REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $1.65B | $1.33B | $2.26B | $1.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.50B | $1.36B | $2.53B | $986M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-63M | $25M | $-215M | $38M |
| Gross Margin | 12.5% | 1.4% | -4.7% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 9.5% | 11.1% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 593.2x | 24.5x | 129.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.46B | $2.32B | $4.26B | $925M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $184M | $410M | $232M | $109M |
PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pebblebrook Hotel T… (PEB) | 100 | 106.8 | +6.8% |
| RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) | 100 | 85.2 | -14.8% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 114.1 | +14.1% |
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 115.8 | +15.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PEB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +64.4% vs PK's +23.2%
RLJ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 7.0%
- Beta 0.99, yield 7.0%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.99 vs PEB's 1.36
- 7.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PK's 12.5%
PK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (24.5x vs 129.9x)
SHO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth -69.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- 12.0% 10Y total return vs PK's -11.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.5x vs 129.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs PK's -8.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs PEB's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 7.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PK's 12.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.4% vs PK's +23.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 2.0% vs 2.2% |
PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHO leads in 2 of 6 categories
PEB leads 0 • RLJ leads 0 • PK leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 2.6x SHO's $986M. SHO is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, SHO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $1.4B | $2.5B | $986M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $278M | $316M | $612M | $190M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$63M | $25M | -$215M | $38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $257M | $254M | $448M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +1.4% | -4.7% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +9.5% | +11.1% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +1.8% | -8.5% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +18.6% | +17.7% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +3.6% | -1.3% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.7% | -150.0% | +117.2% | +7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PEB and RLJ and PK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 242.3x trailing earnings, SHO trades at a 59% valuation discount to RLJ's 593.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RLJ's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHO's 13.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $1.3B | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $3.2B | $6.3B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -16.21x | 593.24x | -7.90x | 242.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.47x | 129.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.96x | 10.37x | 11.18x | 13.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.12x | 0.99x | 0.89x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.67x | 0.60x | 0.73x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.86x | 11.36x | 22.14x | 24.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHO delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. SHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PK's 1.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLJ scores 6/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +1.1% | -6.7% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +0.5% | -2.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +2.8% | +3.1% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.96x | 1.06x | 1.38x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $1.9B | $4.0B | $816M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $184M | $410M | $232M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $2.3B | $4.3B | $925M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.46x | 1.18x | -0.01x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PEB and PK and SHO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHO five years ago would be worth $9,226 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,361 for PEB. Over the past 12 months, PEB leads with a +64.4% total return vs PK's +23.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PK at 7.3% vs RLJ's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.4% | +16.7% | +6.5% | +13.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +64.4% | +34.6% | +23.2% | +27.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.2% | -3.6% | +23.6% | +9.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.4% | -31.6% | -24.2% | -7.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.3% | -28.7% | -11.3% | +12.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.4% | -1.2% | +7.3% | +3.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLJ and SHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PEB's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHO currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 0.99x | 1.32x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.73 | $8.94 | $12.39 | $10.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.69 | $6.54 | $9.84 | $8.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.0% | +98.2% | +90.6% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.7 | 72.2 | 55.7 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 2.3M | 3.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RLJ and PK and SHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PEB as "Hold", RLJ as "Hold", PK as "Hold", SHO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.5% upside for PK (target: $12) vs -31.7% for RLJ (target: $6). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.54% vs PEB's 0.28%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.65 | $6.00 | $11.50 | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 18 | 25 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +7.0% | +12.5% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.61 | $1.41 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.8% | +2.4% | +2.0% | +5.6% |
SHO leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
PEB vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) offers the better valuation at 242. 3x trailing P/E (129. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB) a "Hold" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO?
On trailing P/E, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the cheapest at 242. 3x versus RLJ Lodging Trust at 593. 2x. On forward P/E, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO?
Over the past 5 years, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) delivered a total return of -7. 7%, compared to -36. 4% for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHO returned +12. 0% versus RLJ's -28. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Pebblebrook Hotel Trust's 1. 36β — meaning PEB is approximately 37% more volatile than RLJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 138% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. grew EPS -69. 8% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLJ leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO?
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RLJ leads at 9. 3% versus 5. 1% for PEB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHO leads at 4. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(PK) trades at 24. 5x forward P/E versus 129. 9x for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — 105. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PK: 2. 5% to $11. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 5%, versus 0. 3% for Pebblebrook Hotel Trust (PEB).
09Is PEB or RLJ or PK or SHO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHO: +12. 0%, PEB: -25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PEB and RLJ and PK and SHO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PEB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RLJ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. RLJ, PK, SHO pay a dividend while PEB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.