Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $217M | $613M | $908M | $1.15B | $2.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $167M | $233M | $445M | $499M | $643M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $63M | $76M | $134M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 79.4% | 57.5% | 55.0% | 79.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.2% | 37.8% | 24.3% | 38.0% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 11.4x | 9.6x | 8.9x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $122M | $72M | $280M | $384M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $434M | $52M | $213M | $807M | $108M |
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| OP Bancorp (OPBK) | 100 | 230.1 | +130.1% |
| Southern California… (BCAL) | 100 | 217.9 | +117.9% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| Preferred Bank (PFBC) | 100 | 252.1 | +152.1% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OPBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (7.8x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.51 vs 4.48
BCAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
- PEG 0.36 vs CVBF's 4.48
- NIM 4.2% vs CVBF's 2.9%
- 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
HAFC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- +36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1%
PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 256.1% 10Y total return vs OPBK's 210.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
- Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAFC's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.8x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.51 vs 4.48 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs OPBK's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs HAFC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% |
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
OPBK leads 1 • PFBC leads 1 • HAFC leads 1 • BCAL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF is the larger business by revenue, generating $643M annually — 3.9x OPBK's $167M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPBK's 15.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $167M | $233M | $445M | $499M | $643M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $92M | $110M | $191M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | $63M | $76M | $134M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $57M | $204M | $167M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +79.4% | +57.5% | +55.0% | +79.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +37.8% | +24.3% | +38.0% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.4% | +27.1% | +17.1% | +26.8% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +24.4% | +45.8% | +33.4% | +33.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.4% | -2.0% | +20.7% | +24.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
OPBK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, OPBK trades at a 37% valuation discount to CVBF's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs CVBF's 4.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $217M | $613M | $908M | $1.2B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$95M | $633M | $976M | $730M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.48x | 9.88x | 12.10x | 9.10x | 13.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.78x | 11.42x | 9.61x | 8.91x | 14.24x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.56x | 0.31x | 0.95x | 0.52x | 4.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -2.23x | 7.19x | 8.59x | 3.85x | 13.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 2.63x | 2.04x | 2.31x | 4.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 1.08x | 1.15x | 1.54x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.30x | 10.77x | 4.46x | 6.92x | 12.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OPBK's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.8% | +11.4% | +9.8% | +17.3% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +1.6% | +1.0% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +10.6% | +7.4% | +13.5% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +5.0% | +2.5% | +4.4% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.12x | 0.35x | 0.49x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$312M | $20M | $68M | -$423M | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $434M | $52M | $213M | $807M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122M | $72M | $280M | $384M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.55x | 0.62x | 0.88x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,217 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs BCAL's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.2% | +3.3% | +15.2% | +0.4% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | +32.9% | +36.9% | +20.9% | +13.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.7% | +47.7% | +137.2% | +126.1% | +94.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +54.5% | +42.7% | +64.7% | +56.6% | +12.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.6% | +133.6% | +76.5% | +256.1% | +67.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.3% | +13.9% | +33.4% | +31.3% | +24.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAFC and PFBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPBK's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HAFC currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs PFBC's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.90x | 0.92x | 0.69x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.27 | $20.47 | $31.27 | $103.05 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.52 | $14.07 | $21.84 | $79.60 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +93.2% | +97.2% | +91.9% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.0 | 62.0 | 64.1 | 59.1 | 57.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 189K | 265K | 102K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HAFC and PFBC and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OPBK as "Buy", BCAL as "Buy", HAFC as "Hold", PFBC as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 7.7% for PFBC (target: $102). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BCAL's 0.52%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $22.00 | $35.00 | $102.00 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +0.5% | +3.6% | +3.1% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $0.10 | $1.09 | $2.98 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.0% | +1.0% | +8.1% | +2.9% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OPBK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
OPBK vs BCAL vs HAFC vs PFBC vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). OP Bancorp (OPBK) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate OP Bancorp (OPBK) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, OP Bancorp (OPBK) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus CVB Financial Corp. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, OP Bancorp is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.
7%, compared to +12. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +256. 1% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus OP Bancorp's 0. 94β — meaning OPBK is approximately 35% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 54% for OP Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.
2% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 15. 4% for OP Bancorp — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 21. 2% for OPBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OP Bancorp (OPBK) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).
09Is OPBK or BCAL or HAFC or PFBC or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 3. 1% yield, +256. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +256. 1%, CVBF: +67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OPBK and BCAL and HAFC and PFBC and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OPBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.