Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $25M | $21.32B | $3.45B | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $69M | $3.20B | $552M | $1.08B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $382M | $225M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 67.8% | 62.6% | 81.5% | 95.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.9% | 10.2% | 4.9% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 56.4x | 16.9x | 13.5x |
| Total Debt | $86M | $7.85B | $75M | $1.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $1.35B | $81M | $657M |
MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mogo Inc. (MOGO) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) | 100 | 66.6 | -33.4% |
| Dave Inc. (DAVE) | 100 | 61.3 | -38.7% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 25.0 | -75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MOGO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- beta 1.70
- Beta 1.70 vs UPST's 2.87, lower leverage
AFRM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
DAVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 47.5%, EPS growth 222.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.39, Low D/E 21.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 2.39, current ratio 3.83x
- 40.8% margin vs UPST's 5.0%
UPST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -1.7% 10Y total return vs DAVE's -18.3%
- 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs MOGO's 9.2%
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 56.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs MOGO's 9.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 56.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 40.8% margin vs UPST's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs UPST's 2.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +67.8% vs UPST's -39.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 49.6% ROA vs UPST's 1.7%, ROIC 11.1% vs 1.7% |
MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories
MOGO leads 1 • AFRM leads 0 • UPST leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 46.2x MOGO's $69M. DAVE is the more profitable business, keeping 40.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%. On growth, DAVE holds the edge at +36.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $69M | $3.2B | $552M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $533M | $33M | $68M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $382M | $225M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $787M | $327M | -$146M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.8% | +62.6% | +81.5% | +95.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | +10.2% | +4.9% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +11.9% | +40.8% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +24.6% | +59.2% | -15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | -65.8% | +36.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.4% | — | +104.1% | -169.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MOGO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, DAVE trades at a 96% valuation discount to AFRM's 426.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOGO's 23.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 201.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $21.3B | $3.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $82M | $27.8B | $3.4B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.54x | 426.73x | 18.95x | 64.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.43x | 16.85x | 13.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.48x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.67x | 201.89x | 71.49x | 50.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 6.61x | 6.73x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 7.11x | 10.52x | 3.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 35.44x | 11.89x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAVE leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAVE delivers a 84.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $85 in annual profit, vs $7 for UPST. DAVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRM's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AFRM scores 6/9 vs MOGO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +11.2% | +84.5% | +6.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.2% | +3.1% | +49.6% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.7% | -0.7% | +11.1% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.9% | -0.9% | +12.9% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.05x | 2.56x | 0.21x | 2.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $77M | $6.5B | -$5M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $1.4B | $81M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $86M | $7.9B | $75M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.11x | 1.88x | 22.86x | 1.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AFRM five years ago would be worth $11,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $446 for MOGO. Over the past 12 months, DAVE leads with a +67.8% total return vs UPST's -39.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAVE at 2.7% vs MOGO's -24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.0% | -13.5% | +16.8% | -36.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.8% | +18.0% | +67.8% | -39.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | +436.1% | +4877.3% | +116.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.5% | +12.3% | -18.0% | -67.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.0% | -34.2% | -18.3% | -1.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.3% | +75.0% | +2.7% | +29.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOGO and DAVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOGO is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAVE currently trades 89.1% from its 52-week high vs MOGO's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.70x | 2.61x | 2.39x | 2.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.83 | $100.00 | $287.69 | $87.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.91 | $42.09 | $126.89 | $23.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +64.0% | +89.1% | +33.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.5 | 65.9 | 52.7 | 43.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 5.3M | 599K | 4.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AFRM as "Buy", DAVE as "Buy", UPST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.5% upside for DAVE (target: $340) vs 27.7% for AFRM (target: $82).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $81.71 | $339.67 | $38.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.2% | +1.3% | 0.0% |
DAVE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MOGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MOGO vs AFRM vs DAVE vs UPST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 2% for Mogo Inc. (MOGO). Dave Inc. (DAVE) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST?
On trailing P/E, Dave Inc.
(DAVE) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 426. 7x. On forward P/E, Upstart Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST?
Over the past 5 years, Affirm Holdings, Inc.
(AFRM) delivered a total return of +12. 3%, compared to -95. 5% for Mogo Inc. (MOGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UPST returned -1. 7% versus MOGO's -83. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mogo Inc.
(MOGO) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 70β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning UPST is approximately 69% more volatile than MOGO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dave Inc. (DAVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 9. 2% for Mogo Inc. (MOGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dave Inc. grew EPS 222. 9% year-over-year, compared to 22. 2% for Mogo Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DAVE leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST?
Dave Inc.
(DAVE) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 3% net margin versus -19. 2% for Mogo Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DAVE leads at 8. 0% versus -5. 2% for MOGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 56. 4x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 43. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DAVE: 32. 5% to $339. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MOGO or AFRM or DAVE or UPST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mogo Inc.
(MOGO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOGO: -83. 0%, AFRM: -34. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MOGO and AFRM and DAVE and UPST?
These companies operate in different sectors (MOGO (Technology) and AFRM (Technology) and DAVE (Technology) and UPST (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MOGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DAVE is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.