Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Communication Equipment
Agricultural - Machinery
NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Agricultural - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Communication Equipment | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $1.26B | $1.23B | $93.89B | $1.43B | $417.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $287M | $1.48B | $33.89B | $359M | $70.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $36M | $26M | $2.67B | $58M | $9.42B |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 26.1% | 25.4% | 49.7% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.4% | 3.7% | 11.2% | 21.4% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 28.1x | 14.9x | 24.1x | 18.4x | 37.0x |
| Total Debt | $37M | $320M | $8.11B | $5M | $43.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $72M | $2.85B | $108M | $9.98B |
NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NPK International I… (NPKI) | 100 | 178.8 | +78.8% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| Cummins Inc. (CMI) | 100 | 181.2 | +81.2% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 202.0 | +102.0% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 221.0 | +121.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NPKI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth 124.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.8%
- 27.4% revenue growth vs CMI's -1.3%
ASTE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CMI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ITRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.16, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 2.28x
- PEG 0.60 vs CMI's 2.14
- Beta 1.16, yield 3.1%, current ratio 2.28x
CAT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs CMI's 5.5%
- +178.6% vs ASTE's +37.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% revenue growth vs CMI's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.4x vs 37.0x), PEG 0.60 vs 1.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.1% margin vs ASTE's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs CMI's 1.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CMI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +178.6% vs ASTE's +37.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.8% ROA vs ASTE's 2.0%, ROIC 47.2% vs 6.2% |
NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 4 of 6 categories
CAT leads 1 • NPKI leads 0 • ASTE leads 0 • CMI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 246.2x NPKI's $287M. ITRN is the more profitable business, keeping 16.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ASTE's 1.7%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $287M | $1.5B | $33.9B | $359M | $70.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $53M | $84M | $4.6B | $96M | $14.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $36M | $26M | $2.7B | $58M | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $32M | $37M | $2.7B | $71M | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +26.1% | +25.4% | +49.7% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +3.7% | +11.2% | +21.4% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +1.7% | +7.9% | +16.1% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | +2.5% | +7.9% | +19.7% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.9% | +20.3% | +2.7% | +12.8% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -90.3% | -21.0% | +10.0% | +30.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.9x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 56% valuation discount to CAT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITRN offers better value at 0.68x vs CMI's 2.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $1.2B | $93.9B | $1.4B | $417.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $1.5B | $99.2B | $1.3B | $450.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.60x | 31.75x | 33.15x | 20.87x | 47.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 28.08x | 14.93x | 24.11x | 18.44x | 36.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.94x | 0.68x | 1.70x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.92x | 14.48x | 19.95x | 13.81x | 33.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.56x | 0.87x | 2.79x | 3.98x | 6.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.65x | 1.82x | 7.03x | 5.39x | 19.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 48.02x | 57.04x | 39.35x | 21.41x | 40.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $4 for ASTE. ITRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NPKI scores 7/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | +3.8% | +20.3% | +27.3% | +47.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.5% | +2.0% | +7.8% | +15.8% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +6.2% | +16.1% | +47.2% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.7% | +7.2% | +17.3% | +29.5% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.47x | 0.61x | 0.02x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | $248M | $5.3B | -$103M | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $72M | $2.8B | $108M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37M | $320M | $8.1B | $5M | $43.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 77.08x | 5.48x | 12.15x | 32.28x | 9.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $38,068 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,223 for ASTE. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +178.6% total return vs ASTE's +37.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 62.1% vs ASTE's 9.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.6% | +19.8% | +30.6% | +46.8% | +50.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +85.5% | +37.3% | +124.3% | +78.1% | +178.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.5% | +32.5% | +213.4% | +215.8% | +325.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.5% | -17.8% | +163.3% | +193.1% | +280.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.5% | +22.9% | +554.9% | +243.1% | +1230.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | +9.8% | +46.3% | +46.7% | +62.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMI's 1.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 81.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.52x | 1.62x | 1.16x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $65.65 | $718.08 | $61.13 | $931.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.63 | $36.43 | $300.93 | $32.71 | $322.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.6% | +81.2% | +94.6% | +99.7% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.6 | 38.2 | 63.1 | 68.5 | 66.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 768K | 225K | 796K | 119K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CMI and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NPKI as "Buy", ASTE as "Buy", CMI as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold", CAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -2.2% upside for CMI (target: $664) vs -32.5% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.10% vs CAT's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $664.30 | $56.00 | $850.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 12 | 51 | 5 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +1.1% | +3.1% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 21 | 3 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.51 | $7.61 | $1.89 | $5.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +1.2% |
ITRN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
NPKI vs ASTE vs CMI vs ITRN vs CAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 9x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NPK International Inc. (NPKI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT?
On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 9x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Astec Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. wins at 0. 60x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 14x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +280. 7%, compared to -17. 8% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1230% versus ASTE's +22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Cummins Inc. 's 1. 62β — meaning CMI is approximately 39% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NPK International Inc.
(NPKI) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -1. 3% for Cummins Inc. (CMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -27. 7% for Cummins Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NPKI leads at 12. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT?
Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus 2. 8% for Astec Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus 4. 6% for ASTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ITRN leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Cummins Inc. 's 2. 14x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 37. 0x for Caterpillar Inc. — 22. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMI: -2. 2% to $664. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
1% yield), CMI (1. 1% yield), ASTE (1. 0% yield), CAT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NPKI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NPKI or ASTE or CMI or ITRN or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 7% yield, +1230% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1230%, NPKI: +85. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NPKI and ASTE and CMI and ITRN and CAT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NPKI (Energy) and ASTE (Industrials) and CMI (Industrials) and ITRN (Technology) and CAT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NPKI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. ASTE, CMI, ITRN, CAT pay a dividend while NPKI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.