MGEE vs CWCO vs OTTR vs MSEX vs NEE

For growth investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the stronger pick with 11. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the cheapest at 13.

4x versus NextEra Energy, Inc. at 28. 4x. On forward P/E, Otter Tail Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Otter Tail Corporation wins at 0. 69x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.

Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -28. 4% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +266. 0% versus MSEX's +62. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

12β versus Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. 's 0. 76β — meaning CWCO is approximately -712% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is pulling ahead at 11. 0% versus -2. 0% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MGE Energy, Inc. grew EPS 11. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NextEra Energy, Inc.

(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus 13. 9% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 22. 9% for MGEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGEE leads at 97. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 69x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 15. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEE: 5. 2% to $98. 13.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 4% for Otter Tail Corporation (OTTR).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

12), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, CWCO: +155. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MGEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OTTR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.