Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.34B | $825M | $616.45B | $145.00B | $40.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $345M | $40.00B | $12.37B | $33.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-693M | $-28M | $22.24B | $1.33B | $5.06B |
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | 51.5% | 80.4% | 48.0% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | -58.5% | -9.8% | 60.0% | 13.3% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 20.0x | 20.8x | 24.6x | 60.9x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $25M | $25.17B | $188M | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $558M | $162M | $20.15B | $1.53B | $8.05B |
LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lightspeed Commerce… (LSPD) | 100 | 11.4 | -88.6% |
| Riskified Ltd. (RSKD) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 130.4 | +30.4% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 74.5 | -25.5% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 16.8 | -83.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSPD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RSKD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 8.5%, current ratio 5.03x
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- 50.1% margin vs LSPD's -58.0%
- Beta 0.68 vs SHOP's 2.64
SHOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs V's 329.1%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3%
- +18.2% vs PYPL's -32.3%
PYPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.08
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs PYPL's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs LSPD's -58.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs PYPL's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.2% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs LSPD's -41.3%, ROIC 29.2% vs -36.8% |
LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 4 of 6 categories
PYPL leads 1 • SHOP leads 1 • LSPD leads 0 • RSKD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 116.1x RSKD's $345M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LSPD's -58.0%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $345M | $40.0B | $12.4B | $33.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$562M | -$27M | $27.6B | $1.7B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$693M | -$28M | $22.2B | $1.3B | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $31M | $34M | $21.2B | $2.1B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | +51.5% | +80.4% | +48.0% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.5% | -9.8% | +60.0% | +13.3% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -58.0% | -8.0% | +50.1% | +10.8% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +9.9% | +53.9% | +17.2% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | +6.2% | — | +34.3% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.2% | +2.5% | +35.3% | +15.1% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 93% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PYPL offers better value at 0.97x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $825M | $616.4B | $145.0B | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $801M | $687M | $621.5B | $143.7B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.25x | -26.81x | 31.50x | 118.87x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.04x | 20.80x | 24.59x | 60.91x | 8.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.99x | 4.06x | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 24.65x | 95.83x | 6.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 2.39x | 15.41x | 12.55x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 2.58x | 16.66x | 10.82x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 24.94x | 28.57x | 72.25x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $-46 for LSPD. LSPD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to V's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PYPL scores 8/9 vs LSPD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -46.1% | -8.4% | +58.9% | +10.5% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.3% | -6.3% | +22.7% | +9.0% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -36.8% | -22.2% | +29.2% | +9.4% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.9% | -7.6% | +36.2% | +11.4% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.08x | 0.66x | 0.01x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$541M | -$137M | $5.0B | -$1.3B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $558M | $162M | $20.2B | $1.5B | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $25M | $25.2B | $188M | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -510.59x | — | 26.72x | — | 19.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHOP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in V five years ago would be worth $14,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,561 for LSPD. Over the past 12 months, SHOP leads with a +18.2% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHOP at 20.2% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.7% | +0.3% | -7.1% | -28.9% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.3% | +2.0% | -7.4% | +18.2% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.0% | +2.2% | +41.2% | +73.6% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.4% | -81.4% | +42.6% | +0.8% | -81.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.3% | -81.4% | +329.1% | +4123.0% | +17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.5% | +0.7% | +12.2% | +20.2% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
V is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. V currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 1.05x | 0.68x | 2.64x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.34 | $5.68 | $375.51 | $182.19 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.37 | $3.70 | $293.89 | $88.14 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.2% | +84.9% | +85.6% | +61.3% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 63.8 | 53.3 | 34.7 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 831K | 763K | 6.9M | 8.7M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LSPD as "Buy", RSKD as "Buy", V as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). For income investors, V offers the higher dividend yield at 0.73% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.30 | $5.75 | $362.45 | $164.75 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 11 | 61 | 63 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.7% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 15 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.36 | — | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.9% | +12.9% | +2.2% | 0.0% | +14.8% |
V leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PYPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LSPD vs RSKD vs V vs SHOP vs PYPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PayPal Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 98x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, Visa Inc.
(V) delivered a total return of +42. 6%, compared to -84. 4% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus RSKD's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Visa Inc.
(V) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 289% more volatile than V relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lightspeed Commerce Inc. (LSPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 66% for Visa Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus 4. 3% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PayPal Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to -305. 6% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -62. 0% for Lightspeed Commerce Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -64. 6% for LSPD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 52. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL?
In this comparison, V (0.
7% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. LSPD, RSKD, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LSPD or RSKD or V or SHOP or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +329. 1% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +329. 1%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LSPD and RSKD and V and SHOP and PYPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (LSPD (Technology) and RSKD (Technology) and V (Financial Services) and SHOP (Technology) and PYPL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LSPD is a small-cap high-growth stock; RSKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. V pays a dividend while LSPD, RSKD, SHOP, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.