Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Internet Content & Information
Software - Infrastructure
NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Internet Content & Information | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $7.72B | $1.86B | $33.53B | $29.63B | $3.06T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.95B | $1.17B | $4.87B | $5.30B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $613M | $57M | $1.90B | $104M | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 55.1% | 77.0% | 48.8% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 4.7% | 23.1% | 4.7% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 6.9x | 17.9x | 35.3x | 24.9x |
| Total Debt | $164M | $847M | $31M | $1.08B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $379M | $232M | $1.27B | $682M | $30.24B |
NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
| Zoom Communications… (ZM) | 100 | 58.6 | -41.4% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 96.9 | -3.1% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 225.8 | +125.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NICE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- PEG 0.33 vs MSFT's 1.32
- Beta 0.72 vs FIVN's 1.79, lower leverage
FIVN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 24.9x)
ZM is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 4.33x
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +89.8% vs NICE's -20.9%
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs TWLO's 5.8%
- 14.9% revenue growth vs ZM's 4.4%
- 39.3% margin vs TWLO's 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.9% revenue growth vs ZM's 4.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 24.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs TWLO's 2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.72 vs FIVN's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 19-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.8% vs NICE's -20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs TWLO's 1.1%, ROIC 24.9% vs 1.6% |
NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NICE leads 1 • TWLO leads 1 • FIVN leads 0 • ZM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ZM and MSFT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 270.9x FIVN's $1.2B. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TWLO's 2.0%. On growth, TWLO holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $1.2B | $4.9B | $5.3B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $846M | $140M | $1.3B | $415M | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $613M | $57M | $1.9B | $104M | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $665M | $206M | $1.9B | $1.0B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +55.1% | +77.0% | +48.8% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +4.7% | +23.1% | +4.7% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +4.9% | +39.0% | +2.0% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +17.6% | +39.5% | +19.0% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +9.2% | +5.3% | +20.0% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.8% | +20.0% | +91.4% | +3.8% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
NICE leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 931.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NICE offers better value at 0.48x vs MSFT's 1.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.7B | $1.9B | $33.5B | $29.6B | $3.06T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $2.5B | $32.3B | $30.0B | $3.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.82x | 52.74x | 17.65x | 931.33x | 30.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.85x | 6.86x | 17.89x | 35.28x | 24.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.48x | — | 0.79x | — | 1.60x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.72x | 17.98x | 25.70x | 76.59x | 19.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 1.62x | 6.89x | 5.85x | 10.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 2.69x | 3.42x | 4.00x | 8.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | 9.23x | 17.43x | 28.69x | 42.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSFT delivers a 33.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. ZM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIVN's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs MSFT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +7.4% | +19.4% | +1.3% | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.0% | +3.2% | +15.9% | +1.1% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +1.7% | +10.4% | +1.6% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +2.2% | +11.8% | +1.9% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.08x | 0.00x | 0.14x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$216M | $615M | -$1.2B | $399M | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $379M | $232M | $1.3B | $682M | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $164M | $847M | $31M | $1.1B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.94x | — | — | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSFT five years ago would be worth $17,276 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,418 for FIVN. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +89.8% total return vs NICE's -20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 55.1% vs FIVN's -24.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +29.0% | +30.9% | +41.4% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.9% | -3.9% | +39.5% | +89.8% | -4.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | -56.4% | +72.1% | +273.5% | +35.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | -85.8% | -63.3% | -41.7% | +72.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.6% | +153.0% | +76.0% | +579.3% | +770.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.6% | -24.1% | +19.8% | +55.1% | +10.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NICE and ZM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVN's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZM currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs NICE's 69.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.79x | 0.95x | 1.51x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.61 | $30.38 | $109.50 | $196.37 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $94.89 | $13.29 | $69.15 | $91.84 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.2% | +79.9% | +99.6% | +99.6% | +74.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.6 | 82.7 | 79.3 | 81.4 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 588K | 2.7M | 4.5M | 2.2M | 32.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NICE as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy", ZM as "Hold", TWLO as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs -7.8% for ZM (target: $101). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $150.88 | $28.40 | $100.56 | $185.17 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 41 | 48 | 52 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +2.7% | +4.8% | +2.9% | +0.6% |
MSFT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). NICE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NICE vs FIVN vs ZM vs TWLO vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger pick with 14.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Twilio Inc. at 931. 3x. On forward P/E, Five9, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NICE Ltd. wins at 0. 33x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) delivered a total return of +72.
8%, compared to -85. 8% for Five9, Inc. (FIVN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +768. 1% versus NICE's +51. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Five9, Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning FIVN is approximately 147% more volatile than NICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 108% for Five9, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is pulling ahead at 14.
9% versus 4. 4% for Zoom Communications, Inc. (ZM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT?
Zoom Communications, Inc.
(ZM) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus 0. 7% for Twilio Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 2. 8% for FIVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZM leads at 77. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NICE Ltd. (NICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Five9, Inc. (FIVN) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 35. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 28. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 34. 1% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. NICE, FIVN, ZM, TWLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NICE or FIVN or ZM or TWLO or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 8% yield, +768. 1% 10Y return). Five9, Inc. (FIVN) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +768. 1%, FIVN: +131. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NICE and FIVN and ZM and TWLO and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NICE (Technology) and FIVN (Technology) and ZM (Technology) and TWLO (Communication Services) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while NICE, FIVN, ZM, TWLO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.