Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.49B | $4.47B | $819M | $711M | $4.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $822M | $3.11B | $3.23B | $565M | $3.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $428M | $745M | $-60M | $43M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 53.1% | 87.0% | 70.0% | 50.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 31.9% | 77.1% | 28.1% | 23.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 7.3x | 12.2x | 20.0x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $5.86B | $45.71B | $526M | $4.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.64B | $4.24B | $2.10B | $10M | $72M |
NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nelnet, Inc. (NNI) | 100 | 285.6 | +185.6% |
| SLM Corporation (SLM) | 100 | 297.4 | +197.4% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 117.1 | +17.1% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 212.3 | +112.3% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1196.3 | +1096.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NNI is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.59 vs ENVA's 1.48
SLM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 15.0%
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 10.3x)
- 15.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NNI's 2.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NAVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.92, yield 7.3%, current ratio 0.41x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NNI's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NNI's 0.9%
WRLD is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
- PEG 0.56 vs SLM's 0.81
- NIM 41.9% vs NAVI's 1.1%
ENVA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.1% 10Y total return vs SLM's 281.8%
- 18.6% NII/revenue growth vs NNI's -55.5%
- +80.9% vs NAVI's -26.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.6% NII/revenue growth vs NNI's -55.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 10.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NNI's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.59 vs ENVA's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 15.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs NNI's 2.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.9% vs NAVI's -26.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs NNI's 0.9% |
NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories
WRLD leads 1 • ENVA leads 1 • NNI leads 1 • SLM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.7x WRLD's $565M. NNI is the more profitable business, keeping 32.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $822M | $3.1B | $3.2B | $565M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $726M | $599M | $544M | $61M | $815M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $428M | $745M | -$60M | $43M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $267M | $646M | $323M | $252M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +53.1% | +87.0% | +70.0% | +50.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +31.9% | +77.1% | +28.1% | +23.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +24.0% | -2.5% | +15.9% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | +18.5% | +13.7% | +44.3% | +56.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.4% | +10.0% | +9.7% | -107.8% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, SLM trades at a 55% valuation discount to ENVA's 14.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WRLD offers better value at 0.24x vs SLM's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $4.5B | $819M | $711M | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$1.1B | $6.1B | $44.4B | $1.2B | $8.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 6.51x | -10.75x | 8.66x | 14.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.30x | 7.25x | 12.18x | 19.96x | 10.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.72x | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -1.58x | 6.11x | 17.81x | 7.28x | 11.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.82x | 1.44x | 0.25x | 1.26x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.90x | 0.36x | 1.77x | 3.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.76x | 1.86x | 2.84x | 2.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLM delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. WRLD carries lower financial leverage with a 1.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs NNI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.3% | +31.0% | -2.5% | +10.8% | +24.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +2.5% | -0.1% | +4.0% | +5.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +8.8% | +3.8% | +12.1% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +11.5% | +5.5% | +16.3% | +13.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.39x | 19.05x | 1.20x | 3.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.6B | $1.6B | $43.6B | $516M | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.6B | $4.2B | $2.1B | $10M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $5.9B | $45.7B | $526M | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.97x | 0.70x | 0.21x | 1.13x | 79.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $48,228 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,056 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +80.9% total return vs NAVI's -26.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 57.5% vs NAVI's -10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.4% | -17.3% | -30.6% | -0.5% | +4.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.0% | -26.7% | -26.8% | +5.4% | +80.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.9% | +67.7% | -29.3% | +29.1% | +290.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.7% | +22.6% | -29.4% | +6.1% | +382.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.2% | +281.8% | +15.4% | +254.6% | +2010.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.2% | +18.8% | -10.9% | +8.9% | +57.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NNI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NNI is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVA's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NNI currently trades 97.5% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 54.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.59x | 1.13x | 0.92x | 1.27x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $144.38 | $34.97 | $16.07 | $185.48 | $176.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $105.12 | $17.77 | $7.80 | $110.00 | $89.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +64.5% | +54.2% | +76.1% | +95.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.6 | 51.4 | 54.3 | 46.0 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 139K | 4.0M | 928K | 155K | 225K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NNI and SLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NNI as "Hold", SLM as "Buy", NAVI as "Hold", WRLD as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.9% upside for SLM (target: $30) vs -0.5% for NAVI (target: $9). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 14.99% vs NNI's 2.88%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.50 | $8.67 | — | $199.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 25 | 24 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +15.0% | +7.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 7 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.05 | $3.38 | $0.64 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.6% | +8.3% | +13.6% | +7.6% | +5.1% |
NAVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WRLD leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
NNI vs SLM vs NAVI vs WRLD vs ENVA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is the stronger pick with 18. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 5% for Nelnet, Inc. (NNI). SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (7. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SLM Corporation (SLM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA?
On trailing P/E, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the cheapest at 6.
5x versus Enova International, Inc. at 14. 6x. On forward P/E, SLM Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: World Acceptance Corporation wins at 0. 56x versus SLM Corporation's 0. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +382. 3%, compared to -29. 4% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 1% versus NAVI's +15. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nelnet, Inc.
(NNI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Enova International, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning ENVA is approximately 151% more volatile than NNI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 120% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) is pulling ahead at 18. 6% versus -55. 5% for Nelnet, Inc. (NNI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enova International, Inc. grew EPS 55. 9% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA?
Nelnet, Inc.
(NNI) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 4% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 0. 0% for NNI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAVI leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus SLM Corporation's 0. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SLM Corporation (SLM) trades at 7. 3x forward P/E versus 20. 0x for World Acceptance Corporation — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLM: 30. 9% to $29. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA?
In this comparison, SLM (15.
0% yield), NAVI (7. 3% yield), NNI (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. WRLD, ENVA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NNI or SLM or NAVI or WRLD or ENVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nelnet, Inc.
(NNI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 2. 9% yield, +269. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNI: +269. 2%, ENVA: +20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NNI and SLM and NAVI and WRLD and ENVA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NNI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock. NNI, SLM, NAVI pay a dividend while WRLD, ENVA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.