Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Advertising Agencies
MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $512M | $3.92B | $2.47B | $761M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.16B | $901M | $959M | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $39M | $94M | $-51M | $-30M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 44.4% | 11.3% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.7% | 12.1% | -3.8% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 30.8x | 54.0x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $155M | $303M | $186M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $47M | $766M | $98M | $101M |
MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX) | 100 | 26.9 | -73.1% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 255.1 | +155.1% |
| Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR) | 100 | 319.9 | +219.9% |
| QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) | 100 | 82.5 | -17.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and stability.
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.4x)
- Beta 1.01 vs ICHR's 3.93
- 12.3% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 77.1% vs 2.8%
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 3.24, yield 0.2%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs ICHR's 6.3%
- Beta 3.24, yield 0.2%, current ratio 3.27x
- 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +329.1% vs QNST's -26.9%
QNST is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.51x
- 78.3% revenue growth vs ICHR's 11.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.3% revenue growth vs ICHR's 11.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs ICHR's 3.93 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +329.1% vs QNST's -26.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 77.1% vs 2.8% |
MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACMR leads in 3 of 6 categories
MAX leads 1 • ICHR leads 0 • QNST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QNST and ACMR operate at a comparable scale, with $1.2B and $901M in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, QNST holds the edge at +28.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $901M | $959M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $103M | $126M | -$11M | $26M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $39M | $94M | -$51M | -$30M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | -$69M | -$17M | $99M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +44.4% | +11.3% | +10.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +12.1% | -3.8% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +10.4% | -5.3% | -2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -7.6% | -1.7% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.3% | +9.4% | +4.7% | +28.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.0% | -76.1% | +46.2% | +59.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.8x trailing earnings, MAX trades at a 86% valuation discount to QNST's 165.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAX's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $512M | $3.9B | $2.5B | $761M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $620M | $3.5B | $2.6B | $671M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.79x | 43.21x | -46.25x | 165.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.41x | 30.81x | 53.98x | 10.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.22x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.61x | 27.49x | — | 21.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 4.35x | 2.61x | 0.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.06x | 3.67x | 3.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.85x | — | — | 9.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MAX and ACMR and QNST each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACMR delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-11 for QNST. QNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICHR's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.1% | -7.5% | -11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.3% | +3.9% | -5.2% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +77.1% | +7.0% | -3.9% | +2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +42.8% | +6.6% | -4.7% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x | 0.28x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $108M | -$463M | $87M | -$91M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $47M | $766M | $98M | $101M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $155M | $303M | $186M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.99x | 20.44x | -5.97x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,277 for MAX. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs QNST's -26.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs MAX's 16.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.3% | +31.9% | +249.0% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.4% | +195.6% | +329.1% | -26.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.2% | +487.9% | +151.1% | +81.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.2% | +133.4% | +28.9% | -28.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -70.9% | +3065.8% | +629.1% | +288.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +80.5% | +35.9% | +21.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAX and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAX is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs MAX's 66.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 3.17x | 3.78x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.87 | $71.65 | $72.87 | $18.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.14 | $19.26 | $13.12 | $10.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.9% | +82.6% | +97.7% | +72.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 60.7 | 66.9 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 647K | 1.2M | 795K | 673K |
Analyst Outlook
ACMR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAX as "Buy", ACMR as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", QNST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.7% upside for ACMR (target: $75) vs -23.3% for ICHR (target: $55). ACMR is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.25 | $75.00 | $54.60 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 | 14 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.2% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ACMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MAX vs ACMR vs ICHR vs QNST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST?
On trailing P/E, MediaAlpha, Inc.
(MAX) is the cheapest at 23. 8x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 165. 6x. On forward P/E, MediaAlpha, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST?
Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -77. 2% for MediaAlpha, Inc. (MAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus MAX's -71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediaAlpha, Inc.
(MAX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 78β — meaning ICHR is approximately 298% more volatile than MAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 28% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus 11. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: QuinStreet, Inc. grew EPS 114. 2% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAX leads at 34. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST?
ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACMR leads at 12. 1% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, MediaAlpha, Inc.
(MAX) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 54. 0x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 45. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACMR: 26. 7% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST?
In this comparison, ACMR (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MAX, ICHR, QNST do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAX or ACMR or ICHR or QNST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MediaAlpha, Inc.
(MAX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAX: -71. 4%, ACMR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAX and ACMR and ICHR and QNST?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAX (Communication Services) and ACMR (Technology) and ICHR (Technology) and QNST (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QNST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.