Financial - Mortgages
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PAPL vs GHLD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
PAPL vs GHLD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Mortgages | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $2M | $439M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $1.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $126M |
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 90.6% |
| Operating Margin | -98.7% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.2x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $3.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $118M |
PAPL vs GHLD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pineapple Financial… (PAPL) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| Guild Holdings Comp… (GHLD) | 100 | 166.4 | +66.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PAPL vs GHLD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.01, current ratio 0.77x
- Beta -0.01, current ratio 0.77x
- Better valuation composite
GHLD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 60.9%, EPS growth 343.8%
- 58.4% 10Y total return vs PAPL's -97.5%
- 60.9% NII/revenue growth vs PAPL's 11.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 60.9% NII/revenue growth vs PAPL's 11.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.8% vs PAPL's 1.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (146.6% vs 242.0%) | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.1% vs PAPL's -48.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.8% vs PAPL's 1.4% |
PAPL vs GHLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PAPL vs GHLD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHLD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 393.3x PAPL's $3M. GHLD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PAPL's -121.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $199M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $126M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +90.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -98.7% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -121.8% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -31.7% | -56.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.1% | +148.6% |
Valuation Metrics
PAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $439M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $750,792 | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.21x | 12.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 0.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GHLD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GHLD delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PAPL. PAPL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GHLD's 2.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PAPL scores 5/9 vs GHLD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -88.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -96.9% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -115.3% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.47x | 2.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$788,292 | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $118M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $3.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -21.03x | 1.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GHLD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GHLD five years ago would be worth $16,569 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $254 for PAPL. Over the past 12 months, GHLD leads with a +62.1% total return vs PAPL's -48.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GHLD at 30.4% vs PAPL's -70.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.0% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.5% | +62.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +121.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +65.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | +58.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.6% | +30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PAPL and GHLD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PAPL is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHLD's 0.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GHLD currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs PAPL's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.01x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.53 | $23.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $11.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.0% | +84.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.1 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 152K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
GHLD is the only dividend payer here at 2.47% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.49 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +31.7% | +0.3% |
GHLD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PAPL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PAPL vs GHLD: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PAPL or GHLD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger pick with 60.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 1% for Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL). Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) a "Hold" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PAPL or GHLD?
Over the past 5 years, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) delivered a total return of +65.
7%, compared to -97. 5% for Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GHLD returned +58. 4% versus PAPL's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PAPL or GHLD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pineapple Financial Inc.
(PAPL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Guild Holdings Company's 0. 04β — meaning GHLD is approximately -482% more volatile than PAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 147% versus 2% for Guild Holdings Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PAPL or GHLD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is pulling ahead at 60.
9% versus 11. 1% for Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Guild Holdings Company grew EPS 343. 8% year-over-year, compared to -857. 9% for Pineapple Financial Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PAPL or GHLD?
Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus -121. 8% for Pineapple Financial Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GHLD leads at 10. 1% versus -98. 7% for PAPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GHLD leads at 90. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PAPL or GHLD?
In this comparison, GHLD (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. PAPL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PAPL or GHLD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Guild Holdings Company (GHLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
04), 2. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHLD: +58. 4%, PAPL: -97. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PAPL and GHLD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PAPL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GHLD is a small-cap high-growth stock. GHLD pays a dividend while PAPL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.