Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ONIT
Onity Group Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$323M
5Y Perf.+59.8%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.62B
5Y Perf.-6.3%
SVC
Service Properties Trust

REIT - Hotel & Motel

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$259M
5Y Perf.-70.0%
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$39.90B
5Y Perf.+3.1%
UWMC
UWM Holdings Corporation

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$526M
5Y Perf.-51.2%

ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ONIT logoONIT
PFSI logoPFSI
SVC logoSVC
RKT logoRKT
UWMC logoUWMC
IndustryFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - MortgagesREIT - Hotel & MotelFinancial - MortgagesFinancial - Mortgages
Market Cap$323M$4.62B$259M$39.90B$526M
Revenue (TTM)$1.07B$4.36B$1.74B$6.88B$3.16B
Net Income (TTM)$175M$507M$-237M$-68M$27M
Gross Margin94.5%91.4%-11.2%91.6%85.6%
Operating Margin55.3%34.6%9.8%8.7%58.0%
Forward P/E3.8x7.2x19.3x8.0x
Total Debt$15.18B$23.06B$5.48B$0.00$14.44B
Cash & Equiv.$181M$302M$347M$2.70B$503M

ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ONIT
PFSI
SVC
RKT
UWMC
StockJun 24May 26Return
Onity Group Inc. (ONIT)100159.8+59.8%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)10093.7-6.3%
Service Properties … (SVC)10030.0-70.0%
Rocket Companies, I… (RKT)100103.1+3.1%
UWM Holdings Corpor… (UWMC)10048.8-51.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFSI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. Onity Group Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SVC and RKT also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ONIT
Onity Group Inc.
The Banking Pick

ONIT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.

  • Beta 1.12, yield 1.3%, current ratio 51.26x
  • Lower P/E (3.8x vs 19.3x)
  • 17.8% margin vs SVC's -13.6%
Best for: defensive
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 1.3%
  • Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs ONIT's 55.4%
  • 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs SVC's -4.3%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SVC
Service Properties Trust
The Real Estate Income Play

SVC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 21.11x
  • Beta 0.80 vs RKT's 1.77
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
RKT
Rocket Companies, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +21.6% vs SVC's -21.4%
Best for: momentum
UWMC
UWM Holdings Corporation
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, UWMC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFSI logoPFSI173.8% NII/revenue growth vs SVC's -4.3%
ValueONIT logoONITLower P/E (3.8x vs 19.3x)
Quality / MarginsONIT logoONIT17.8% margin vs SVC's -13.6%
Stability / SafetySVC logoSVCBeta 0.80 vs RKT's 1.77
DividendsPFSI logoPFSI1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs UWMC's 100.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)RKT logoRKT+21.6% vs SVC's -21.4%
Efficiency (ROA)PFSI logoPFSI1.8% ROA vs SVC's -3.6%, ROIC 4.4% vs 2.4%

ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ONITOnity Group Inc.
FY 2025
Servicing
85.3%$910M
Lending
14.7%$157M
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M
SVCService Properties Trust
FY 2025
Hotel Segment
77.9%$1.4B
Net Lease Segment
22.1%$401M
RKTRocket Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Direct To Customer Segment
87.8%$4.8B
Partner Network Segment
12.2%$668M
UWMCUWM Holdings Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLONITLAGGINGUWMC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ONIT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

RKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.9B annually — 6.4x ONIT's $1.1B. ONIT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SVC's -13.6%.

MetricONIT logoONITOnity Group Inc.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SVC logoSVCService Propertie…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.1B$4.4B$1.7B$6.9B$3.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$324M$1.0B$191M$639M$695M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$175M$507M-$237M-$68M$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$502M-$3.8B-$2M-$4.1B-$2.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+94.5%+91.4%-11.2%+91.6%+85.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+55.3%+34.6%+9.8%+8.7%+58.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+17.8%+11.5%-13.6%-1.0%+0.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-105.4%-32.4%-0.1%-58.4%-86.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-16.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-70.4%+7.7%-30.0%-89.6%
ONIT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SVC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 1.8x trailing earnings, ONIT trades at a 94% valuation discount to UWMC's 28.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UWMC's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RKT's 41.8x.

