REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $10.77B | $8.18B | $8.44B | $130.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $347M | $737M | $744M | $996M | $8.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $94M | $293M | $342M | $212M | $3.21B |
| Gross Margin | -17.1% | 36.1% | 47.0% | 61.7% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 40.3% | 38.3% | 54.1% | 47.0% |
| Forward P/E | 742.6x | 35.5x | 29.5x | 30.4x | 40.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.37B | $1.75B | $2.57B | $3.50B | $31.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $170M | $1M | $78M | $166M | $1.32B |
LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) | 100 | 106.5 | +6.5% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 172.4 | +72.4% |
| First Industrial Re… (FR) | 100 | 163.0 | +63.0% |
| Rexford Industrial … (REXR) | 100 | 89.3 | -10.7% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LXP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 66.9%, current ratio 85.31x
- Beta 0.54, yield 5.4%, current ratio 85.31x
- 5.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FR's 2.8%
EGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 287.0% 10Y total return vs PLD's 263.8%
- 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LXP's -2.3%
- Beta 0.52 vs REXR's 0.88
FR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (29.5x vs 40.8x)
- 46.0% margin vs REXR's 21.3%
- 6.1% ROA vs REXR's 1.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.4%
REXR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.76 vs FR's 7.20
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +37.1% vs REXR's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs LXP's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (29.5x vs 40.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs REXR's 21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs REXR's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FR's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.1% vs REXR's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs REXR's 1.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.4% |
LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FR leads in 2 of 6 categories
REXR leads 1 • EGP leads 1 • LXP leads 0 • PLD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 25.2x LXP's $347M. FR is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REXR's 21.3%. On growth, EGP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $347M | $737M | $744M | $996M | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $517M | $477M | $840M | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $94M | $293M | $342M | $212M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $162M | $418M | $483M | $209M | $5.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | +36.1% | +47.0% | +61.7% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +40.3% | +38.3% | +54.1% | +47.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.0% | +39.7% | +46.0% | +21.3% | +36.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.6% | +56.7% | +64.9% | +21.0% | +59.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.3% | +10.2% | +9.9% | -0.9% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -110.2% | +55.3% | +2.0% | -2.2% | -24.1% |
Valuation Metrics
REXR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 28.4x trailing earnings, LXP trades at a 31% valuation discount to REXR's 41.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.24x vs FR's 8.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $10.8B | $8.2B | $8.4B | $130.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.3B | $12.5B | $10.7B | $11.8B | $160.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.44x | 41.15x | 33.01x | 41.34x | 34.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 742.61x | 35.48x | 29.49x | 30.39x | 40.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.42x | 8.06x | 3.75x | 3.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.29x | 24.83x | 21.66x | 16.91x | 22.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.71x | 14.93x | 11.26x | 8.42x | 15.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 3.06x | 2.96x | 0.94x | 2.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.63x | 26.61x | 71.23x | 40.46x | 26.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $2 for REXR. REXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FR's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LXP scores 6/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.6% | +8.4% | +12.4% | +2.3% | +5.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | +5.5% | +6.1% | +1.6% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +2.4% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +5.6% | +6.1% | +3.1% | +4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 0.50x | 0.93x | 0.40x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $1.8B | $2.5B | $3.3B | $30.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $170M | $1M | $78M | $166M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.4B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $3.5B | $31.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.00x | 8.68x | 4.27x | 3.09x | 5.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGP five years ago would be worth $14,822 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,980 for REXR. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +37.1% total return vs REXR's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGP at 8.1% vs REXR's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +12.3% | +7.5% | -7.8% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.3% | +23.8% | +30.1% | +9.0% | +37.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.6% | +26.5% | +22.2% | -28.5% | +19.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +48.2% | +42.3% | -20.2% | +39.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.2% | +287.0% | +207.2% | +138.1% | +263.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.3% | +8.1% | +6.9% | -10.6% | +6.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LXP and EGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REXR's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LXP currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs REXR's 80.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.52x | 0.68x | 0.88x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.52 | $203.63 | $64.62 | $44.38 | $145.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.20 | $159.37 | $47.36 | $32.14 | $103.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +98.4% | +95.5% | +80.1% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.5 | 54.6 | 48.6 | 47.5 | 49.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 544K | 339K | 930K | 2.4M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LXP and FR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LXP as "Buy", EGP as "Hold", FR as "Buy", REXR as "Hold", PLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.5% upside for REXR (target: $43) vs -1.5% for LXP (target: $51). For income investors, LXP offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs PLD's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $204.73 | $65.00 | $42.50 | $144.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 33 | 29 | 21 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.4% | +2.8% | +2.8% | +5.0% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.80 | $5.67 | $1.75 | $1.77 | $3.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.0% | +0.0% |
FR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). REXR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LXP vs EGP vs FR vs REXR vs PLD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (742. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD?
On trailing P/E, LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) is the cheapest at 28.
4x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. at 41. 3x. On forward P/E, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. wins at 2. 76x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 20x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD?
Over the past 5 years, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) delivered a total return of +48. 2%, compared to -20. 2% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGP returned +287. 0% versus LXP's +74. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning REXR is approximately 68% more volatile than EGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 93% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -2. 3% for LXP Industrial Trust (LXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LXP Industrial Trust grew EPS 180. 0% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 21. 1% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 14. 0% for LXP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REXR leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 76x versus First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. 's 7. 20x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) trades at 29. 5x forward P/E versus 742. 6x for LXP Industrial Trust — 713. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REXR: 19. 5% to $42. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
LXP Industrial Trust (LXP) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is LXP or EGP or FR or REXR or PLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 8% yield, +287. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGP: +287. 0%, REXR: +138. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LXP and EGP and FR and REXR and PLD?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LXP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REXR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.