Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.25B | $3.82B | $1.60B | $1.15B | $908M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $800M | $1.38B | $968M | $499M | $445M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $232M | $315M | $59M | $134M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | 75.9% | 55.1% | 48.6% | 55.0% | 57.5% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 29.4% | 8.3% | 38.0% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 8.9x | 10.5x | 11.6x | 8.9x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $209M | $396M | $384M | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.61B | $146M | $560M | $807M | $213M |
NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Bank of N.T. Bu… (NTB) | 100 | 230.6 | +130.6% |
| Cathay General Banc… (CATY) | 100 | 211.3 | +111.3% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 253.0 | +153.0% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.3 | +236.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 516.92x
- Beta 0.65, yield 3.3%, current ratio 516.92x
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.5x), PEG 0.66 vs 1.09
- Beta 0.65 vs HOPE's 1.10, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, CATY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs CATY's 2.4%
PFBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 256.1% 10Y total return vs NTB's 191.3%
- PEG 0.51 vs CATY's 1.09
- NIM 3.6% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
HAFC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 22.4%
- 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 10.5x), PEG 0.66 vs 1.09 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.65 vs HOPE's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs CATY's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs PFBC's +20.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs NTB's 0.5% |
NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
CATY leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • PFBC leads 0 • HAFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTB leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CATY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 3.1x HAFC's $445M. NTB is the more profitable business, keeping 29.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $800M | $1.4B | $968M | $499M | $445M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $267M | $431M | $84M | $191M | $110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $232M | $315M | $59M | $134M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $255M | $357M | $147M | $167M | $204M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.9% | +55.1% | +48.6% | +55.0% | +57.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +29.4% | +8.3% | +38.0% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +22.8% | +6.0% | +26.8% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +26.3% | +15.6% | +33.4% | +45.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | +18.8% | +35.0% | +24.0% | +20.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NTB and HOPE and PFBC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 67% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PFBC offers better value at 0.52x vs CATY's 1.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $3.8B | $1.6B | $1.2B | $908M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $679M | $3.9B | $1.4B | $730M | $976M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.28x | 12.55x | 27.22x | 9.10x | 12.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.91x | 10.48x | 11.60x | 8.94x | 9.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.76x | 1.31x | — | 0.52x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.55x | 9.00x | 17.18x | 3.85x | 8.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.81x | 2.76x | 1.66x | 2.31x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 1.32x | 0.71x | 1.54x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.81x | 10.50x | 10.58x | 6.92x | 4.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTB delivers a 21.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. NTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFBC's 0.49x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs PFBC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.2% | +10.9% | +2.6% | +17.3% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +1.3% | +0.3% | +1.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +9.8% | +2.3% | +13.5% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.5% | +0.9% | +4.4% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.07x | 0.17x | 0.49x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | $63M | -$164M | -$423M | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $146M | $560M | $807M | $213M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $209M | $396M | $384M | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 0.72x | 0.17x | 0.88x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,800 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, NTB leads with a +42.7% total return vs PFBC's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTB at 36.7% vs HOPE's 21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.1% | +17.9% | +15.3% | +0.4% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +42.7% | +39.5% | +30.4% | +20.9% | +36.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.3% | +116.0% | +80.7% | +126.1% | +137.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.4% | +51.2% | -2.0% | +56.6% | +64.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.3% | +137.4% | +18.8% | +256.1% | +76.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.7% | +29.3% | +21.8% | +31.3% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NTB and CATY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CATY currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PFBC's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 1.01x | 1.11x | 0.67x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $57.84 | $58.00 | $13.02 | $103.05 | $31.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.32 | $41.64 | $9.44 | $79.60 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +98.3% | +96.2% | +91.9% | +97.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.8 | 70.8 | 59.1 | 59.1 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 465K | 902K | 102K | 265K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CATY and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTB as "Hold", CATY as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold", PFBC as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for HOPE (target: $15) vs -17.5% for CATY (target: $47). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs CATY's 2.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $57.00 | $47.00 | $14.50 | $102.00 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 13 | 6 | 10 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +2.4% | +4.4% | +3.1% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.83 | $1.38 | $0.55 | $2.98 | $1.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.5% | +4.7% | 0.0% | +8.1% | +1.0% |
NTB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
NTB vs CATY vs HOPE vs PFBC vs HAFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC?
On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.
1x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Preferred Bank wins at 0. 51x versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.
7%, compared to -2. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +257. 1% versus HOPE's +19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 65β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 11β — meaning HOPE is approximately 71% more volatile than NTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 49% for Preferred Bank — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC?
The Bank of N.
T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 0% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTB leads at 75. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 51x versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Bank of N. T. Butterfield & Son Limited (NTB) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 6x for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOPE: 15. 8% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 4% for Cathay General Bancorp (CATY).
09Is NTB or CATY or HOPE or PFBC or HAFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 3. 1% yield, +257. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +257. 1%, HOPE: +19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTB and CATY and HOPE and PFBC and HAFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CATY is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.