MetricONIT logoONITOnity Group Inc.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SVC logoSVCService Propertie…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…
Market CapShares × price$323M$4.6B$259M$39.9B$526M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15.3B$27.4B$5.4B$37.2B$14.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS1.79x9.53x-1.26x-282.60x28.17x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.84x7.17x19.30x8.01x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.75x18.11x14.55x41.81x7.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.30x1.06x0.14x5.80x0.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.53x1.11x0.40x0.82x0.45x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF2.20x
SVC leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — PFSI and UWMC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

ONIT delivers a 29.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-38 for SVC. PFSI carries lower financial leverage with a 5.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ONIT's 24.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SVC scores 5/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricONIT logoONITOnity Group Inc.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SVC logoSVCService Propertie…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+29.9%+12.0%-38.2%-0.6%+1.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+1.8%-3.6%-0.2%+0.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.9%+4.4%+2.4%+2.0%+8.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.7%+10.4%+3.0%+1.6%+19.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944525
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage24.17x5.35x8.48x9.06x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$15.0B$22.8B$5.1B-$2.7B$13.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$181M$302M$347M$2.7B$503M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$15.2B$23.1B$5.5B$0$14.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.75x1.35x0.50x0.43x0.75x
Evenly matched — PFSI and UWMC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

RKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PFSI five years ago would be worth $16,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,699 for SVC. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs SVC's -21.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKT at 21.0% vs SVC's -33.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricONIT logoONITOnity Group Inc.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SVC logoSVCService Propertie…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-13.2%-32.4%-17.9%-28.9%-21.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+3.3%-8.0%-21.4%+21.6%-7.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.4%+59.2%-70.7%+77.3%-21.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.4%+63.7%-73.0%-11.9%-22.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.4%+603.4%-57.6%-20.7%-41.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.8%+16.8%-33.6%+21.0%-7.8%
RKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ONIT and SVC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SVC is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ONIT currently trades 70.8% from its 52-week high vs UWMC's 47.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricONIT logoONITOnity Group Inc.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SVC logoSVCService Propertie…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x0.93x0.80x1.77x1.50x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$54.10$160.36$3.08$24.36$7.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$35.47$82.67$1.13$11.08$3.27
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.8%+55.3%+50.0%+58.0%+47.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10036.140.452.345.842.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K604K9.5M25.0M15.7M
Evenly matched — ONIT and SVC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PFSI and UWMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ONIT as "Buy", PFSI as "Buy", SVC as "Hold", RKT as "Hold", UWMC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 311.0% upside for SVC (target: $6) vs 53.1% for RKT (target: $22). For income investors, UWMC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs ONIT's 1.27%.

MetricONIT logoONITOnity Group Inc.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…SVC logoSVCService Propertie…RKT logoRKTRocket Companies,…UWMC logoUWMCUWM Holdings Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$60.00$143.00$6.33$21.63$5.98
# AnalystsCovering analysts320152513
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.3%+1.3%+100.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12011
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.49$1.16$3.39
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%+0.3%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — PFSI and UWMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ONIT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SVC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallOnity Group Inc. (ONIT)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ONIT vs PFSI vs SVC vs RKT vs UWMC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Service Properties Trust (SVC). Onity Group Inc. (ONIT) offers the better valuation at 1. 8x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Onity Group Inc. (ONIT) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC?

On trailing P/E, Onity Group Inc.

(ONIT) is the cheapest at 1. 8x versus UWM Holdings Corporation at 28. 2x. On forward P/E, Onity Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 3. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC?

Over the past 5 years, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) delivered a total return of +63. 7%, compared to -73. 0% for Service Properties Trust (SVC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus SVC's -57. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Service Properties Trust (SVC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

80β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 121% more volatile than SVC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 24% for Onity Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus -4. 3% for Service Properties Trust (SVC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Onity Group Inc. grew EPS 419. 6% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC?

Onity Group Inc.

(ONIT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -11. 1% for Service Properties Trust — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UWMC leads at 58. 0% versus 8. 7% for RKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONIT leads at 94. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Onity Group Inc.

(ONIT) trades at 3. 8x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Rocket Companies, Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SVC: 311. 0% to $6. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC?

In this comparison, UWMC (100.

0% yield), PFSI (1. 3% yield), ONIT (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. SVC, RKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ONIT or PFSI or SVC or RKT or UWMC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 1. 3% yield, +603. 4% 10Y return). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFSI: +603. 4%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ONIT and PFSI and SVC and RKT and UWMC?

These companies operate in different sectors (ONIT (Financial Services) and PFSI (Financial Services) and SVC (Real Estate) and RKT (Financial Services) and UWMC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ONIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; SVC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UWMC is a small-cap high-growth stock. ONIT, PFSI, UWMC pay a dividend while SVC, RKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ONIT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SVC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UWMC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 32%
  • Gross Margin > 51%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ONIT and PFSI and SVC and RKT and UWMC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ONIT: -0.2% · PFSI: 173.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(ONIT: 17.8% · PFSI: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(ONIT: 1.8x · PFSI: 9.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.