Technology) and MANH (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and NOW (Technology) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LPSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; NOW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while LPSN, MANH, AMZN, NOW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.