Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $204M | $1690.08T | $30.33B | $275.10B | $8.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $0.00 | $16.63B | $64.93B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-79M | $-168M | $1.39B | $18.25B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | -5.6% | — | 26.1% | 74.2% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -43.4% | — | 13.9% | 41.1% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.0x | 21.7x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $58M | $22M | $16.17B | $50.53B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $194M | $1.98B | $14.56B | $214M |
MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Milestone Pharmaceu… (MIST) | 100 | 60.8 | -39.2% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MIST lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.67x
- +100.5% vs IQV's +16.6%
IQV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 166.6% 10Y total return vs MRK's 164.7%
- PEG 0.34 vs MRK's 1.02
- 5.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
MRK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 2.9%
- Beta 0.45, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.54x
- 28.1% margin vs MIST's -55.3%
- Beta 0.45 vs MIST's 2.18, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs MIST's -55.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs MIST's 2.18, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield; 14-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs IQV's +16.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.6% ROA vs MIST's -102.2%, ROIC 22.0% vs -133.7% |
MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MRK leads in 4 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • DBVT leads 1 • MIST leads 0 • CRL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $64.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIST's -55.3%. On growth, IQV holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $0 | $16.6B | $64.9B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$62M | -$112M | $3.5B | $32.4B | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$79M | -$168M | $1.4B | $18.3B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49M | -$151M | $2.7B | $12.4B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | — | +26.1% | +74.2% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | — | +13.9% | +41.1% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -55.3% | — | +8.3% | +28.1% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.2% | — | +16.1% | +19.0% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +8.4% | +4.5% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | +91.5% | +15.0% | -19.6% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 33% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs MRK's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $1690.08T | $30.3B | $275.1B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $1690.08T | $44.5B | $311.1B | $11.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.56x | -0.75x | 22.79x | 15.30x | -61.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.96x | 21.69x | 16.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.56x | 0.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 12.98x | 10.61x | 12.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 131.94x | — | 1.86x | 4.24x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.86x | 0.65x | 4.68x | 5.30x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.79x | 22.26x | 16.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRK delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-8 for MIST. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBVT scores 4/9 vs MIST's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.3% | -130.2% | +22.1% | +36.1% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -102.2% | -89.0% | +4.7% | +14.6% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -133.7% | — | +8.7% | +22.0% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -74.4% | -145.7% | +11.0% | +23.8% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.40x | 0.13x | 2.44x | 0.96x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | -$172M | $14.2B | $36.0B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $194M | $2.0B | $14.6B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58M | $22M | $16.2B | $50.5B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.71x | -189.82x | 3.10x | 19.68x | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $16,955 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,172 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs IQV's +16.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 5.7% vs MIST's -21.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.3% | +3.6% | -20.7% | +5.4% | -12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.0% | +100.5% | +16.6% | +47.7% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +18.1% | -5.9% | +2.1% | -6.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | -68.3% | -22.8% | +69.5% | -46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.5% | -87.1% | +166.6% | +164.7% | +114.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | +5.7% | -2.0% | +0.7% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MRK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRK is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MIST's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRK currently trades 89.0% from its 52-week high vs MIST's 62.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 1.26x | 1.32x | 0.45x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.06 | $26.18 | $247.05 | $125.14 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $7.53 | $134.65 | $73.31 | $132.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.7% | +75.3% | +72.3% | +89.0% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 47.4 | 60.3 | 43.7 | 57.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 252K | 1.5M | 7.2M | 792K |
Analyst Outlook
MRK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MIST as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", MRK as "Buy", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 281.8% upside for MIST (target: $7) vs 16.1% for MRK (target: $129). MRK is the only dividend payer here at 2.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.33 | $46.33 | $223.75 | $129.31 | $206.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 15 | 44 | 37 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +2.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.26 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +1.8% | +4.1% |
MRK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
MIST vs DBVT vs IQV vs MRK vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Milestone Pharmaceuticals Inc. (MIST) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL?
On trailing P/E, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. 's 1. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +69. 5%, compared to -68. 3% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 6% versus MIST's -87. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Milestone Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning MIST is approximately 380% more volatile than MRK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Merck & Co. , Inc. grew EPS 8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL?
Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus -55. 3% for Milestone Pharmaceuticals Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus -40. 2% for MIST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRK leads at 72. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. 's 1. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 7. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MIST: 281. 8% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL?
In this comparison, MRK (2.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MIST, DBVT, IQV, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MIST or DBVT or IQV or MRK or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 2. 9% yield, +164. 7% 10Y return). Milestone Pharmaceuticals Inc. (MIST) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRK: +164. 7%, MIST: -87. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MIST and DBVT and IQV and MRK and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MIST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MRK pays a dividend while MIST, DBVT, IQV, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.