Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$19.35B
5Y Perf.-20.7%
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.53B
5Y Perf.-79.7%
BNTX
BioNTech SE

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • DE
Market Cap$23.94B
5Y Perf.+92.3%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - General

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$150.77B
5Y Perf.-26.8%

MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MRNA logoMRNA
NVAX logoNVAX
BNTX logoBNTX
PFE logoPFE
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyDrug Manufacturers - General
Market Cap$19.35B$1.53B$23.94B$150.77B
Revenue (TTM)$2.23B$596M$2.86B$63.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-3.19B$-88M$-1.13B$7.49B
Gross Margin-13.9%84.6%77.7%69.3%
Operating Margin-153.3%-11.2%-45.9%23.4%
Forward P/E3.7x9.0x
Total Debt$1.92B$249M$267M$67.42B
Cash & Equiv.$2.60B$241M$7.67B$1.14B

MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MRNA
NVAX
BNTX
PFE
StockMay 20May 26Return
Moderna, Inc. (MRNA)10079.3-20.7%
Novavax, Inc. (NVAX)10020.3-79.7%
BioNTech SE (BNTX)100192.3+92.3%
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)10073.2-26.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Novavax, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MRNA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MRNA
Moderna, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

MRNA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +99.7% vs BNTX's +0.5%
Best for: momentum
NVAX
Novavax, Inc.
The Growth Play

NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
  • 64.7% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure
BNTX
BioNTech SE
The Long-Run Compounder

BNTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 5.8% 10Y total return vs PFE's 30.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.14, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 7.54x
  • Beta 1.14, current ratio 7.54x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
The Income Pick

PFE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
  • 11.8% margin vs MRNA's -143.6%
  • Beta 0.54 vs NVAX's 2.11
  • 6.5% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVAX logoNVAX64.7% revenue growth vs MRNA's -39.2%
ValueNVAX logoNVAXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsPFE logoPFE11.8% margin vs MRNA's -143.6%
Stability / SafetyPFE logoPFEBeta 0.54 vs NVAX's 2.11
DividendsPFE logoPFE6.5% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MRNA logoMRNA+99.7% vs BNTX's +0.5%
Efficiency (ROA)PFE logoPFE3.6% ROA vs MRNA's -26.6%, ROIC 7.5% vs -26.1%

MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MRNAModerna, Inc.
FY 2025
Product Sales
100.0%$3.3B
NVAXNovavax, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
50.0%$685M
Nuvaxovid Sales
45.6%$625M
Supply Sales
4.4%$60M
BNTXBioNTech SE
FY 2025
Other Sales
100.0%$262M
PFEPfizer Inc.
FY 2025
Biopharma Segment
97.8%$61.2B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
2.2%$1.4B

MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFELAGGINGBNTX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

PFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PFE is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.3B annually — 106.2x NVAX's $596M. PFE is the more profitable business, keeping 11.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MRNA's -143.6%. On growth, MRNA holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.BNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEPFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.2B$596M$2.9B$63.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3.2B-$47M-$931M$21.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3.2B-$88M-$1.1B$7.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1.6B-$96M$277M$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-13.9%+84.6%+77.7%+69.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-153.3%-11.2%-45.9%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-143.6%-14.7%-39.6%+11.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-71.1%-16.1%+9.7%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.6%-79.1%-24.5%+5.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-34.9%-102.0%-2.1%-9.5%
PFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — NVAX and BNTX each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 3.7x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 81% valuation discount to PFE's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFE's 10.7x.

MetricMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.BNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEPFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Market CapShares × price$19.3B$1.5B$23.9B$150.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$18.7B$1.5B$15.3B$217.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.72x3.69x-18.00x19.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.95x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.59x10.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.95x1.36x7.40x2.41x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.19x1.02x1.74x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF75.61x16.61x
Evenly matched — NVAX and BNTX each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

PFE delivers a 8.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-37 for MRNA. BNTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFE's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs MRNA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.BNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEPFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-36.7%-6.0%+8.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-26.6%-7.4%-5.3%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-26.1%-4.3%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-27.6%+100.4%-3.1%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93547
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.01x0.78x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$679M$8M-$7.4B$66.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.6B$241M$7.7B$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.9B$249M$267M$67.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1803.00x-5.10x-62.15x4.02x
PFE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — MRNA and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFE five years ago would be worth $8,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $543 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, MRNA leads with a +99.7% total return vs BNTX's +0.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVAX at 7.9% vs MRNA's -28.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.BNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEPFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+58.1%+31.3%-1.5%+7.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+99.7%+54.2%+0.5%+23.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-63.0%+25.6%-11.8%-18.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-69.6%-94.6%-42.0%-11.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+162.3%-89.8%+583.8%+30.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-28.2%+7.9%-4.1%-6.5%
Evenly matched — MRNA and NVAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

PFE is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PFE currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs BNTX's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.BNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEPFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.82x2.11x1.14x0.54x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$59.55$11.97$124.00$28.75
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.28$5.80$79.52$21.97
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+81.9%+78.2%+76.8%+92.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10040.243.443.643.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded6.9M4.3M1.2M33.2M
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MRNA as "Hold", NVAX as "Buy", BNTX as "Buy", PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 92.3% upside for NVAX (target: $18) vs -26.2% for MRNA (target: $36). PFE is the only dividend payer here at 6.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMRNA logoMRNAModerna, Inc.NVAX logoNVAXNovavax, Inc.BNTX logoBNTXBioNTech SEPFE logoPFEPfizer Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$36.00$18.00$137.13$27.27
# AnalystsCovering analysts27232439
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01115
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.3%0.0%0.0%
PFE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

PFE leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallPfizer Inc. (PFE)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MRNA vs NVAX vs BNTX vs PFE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE?

On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE?

Over the past 5 years, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) delivered a total return of -11. 3%, compared to -94. 6% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BNTX returned +583. 8% versus NVAX's -89. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 288% more volatile than PFE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BioNTech SE (BNTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for Pfizer Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus -39. 2% for Moderna, Inc. (MRNA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -62. 8% for BioNTech SE. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVAX leads at -11. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE?

Novavax, Inc.

(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -145. 2% for Moderna, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -158. 1% for MRNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVAX: 92.

3% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE?

In this comparison, PFE (6.

5% yield) pays a dividend. MRNA, NVAX, BNTX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MRNA or NVAX or BNTX or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pfizer Inc.

(PFE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 6. 5% yield). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFE: +30. 7%, NVAX: -89. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MRNA and NVAX and BNTX and PFE?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MRNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; BNTX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. PFE pays a dividend while MRNA, NVAX, BNTX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MRNA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 131%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 50%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BNTX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFE

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MRNA and NVAX and BNTX and PFE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MRNA: 263.6% · NVAX: -79.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.