Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $2.11B | $3.17B | $1.87B | $10.57B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $586M | $822M | $472M | $2.52B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $74M | $-50M | $519M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 60.1% | 55.6% | 57.4% | 44.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | 8.2% | -9.3% | 26.0% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.6x | 18.0x | 21.7x | 21.8x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $237M | $346M | $354M | $0.00 | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $368M | $63M | $102M | $599M |
NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) | 100 | 48.7 | -51.3% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 30.9 | -69.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCNO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
QTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 225.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs JKHY's 94.9%
ALKT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 32.9% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- 20.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
FIS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs JKHY's 2.16
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs ALKT's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.6% vs ALKT's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs -8.6% |
NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 3 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • NCNO leads 0 • QTWO leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 23.1x ALKT's $472M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $586M | $822M | $472M | $2.5B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $27M | $115M | -$12M | $810M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $74M | -$50M | $519M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $60M | $196M | $44M | $728M | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.1% | +55.6% | +57.4% | +44.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +8.2% | -9.3% | +26.0% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +9.0% | -10.6% | +20.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +23.8% | +9.4% | +28.9% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.6% | +14.1% | +28.9% | +8.7% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.3% | +4.7% | -22.7% | +12.5% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, JKHY trades at a 63% valuation discount to QTWO's 63.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JKHY offers better value at 2.32x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $3.2B | $1.9B | $10.6B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.2B | $3.2B | $2.2B | $10.5B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -53.88x | 63.36x | -37.89x | 23.40x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.64x | 18.05x | 21.69x | 21.79x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.32x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 121.97x | 27.39x | — | 13.53x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.89x | 3.99x | 4.20x | 4.45x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 4.99x | 5.00x | 5.01x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.45x | 16.30x | 45.09x | 17.97x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QTWO scores 7/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +11.9% | -14.0% | +24.0% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +5.5% | -5.9% | +17.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.2% | +5.1% | -8.6% | +21.0% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +5.6% | -9.3% | +22.7% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.52x | 0.98x | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116M | -$22M | $290M | -$102M | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $368M | $63M | $102M | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $237M | $346M | $354M | $0 | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.51x | 15.31x | -3.73x | 122.37x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — QTWO and JKHY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JKHY five years ago would be worth $10,029 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, JKHY leads with a -13.6% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QTWO at 30.9% vs NCNO's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.9% | -27.0% | -23.1% | -17.8% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -22.1% | -36.9% | -37.8% | -13.6% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.0% | +124.4% | +41.1% | -1.0% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -68.6% | -48.0% | -54.9% | +0.3% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.6% | +103.5% | -59.5% | +94.9% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.6% | +30.9% | +12.2% | -0.3% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
JKHY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALKT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JKHY currently trades 75.5% from its 52-week high vs NCNO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.06x | 1.30x | 0.28x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.92 | $96.68 | $31.66 | $193.39 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.80 | $44.65 | $14.11 | $141.81 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +52.4% | +55.1% | +75.5% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 47.5 | 50.9 | 28.2 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.7M | 929K | 1.9M | 902K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JKHY and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NCNO as "Buy", QTWO as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 26.2% for ALKT (target: $22). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.33 | $76.00 | $22.00 | $203.75 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 32 | 12 | 22 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 32 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.25 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
JKHY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NCNO vs QTWO vs ALKT vs JKHY vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate nCino, Inc. (NCNO) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Q2 Holdings, Inc. at 63. 4x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) delivered a total return of +0. 3%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QTWO returned +103. 5% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Alkami Technology, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning ALKT is approximately 359% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q2 Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JKHY leads at 23. 9% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCNO leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NCNO, QTWO, ALKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCNO or QTWO or ALKT or JKHY or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, ALKT: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCNO and QTWO and ALKT and JKHY and FIS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QTWO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. JKHY, FIS pay a dividend while NCNO, QTWO, ALKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.