Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $22.52B | $1.99B | $12.98B | $33.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.57B | $927M | $11.49B | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.77B | $314M | $3.09B | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 66.5% | 44.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 47.9% | 35.5% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 9.2x | 7.7x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.30B | $68M | $2.33B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.96B | $1.21B | $1.73B | $993M |
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.7%
- 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HCI's 1.0%
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
- PEG 0.19 vs MKL's 0.64
- Beta 0.39, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.24x
RNR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35
- +21.9% vs MKL's -4.1%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HCI's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs MKL's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.7% |
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
RNR leads 2 • MKL leads 1 • ACGL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 21.5x HCI's $927M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $927M | $11.5B | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $454M | $4.1B | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $314M | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $431M | $4.2B | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +66.5% | +44.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +47.9% | +35.5% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +33.9% | +26.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +46.4% | +36.7% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +11.9% | -36.4% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +23.4% | +100.9% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RNR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 50% valuation discount to MKL's 10.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HCI offers better value at 0.13x vs MKL's 0.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.5B | $2.0B | $13.0B | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.9B | $844M | $13.6B | $35.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 6.15x | 5.31x | 8.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.99x | 9.19x | 7.66x | 10.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 0.13x | 0.18x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.78x | 1.92x | 3.38x | 6.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 2.20x | 1.02x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.77x | 0.70x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 4.47x | 3.51x | 5.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI delivers a 32.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKL's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs ACGL's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +32.0% | +16.6% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +13.2% | +5.7% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +6.8% | +16.0% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +40.6% | +10.7% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.06x | 0.12x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $339M | -$1.1B | $598M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.0B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $68M | $2.3B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.00x | 67.24x | 33.28x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,749 for MKL. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs MKL's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs ACGL's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | -16.7% | +10.6% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | +2.4% | +21.9% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.0% | +209.6% | +45.7% | +30.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +105.3% | +87.1% | +144.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | +436.8% | +176.9% | +324.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +45.7% | +13.4% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKL's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs HCI's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.39x | -0.03x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2207.59 | $210.50 | $318.20 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1719.41 | $136.37 | $231.17 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +72.6% | +94.5% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.5 | 48.7 | 46.9 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 167K | 303K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKL as "Hold", HCI as "Buy", RNR as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for ACGL (target: $104) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.70% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1950.00 | $126.50 | $308.33 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 | 28 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.0% | +0.6% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $48.55 | $1.50 | $1.67 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +0.1% | +12.3% | +5.6% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RNR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Markel Corporation at 10. 6x. On forward P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +47. 5% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Markel Corporation's 0. 44β — meaning MKL is approximately -1479% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 23% for Markel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 12. 7% for Markel Corporation — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 16. 5% for MKL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Markel Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACGL: 10. 0% to $104. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
In this comparison, MKL (2.
7% yield), HCI (1. 0% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ACGL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, MKL: +89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKL and HCI and RNR and ACGL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MKL, HCI, RNR pay a dividend while ACGL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.