Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Luxury Goods
Security & Protection Services
Specialty Retail
NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Specialty Retail | Luxury Goods | Security & Protection Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $45K | $635M | $3.59B | $10M | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $47M | $321M | $723M | $72M | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-21M | $-65M | $-24M | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 1.0% | 80.4% | 73.3% | 15.1% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | -26.4% | -6.7% | -1.9% | -27.4% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 307.7x | — | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $52M | $463M | $3M | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $39M | $151M | $22M | $1.87B |
NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nixxy, Inc. (NIXXW) | 100 | 172.7 | +72.7% |
| ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) | 100 | 584.3 | +484.3% |
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 394.9 | +294.9% |
| Guardforce AI Co., … (GFAI) | 100 | 38.4 | -61.6% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 163.4 | +63.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NIXXW lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TDUP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.5%, EPS growth 75.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.5%
- 19.5% revenue growth vs NIXXW's -80.8%
REAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +75.9% vs NIXXW's -72.7%
Among these 5 stocks, GFAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- 369.5% 10Y total return vs NIXXW's 81.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, current ratio 1.10x
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.5% revenue growth vs NIXXW's -80.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs NIXXW's -39.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs NIXXW's -72.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs NIXXW's -114.3%, ROIC 16.8% vs -329.9% |
NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories
NIXXW leads 0 • TDUP leads 0 • REAL leads 0 • GFAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 247.4x NIXXW's $47M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NIXXW's -39.2%. On growth, NIXXW holds the edge at +233.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $47M | $321M | $723M | $72M | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$8M | $11M | -$12M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$21M | -$65M | -$24M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$3M | $13M | -$6M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | +80.4% | +73.3% | +15.1% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | -6.7% | -1.9% | -27.4% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.2% | -6.7% | -9.0% | -32.9% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | -1.0% | +1.7% | -8.8% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +233.9% | +14.6% | +18.5% | +3.6% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.2% | -25.0% | -150.0% | +38.9% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
EBAY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, EBAY's 21.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REAL's 430.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44,916 | $635M | $3.6B | $10M | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1M | $648M | $3.9B | -$9M | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -28.94x | -18.24x | -0.89x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 307.69x | — | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 430.51x | — | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 2.04x | 5.19x | 0.28x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 10.11x | — | 0.16x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3527.12x | 195.62x | — | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-173 for NIXXW. GFAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GFAI scores 6/9 vs REAL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -173.4% | -36.1% | — | -69.7% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.3% | -12.5% | -17.3% | -50.2% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.3% | -19.4% | — | -41.6% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | -18.8% | -15.0% | -19.1% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.46x | 0.88x | — | 0.08x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $14M | $312M | -$19M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $39M | $151M | $22M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $52M | $463M | $3M | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -122.56x | -11.28x | -5.83x | -167.24x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — REAL and EBAY each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $46 for GFAI. Over the past 12 months, REAL leads with a +75.9% total return vs NIXXW's -72.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs GFAI's -60.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -74.7% | -18.9% | -21.5% | -26.3% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.7% | -23.6% | +75.9% | -53.2% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.0% | +56.2% | +805.1% | -93.8% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.0% | -70.5% | -45.6% | -99.5% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.0% | -75.4% | -57.1% | -99.5% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.9% | +16.0% | +108.4% | -60.4% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NIXXW and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NIXXW is the less volatile stock with a -3.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs NIXXW's 10.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -3.01x | 1.81x | 2.95x | 2.31x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.07 | $12.28 | $17.39 | $1.50 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $3.08 | $4.70 | $0.38 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.6% | +40.1% | +71.3% | +31.5% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.7 | 71.8 | 66.3 | 47.0 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 2.6M | 3.3M | 378K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TDUP as "Buy", REAL as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for REAL (target: $18) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). EBAY is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.67 | $18.17 | — | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 25 | — | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
NIXXW vs TDUP vs REAL vs GFAI vs EBAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ThredUp Inc.
(TDUP) is the stronger pick with 19. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXXW). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ThredUp Inc. (TDUP) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY?
On forward P/E, eBay Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -99. 5% for Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBAY returned +369. 5% versus GFAI's -99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nixxy, Inc.
(NIXXW) is the lower-risk stock at -3. 01β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately -198% more volatile than NIXXW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ThredUp Inc.
(TDUP) is pulling ahead at 19. 5% versus -80. 8% for Nixxy, Inc. (NIXXW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guardforce AI Co. , Limited grew EPS 88. 3% year-over-year, compared to -215. 7% for Nixxy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REAL leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -36. 9% for Nixxy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -24. 4% for NIXXW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIXXW leads at 99. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 290. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for REAL: 46. 5% to $18. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY?
In this comparison, EBAY (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. NIXXW, TDUP, REAL, GFAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NIXXW or TDUP or REAL or GFAI or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nixxy, Inc.
(NIXXW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -3. 01)). Guardforce AI Co. , Limited (GFAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NIXXW: +81. 0%, GFAI: -99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NIXXW and TDUP and REAL and GFAI and EBAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (NIXXW (Industrials) and TDUP (Consumer Cyclical) and REAL (Consumer Cyclical) and GFAI (Industrials) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NIXXW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDUP is a small-cap high-growth stock; REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GFAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. EBAY pays a dividend while NIXXW, TDUP, REAL, GFAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.