Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $217M | $613M | $908M | $1.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $167M | $233M | $445M | $499M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $63M | $76M | $134M |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 79.4% | 57.5% | 55.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 37.8% | 24.3% | 38.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 11.4x | 9.6x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $122M | $72M | $280M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $434M | $52M | $213M | $807M |
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OP Bancorp (OPBK) | 100 | 230.1 | +130.1% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPBK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 8.9x)
BCAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- PEG 0.36 vs HAFC's 0.76
- NIM 4.2% vs OPBK's 3.0%
- 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
HAFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PFBC's 3.1%
- +36.9% vs OPBK's +20.7%
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 256.1% 10Y total return vs OPBK's 210.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 8.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs OPBK's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs PFBC's 3.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs OPBK's +20.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAFC leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCAL leads 1 • OPBK leads 1 • PFBC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCAL leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $499M annually — 3.0x OPBK's $167M. BCAL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPBK's 15.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $167M | $233M | $445M | $499M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $92M | $110M | $191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | $63M | $76M | $134M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $57M | $204M | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +79.4% | +57.5% | +55.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +37.8% | +24.3% | +38.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +27.1% | +17.1% | +26.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +24.4% | +45.8% | +33.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.4% | -2.0% | +20.7% | +24.0% |
Valuation Metrics
OPBK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, OPBK trades at a 30% valuation discount to HAFC's 12.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs HAFC's 0.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $217M | $613M | $908M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$95M | $633M | $976M | $730M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.48x | 9.88x | 12.10x | 9.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.78x | 11.42x | 9.61x | 8.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.56x | 0.31x | 0.95x | 0.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -2.23x | 7.19x | 8.59x | 3.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 2.63x | 2.04x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.08x | 1.15x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.30x | 10.77x | 4.46x | 6.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BCAL and PFBC each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $10 for HAFC. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPBK's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs PFBC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +11.4% | +9.8% | +17.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +10.6% | +7.4% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.0% | +2.5% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.12x | 0.35x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$312M | $20M | $68M | -$423M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $434M | $52M | $213M | $807M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122M | $72M | $280M | $384M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.55x | 0.62x | 0.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,274 for BCAL. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs OPBK's +20.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs BCAL's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.2% | +3.3% | +15.2% | +0.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | +32.9% | +36.9% | +20.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.7% | +47.7% | +137.2% | +126.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.5% | +42.7% | +64.7% | +56.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.6% | +133.6% | +76.5% | +256.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.3% | +13.9% | +33.4% | +31.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAFC and PFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPBK's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs PFBC's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.90x | 0.92x | 0.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.27 | $20.47 | $31.27 | $103.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.52 | $14.07 | $21.84 | $79.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +93.2% | +97.2% | +91.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 62.0 | 64.1 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 189K | 265K | 102K |
Analyst Outlook
HAFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPBK as "Buy", BCAL as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", PFBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for OPBK (target: $17) vs 7.7% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, HAFC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.57% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $22.00 | $35.00 | $102.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 | 11 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +0.5% | +3.6% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $0.10 | $1.09 | $2.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.0% | +1.0% | +8.1% |
HAFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). BCAL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). OP Bancorp (OPBK) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OP Bancorp (OPBK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC?
On trailing P/E, OP Bancorp (OPBK) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation at 12. 1x. On forward P/E, OP Bancorp is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 76x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.
7%, compared to +42. 7% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +256. 1% versus HAFC's +76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus OP Bancorp's 0. 94β — meaning OPBK is approximately 35% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 54% for OP Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to 7. 9% for Preferred Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC?
Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
1% net margin versus 15. 4% for OP Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFBC leads at 38. 0% versus 21. 2% for OPBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCAL leads at 79. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Hanmi Financial Corporation's 0. 76x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OP Bancorp (OPBK) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Southern California Bancorp — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPBK: 16. 5% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 3. 1% yield, +256. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +256. 1%, HAFC: +76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPBK and BCAL and HAFC and PFBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.