Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $373M | $508M | $2.35B | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $344M | $867M | $730M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $32M | $169M | $111M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 44.1% | 72.1% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 9.0% | 25.3% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 19.6x | 12.9x | 10.8x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.26B | $327M | $371M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $167M | $185M | $2.35B |
PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pioneer Bancorp, In… (PBFS) | 100 | 155.9 | +55.9% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 175.0 | +75.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PBFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.67 vs DCOM's 1.68
- Beta 0.52 vs DCOM's 1.05
KRNY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 68.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 10.8x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PBFS's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PBFS's 0.6% |
PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories
PBFS leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • KRNY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PBFS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.8x PBFS's $88M. PBFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $344M | $867M | $730M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $28M | $43M | $241M | $161M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $32M | $169M | $111M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $40M | $225M | $182M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +44.1% | +72.1% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.3% | +9.0% | +25.3% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | +7.6% | +19.5% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +6.2% | +25.2% | +25.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.4% | +50.0% | +39.5% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 31% valuation discount to PBFS's 19.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PBFS offers better value at 0.67x vs DCOM's 2.47x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $373M | $508M | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $254M | $1.6B | $2.5B | -$341M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.59x | 19.24x | 13.53x | 15.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.93x | 10.80x | 10.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | — | 1.92x | 2.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.73x | 44.52x | 10.35x | -2.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.24x | 1.48x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 0.68x | 1.21x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.60x | 23.76x | 10.75x | 9.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs PBFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.68x | 0.17x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$119M | $1.1B | $142M | -$2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $167M | $185M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.3B | $327M | $371M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.87x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +46.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs KRNY's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +12.9% | +9.3% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.6% | +37.9% | +9.0% | +46.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.9% | +32.6% | +54.1% | +129.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.2% | -20.5% | +29.9% | +22.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.9% | -9.0% | +102.2% | +68.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.0% | +9.9% | +15.5% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PBFS and DCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DCOM currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs KRNY's 95.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.83x | 0.89x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.18 | $8.50 | $46.92 | $37.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.09 | $5.76 | $39.20 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +95.1% | +96.1% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.1 | 55.8 | 57.3 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13K | 298K | 236K | 271K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRNY as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", DCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs DCOM's 2.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.50 | $46.00 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.5% | +3.2% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 | $1.43 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +0.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
DCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). PBFS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PBFS vs KRNY vs NBTB vs DCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 6x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 103% more volatile than PBFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -10. 7% for Pioneer Bancorp, Inc. (PBFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM?
Pioneer Bancorp, Inc.
(PBFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 8% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PBFS leads at 37. 3% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PBFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 68x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield) pay a dividend. PBFS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PBFS or KRNY or NBTB or DCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, PBFS: +0. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PBFS and KRNY and NBTB and DCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PBFS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock. KRNY, NBTB, DCOM pay a dividend while PBFS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.