Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.44B | $5.29B | $3.09B | $699M | $1.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $599M | $1.45B | $627M | $315M | $968M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $458M | $-398M | $69M | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 58.2% | 65.6% | 5.8% | 69.6% | 48.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 36.0% | -84.2% | 25.8% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 10.8x | 10.3x | 9.6x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $1.20B | $641M | $117M | $396M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $73M | $910M | $380M | $52M | $560M |
OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) | 100 | 223.4 | +123.4% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.29 vs HOMB's 3.55
- PEG 1.29 vs 3.55
- +46.1% vs HOMB's -1.9%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- NIM 3.8% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SFNC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | PEG 1.29 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs HOPE's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.1% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOMB leads 1 • OBK leads 0 • SFNC leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.6x IBCP's $315M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $599M | $1.5B | $627M | $315M | $968M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $113M | $601M | -$497M | $89M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $458M | -$398M | $69M | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $149M | $354M | $755M | $70M | $147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.2% | +65.6% | +5.8% | +69.6% | +48.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +36.0% | -84.2% | +25.8% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +27.7% | -63.4% | +21.7% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +29.1% | +71.7% | +22.2% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.5% | +26.0% | +42.1% | +2.3% | +35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBCP offers better value at 1.97x vs HOMB's 4.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $5.3B | $3.1B | $699M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $5.6B | $3.4B | $764M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.42x | 13.36x | -7.24x | 10.38x | 27.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.81x | 10.82x | 10.35x | 9.56x | 11.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.13x | 4.39x | — | 1.97x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.40x | 10.12x | — | 9.39x | 17.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 3.64x | 4.93x | 2.22x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.36x | 0.84x | 1.41x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.56x | 12.53x | 6.88x | 9.96x | 10.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HOMB and IBCP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. OBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +10.9% | -11.6% | +14.2% | +2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.0% | -1.6% | +1.3% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +7.2% | -9.1% | +10.2% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +9.8% | -4.2% | +2.6% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.30x | 0.19x | 0.23x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | $292M | $261M | $65M | -$164M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $73M | $910M | $380M | $52M | $560M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $1.2B | $641M | $117M | $396M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.48x | 1.44x | -1.01x | 0.91x | 0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, OBK leads with a +46.1% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.2% | -3.0% | +14.6% | +7.2% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.1% | -1.9% | +16.7% | +12.6% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.9% | +42.0% | +53.4% | +130.6% | +80.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +6.6% | -15.4% | +63.7% | -2.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.1% | +58.2% | +25.2% | +184.6% | +18.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.7% | +12.4% | +15.3% | +32.1% | +21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — OBK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HOPE's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OBK currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.82x | 1.02x | 0.83x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.12 | $30.83 | $22.18 | $37.39 | $13.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.13 | $25.68 | $17.00 | $29.63 | $9.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +87.1% | +96.3% | +90.8% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.8 | 50.3 | 62.3 | 50.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 176K | 1.4M | 1.2M | 176K | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OBK as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", HOPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 6.1% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs OBK's 1.30%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.50 | $32.00 | $22.67 | $38.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 19 | 9 | 7 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +2.8% | +4.0% | +3.0% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $0.75 | $0.85 | $1.03 | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.1% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). HOMB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
OBK vs HOMB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs HOPE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Origin Bancorp, Inc. wins at 1. 29x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus HOPE's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning HOPE is approximately 34% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 3. 6% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 29x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Origin Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Origin Bancorp, Inc. (OBK).
09Is OBK or HOMB or SFNC or IBCP or HOPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OBK and HOMB and SFNC and IBCP and HOPE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.