Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $115M | $175M | $2.35B | $1.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $166M | $867M | $656M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $-13M | $169M | $71M |
| Gross Margin | 60.3% | 26.7% | 72.1% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | 23.6% | -11.0% | 25.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 11.3x | 9.2x | 10.8x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $300M | $327M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $14M | $185M | $135M |
MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MGYR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 26.8%
- 125.8% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- PEG 0.35 vs OCFC's 3.57
BCBP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 6.1%
- Beta 0.85, yield 6.1%, current ratio 255.40x
- Lower P/E (9.2x vs 9.9x)
- 6.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
NBTB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
OCFC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs BCBP's -15.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.2x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCBP leads 1 • MGYR leads 1 • OCFC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 14.8x MGYR's $58M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BCBP's -7.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $166M | $867M | $656M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | -$18M | $241M | $103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | -$13M | $169M | $71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $34M | $225M | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.3% | +26.7% | +72.1% | +54.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.6% | -11.0% | +25.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | -7.5% | +19.5% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.8% | +20.9% | +25.2% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.5% | -5.6% | +39.5% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BCBP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.3x trailing earnings, MGYR trades at a 30% valuation discount to OCFC's 16.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $115M | $175M | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $156M | $462M | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.33x | -12.02x | 13.53x | 16.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.18x | 10.80x | 9.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | — | 1.92x | 5.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | — | 10.35x | 27.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 1.05x | 2.71x | 1.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 0.57x | 1.21x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.67x | 5.03x | 10.75x | 13.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BCBP. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BCBP's 0.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGYR scores 7/9 vs BCBP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | -4.0% | +9.5% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | -0.4% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | -1.9% | +7.9% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | -0.9% | +2.4% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.99x | 0.17x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | $287M | $142M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $14M | $185M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $300M | $327M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | -0.23x | 1.05x | 0.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MGYR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MGYR five years ago would be worth $17,310 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,644 for BCBP. Over the past 12 months, BCBP leads with a +32.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGYR at 22.9% vs BCBP's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +28.6% | +9.3% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.7% | +32.4% | +9.0% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.6% | +11.5% | +54.1% | +55.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +73.1% | -3.6% | +29.9% | +2.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.8% | +58.6% | +102.2% | +45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | +3.7% | +15.5% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGYR and BCBP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BCBP currently trades 96.5% from its 52-week high vs MGYR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.28x | 0.85x | 0.89x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.00 | $10.47 | $46.92 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.35 | $7.31 | $39.20 | $16.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +96.5% | +96.1% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 59.5 | 57.3 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 93K | 236K | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCBP and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BCBP as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for OCFC (target: $20) vs -10.9% for BCBP (target: $9). For income investors, BCBP offers the higher dividend yield at 6.12% vs MGYR's 1.65%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.00 | $46.00 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +6.1% | +3.2% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.29 | $0.62 | $1.43 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +7.6% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BCBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MGYR vs BCBP vs NBTB vs OCFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC?
On trailing P/E, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the cheapest at 11. 3x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. at 16. 1x. On forward P/E, BCB Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC?
Over the past 5 years, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) delivered a total return of +73. 1%, compared to -3. 6% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MGYR returned +125. 8% versus OCFC's +45. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 275% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 99% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -15. 5% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magyar Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 26. 8% year-over-year, compared to -184. 8% for BCB Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus -7. 5% for BCB Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus -11. 0% for BCBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) trades at 9. 2x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 1. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OCFC: 4. 2% to $19. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BCB Bancorp, Inc. (BCBP) offers the highest yield at 6. 1%, versus 1. 7% for Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR).
09Is MGYR or BCBP or NBTB or OCFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MGYR and BCBP and NBTB and OCFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.