Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Asset Management
Banks - Diversified
Financial - Capital Markets
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Asset Management | Banks - Diversified | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $29.66B | $825.89B | $41.99B | $244.81B | $287.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.30B | $270.79B | $21.97B | $125.40B | $126.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.74B | $58.03B | $2.98B | $21.06B | $16.67B |
| Gross Margin | 56.5% | 58.6% | 58.5% | 62.2% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 27.7% | 15.5% | 18.6% | 14.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.8x | 13.8x | 12.0x | 11.3x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $16.43B | $751.15B | $36.79B | $281.88B | $616.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61.13B | $469.32B | $116.10B | $203.36B | $182.09B |
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Trust Corp… (NTRS) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 314.8 | +214.8% |
| State Street Corpor… (STT) | 100 | 244.1 | +144.1% |
| Wells Fargo & Compa… (WFC) | 100 | 299.1 | +199.1% |
| The Goldman Sachs G… (GS) | 100 | 471.2 | +371.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NTRS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 1.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, current ratio 0.65x
- PEG 1.06 vs WFC's 2.02
- Beta 1.00, yield 1.7%, current ratio 0.65x
STT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.6%, EPS growth 47.1%
- 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9%
- 2.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7%
WFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 2.5% vs GS's 0.5%
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 15.6x)
- Beta 1.00 vs GS's 1.47, lower leverage
GS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs JPM's 461.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- +70.6% vs WFC's +10.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.6% NII/revenue growth vs NTRS's -9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 15.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs GS's 1.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.6% vs WFC's +10.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WFC's 0.4% |
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories
WFC leads 1 • NTRS leads 1 • GS leads 1 • STT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $270.8B annually — 18.9x NTRS's $14.3B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GS's 11.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.3B | $270.8B | $22.0B | $125.4B | $126.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.2B | $81.3B | $4.3B | $31.6B | $23.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.7B | $58.0B | $3.0B | $21.1B | $16.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.7B | -$119.7B | -$6.1B | -$14.2B | $15.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.5% | +58.6% | +58.5% | +62.2% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +27.7% | +15.5% | +18.6% | +14.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +21.6% | +12.2% | +15.7% | +11.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | -15.5% | -64.3% | +2.4% | -12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.1% | +16.0% | +23.0% | +16.9% | +45.8% |
Valuation Metrics
WFC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, WFC trades at a 35% valuation discount to GS's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.19x vs WFC's 2.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.7B | $825.9B | $42.0B | $244.8B | $287.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$15.0B | $1.11T | -$37.3B | $323.3B | $722.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.31x | 15.51x | 18.12x | 14.74x | 22.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.80x | 13.79x | 11.99x | 11.33x | 15.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.86x | 1.19x | 2.05x | 2.63x | 1.63x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.68x | 13.34x | -9.33x | 10.46x | 34.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.07x | 3.05x | 1.91x | 1.95x | 2.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.33x | 2.56x | 1.78x | 1.52x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.43x | — | — | 80.66x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTRS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JPM delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $11 for STT. NTRS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GS's 5.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTRS scores 6/9 vs GS's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.4% | +16.1% | +10.8% | +11.5% | +12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.3% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +5.4% | +4.6% | +3.7% | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +8.2% | +4.6% | +5.0% | +3.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 2.18x | 1.45x | 1.56x | 5.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44.7B | $281.8B | -$79.3B | $78.5B | $434.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61.1B | $469.3B | $116.1B | $203.4B | $182.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $16.4B | $751.1B | $36.8B | $281.9B | $616.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 0.74x | 0.42x | 0.60x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GS five years ago would be worth $26,440 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,665 for NTRS. Over the past 12 months, GS leads with a +70.6% total return vs WFC's +10.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GS at 43.5% vs WFC's 29.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.5% | -5.0% | +16.6% | -16.4% | +1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.6% | +25.2% | +66.2% | +10.6% | +70.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.7% | +134.6% | +128.4% | +117.6% | +195.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | +104.3% | +86.2% | +83.9% | +164.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.2% | +461.3% | +186.8% | +90.0% | +534.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +32.9% | +31.7% | +29.6% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STT and WFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WFC is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GS's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs WFC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.00x | 1.19x | 1.00x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $173.19 | $337.25 | $156.18 | $97.76 | $984.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $97.00 | $248.83 | $90.94 | $71.90 | $547.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +90.8% | +95.3% | +81.0% | +94.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 59.4 | 63.9 | 47.5 | 59.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 8.3M | 2.0M | 15.0M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — JPM and STT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NTRS as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", STT as "Buy", WFC as "Hold", GS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.0% upside for WFC (target: $98) vs -3.9% for NTRS (target: $154). For income investors, STT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.30% vs GS's 1.46%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.75 | $338.78 | $160.44 | $98.13 | $995.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 61 | 37 | 60 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.7% | +2.3% | +1.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.14 | $5.13 | $3.42 | $1.48 | $13.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.3% | +3.5% | +6.9% | +9.1% | +3.5% |
JPM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WFC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NTRS vs JPM vs STT vs WFC vs GS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, State Street Corporation (STT) is the stronger pick with 19.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (11. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS?
On trailing P/E, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Wells Fargo & Company is actually cheaper at 11. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 06x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 02x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS?
Over the past 5 years, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
(GS) delivered a total return of +164. 4%, compared to +46. 7% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GS returned +534. 3% versus WFC's +90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
00β versus The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning GS is approximately 47% more volatile than WFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 127% versus 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), State Street Corporation (STT) is pulling ahead at 19.
6% versus -9. 9% for Northern Trust Corporation (NTRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. grew EPS 77. 3% year-over-year, compared to -10. 5% for Northern Trust Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 6% net margin versus 11. 3% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 27. 7% versus 14. 5% for GS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WFC leads at 62. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus Wells Fargo & Company's 2. 02x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 6x for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WFC: 24. 0% to $98. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
State Street Corporation (STT) offers the highest yield at 2. 3%, versus 1. 5% for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
09Is NTRS or JPM or STT or WFC or GS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 1. 7% yield, +461. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +461. 3%, GS: +534. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NTRS and JPM and STT and WFC and GS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NTRS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; STT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WFC is a large-cap deep-value stock; GS is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.