Insurance - Reinsurance
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $8M | $861M | $1.99B | $12.98B | $33.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $847M | $927M | $11.49B | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $196M | $314M | $3.09B | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | -2.5% | 47.2% | 66.5% | 44.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -126.8% | 31.7% | 47.9% | 35.5% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.1x | 9.2x | 7.7x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $266K | $100M | $68M | $2.33B | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $559M | $1.21B | $1.73B | $993M |
OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oxbridge Re Holding… (OXBR) | 100 | 98.0 | -2.0% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
OXBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 107.7% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7%
HRTG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.1x vs 10.1x)
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.24x
RNR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +21.9% vs OXBR's -35.1%
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.02 vs OXBR's 2.69
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 107.7% revenue growth vs HRTG's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.1x vs 10.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs OXBR's 4.0 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs OXBR's 2.69 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs RNR's 0.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs OXBR's -35.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs OXBR's -35.1%, ROIC 6.8% vs -33.8% |
OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
HRTG leads 2 • RNR leads 1 • OXBR leads 0 • ACGL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 8224.9x OXBR's $2M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OXBR's -128.4%. On growth, OXBR holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $847M | $927M | $11.5B | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $281M | $454M | $4.1B | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $196M | $314M | $3.1B | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $177M | $431M | $4.2B | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +47.2% | +66.5% | +44.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -126.8% | +31.7% | +47.9% | +35.5% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -128.4% | +23.1% | +33.9% | +26.9% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -72.8% | +20.8% | +46.4% | +36.7% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +2.4% | +11.9% | -36.4% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.3% | +2.3% | +23.4% | +100.9% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 45% valuation discount to ACGL's 8.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs ACGL's 0.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $861M | $2.0B | $13.0B | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $402M | $844M | $13.6B | $35.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.18x | 4.44x | 6.15x | 5.31x | 8.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.07x | 9.19x | 7.66x | 10.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.06x | 0.13x | 0.18x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 1.48x | 1.92x | 3.38x | 6.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.76x | 1.02x | 2.20x | 1.02x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | 1.72x | 1.77x | 0.70x | 1.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.94x | 4.47x | 3.51x | 5.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-45 for OXBR. HCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRTG's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs OXBR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -45.2% | +47.3% | +32.0% | +16.6% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.1% | +8.4% | +13.2% | +5.7% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -33.8% | +15.4% | +6.8% | +16.0% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.7% | +11.1% | +40.6% | +10.7% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.20x | 0.06x | 0.12x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$459M | -$1.1B | $598M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $559M | $1.2B | $1.7B | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266,000 | $100M | $68M | $2.3B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 33.88x | 67.24x | 33.28x | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,601 for OXBR. Over the past 12 months, RNR leads with a +21.9% total return vs OXBR's -35.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs OXBR's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.2% | +2.7% | -16.7% | +10.6% | +0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.1% | +15.3% | +2.4% | +21.9% | +2.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.6% | +585.3% | +209.6% | +45.7% | +30.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | +201.4% | +105.3% | +87.1% | +144.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.3% | +119.4% | +436.8% | +176.9% | +324.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.3% | +89.9% | +45.7% | +13.4% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OXBR's 2.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs OXBR's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.69x | 0.50x | 0.39x | -0.03x | 0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.86 | $31.98 | $210.50 | $318.20 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.66 | $16.83 | $136.37 | $231.17 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.3% | +87.6% | +72.6% | +94.5% | +91.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.9 | 55.7 | 48.7 | 46.9 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 712K | 282K | 167K | 303K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
HCI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRTG as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", RNR as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, HCI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.98% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.00 | $126.50 | $308.33 | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 14 | 28 | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.0% | +0.6% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.50 | $1.67 | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.1% | +12.3% | +5.6% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HRTG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
OXBR vs HRTG vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (OXBR) is the stronger pick with 107.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. at 8. 1x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HCI Group, Inc. wins at 0. 19x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -54. 0% for Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (OXBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus OXBR's -65. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited's 2. 69β — meaning OXBR is approximately -8565% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 20% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (OXBR) is pulling ahead at 107.
7% versus 3. 7% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to 3. 8% for Arch Capital Group Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus -323. 1% for Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus -297. 6% for OXBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 1x for Arch Capital Group Ltd. — 4. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 39. 1% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL?
In this comparison, HCI (1.
0% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. OXBR, HRTG, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is OXBR or HRTG or HCI or RNR or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Oxbridge Re Holdings Limited (OXBR) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, OXBR: -65. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between OXBR and HRTG and HCI and RNR and ACGL?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: OXBR is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. HCI, RNR pay a dividend while OXBR, HRTG, ACGL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.