Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PFBC
Preferred Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.15B
5Y Perf.+152.1%
BCAL
Southern California Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$613M
5Y Perf.+117.9%
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.78B
5Y Perf.+5.1%
HAFC
Hanmi Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$908M
5Y Perf.+236.4%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.73B
5Y Perf.+37.9%

PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PFBC logoPFBC
BCAL logoBCAL
CVBF logoCVBF
HAFC logoHAFC
WAFD logoWAFD
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$1.15B$613M$2.78B$908M$2.73B
Revenue (TTM)$499M$233M$643M$445M$1.41B
Net Income (TTM)$134M$63M$209M$76M$243M
Gross Margin55.0%79.4%79.9%57.5%50.9%
Operating Margin38.0%37.8%43.8%24.3%20.5%
Forward P/E8.9x11.4x14.2x9.6x10.9x
Total Debt$384M$72M$991M$280M$1.82B
Cash & Equiv.$807M$52M$108M$213M$657M

PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PFBC
BCAL
CVBF
HAFC
WAFD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Preferred Bank (PFBC)100252.1+152.1%
Southern California… (BCAL)100217.9+117.9%
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF)100105.1+5.1%
Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC)100336.4+236.4%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100137.9+37.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PFBC leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Southern California Bancorp is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. CVBF and HAFC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
PFBC
Preferred Bank
The Banking Pick

PFBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 3.1%
  • 256.1% 10Y total return vs BCAL's 133.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 48.6%, current ratio 149.60x
  • Beta 0.69, yield 3.1%, current ratio 149.60x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BCAL
Southern California Bancorp
The Banking Pick

BCAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 7.8%
  • PEG 0.36 vs CVBF's 4.48
  • NIM 4.2% vs WAFD's 2.5%
  • 26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
Best for: growth exposure and valuation efficiency
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

CVBF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.

  • 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0%
Best for: dividends
HAFC
Hanmi Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

HAFC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1%
Best for: momentum
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, WAFD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBCAL logoBCAL26.2% NII/revenue growth vs PFBC's -4.1%
ValuePFBC logoPFBCLower P/E (8.9x vs 14.2x), PEG 0.51 vs 4.48
Quality / MarginsPFBC logoPFBCEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyPFBC logoPFBCBeta 0.69 vs CVBF's 0.94
DividendsCVBF logoCVBF4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WAFD's 3.0%
Momentum (1Y)HAFC logoHAFC+36.9% vs CVBF's +13.1%
Efficiency (ROA)PFBC logoPFBCEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCAL's 0.4%

PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PFBCPreferred Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

BCALSouthern California Bancorp
FY 2025
Deposit Account
100.0%$3M
CVBFCVB Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
52.3%$19M
Fiduciary and Trust
40.4%$15M
Credit Card
7.3%$3M
HAFCHanmi Financial Corporation
FY 2025
Banking Segment
100.0%$270M
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPFBCLAGGINGWAFD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

WAFD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 6.1x BCAL's $233M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$499M$233M$643M$445M$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$191M$92M$294M$110M$277M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$134M$63M$209M$76M$243M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$167M$57M$217M$204M$226M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.0%+79.4%+79.9%+57.5%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+38.0%+37.8%+43.8%+24.3%+20.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+26.8%+27.1%+32.5%+17.1%+16.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+33.4%+24.4%+33.8%+45.8%+14.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.0%-2.0%+11.1%+20.7%+46.3%
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PFBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.1x trailing earnings, PFBC trades at a 33% valuation discount to WAFD's 13.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCAL offers better value at 0.31x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$613M$2.8B$908M$2.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$730M$633M$3.7B$976M$3.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.10x9.88x13.49x12.10x13.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.91x11.42x14.24x9.61x10.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x0.31x4.25x0.95x4.41x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.85x7.19x13.02x8.59x12.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.31x2.63x4.33x2.04x1.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.54x1.08x1.21x1.15x0.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF6.92x10.77x12.81x4.46x13.09x
PFBC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

PFBC delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. BCAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.3%+11.4%+9.3%+9.8%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.8%+1.6%+1.4%+1.0%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.5%+10.6%+6.8%+7.4%+3.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.4%+5.0%+9.3%+2.5%+5.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967697
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.49x0.12x0.43x0.35x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$423M$20M$883M$68M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$807M$52M$108M$213M$657M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$384M$72M$991M$280M$1.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.88x1.55x2.12x0.62x0.48x
PFBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HAFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HAFC five years ago would be worth $16,465 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,217 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, HAFC leads with a +36.9% total return vs CVBF's +13.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAFC at 33.4% vs BCAL's 13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.4%+3.3%+10.9%+15.2%+11.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.9%+32.9%+13.1%+36.9%+28.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+126.1%+47.7%+94.0%+137.2%+51.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+56.6%+42.7%+12.2%+64.7%+22.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+256.1%+133.6%+67.6%+76.5%+84.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+31.3%+13.9%+24.7%+33.4%+14.9%
HAFC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PFBC and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PFBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs PFBC's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.69x0.90x0.94x0.92x0.81x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$103.05$20.47$21.48$31.27$36.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$79.60$14.07$17.95$21.84$26.31
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.9%+93.2%+95.5%+97.2%+98.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.162.057.964.168.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded102K189K1.6M265K661K
Evenly matched — PFBC and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CVBF and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: PFBC as "Buy", BCAL as "Buy", CVBF as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BCAL's 0.52%.

MetricPFBC logoPFBCPreferred BankBCAL logoBCALSouthern Californ…CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…HAFC logoHAFCHanmi Financial C…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$102.00$22.00$24.75$35.00$35.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts103161111
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.1%+0.5%+4.0%+3.6%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises51457
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.98$0.10$0.82$1.09$1.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+8.1%+1.0%+2.9%+1.0%+3.7%
Evenly matched — CVBF and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

PFBC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CVBF leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallPreferred Bank (PFBC)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PFBC vs BCAL vs CVBF vs HAFC vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the stronger pick with 26.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). Preferred Bank (PFBC) offers the better valuation at 9. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Preferred Bank (PFBC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD?

On trailing P/E, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the cheapest at 9.

1x versus WaFd, Inc. at 13. 6x. On forward P/E, Preferred Bank is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Southern California Bancorp wins at 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD?

Over the past 5 years, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) delivered a total return of +64.

7%, compared to +12. 2% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFBC returned +256. 1% versus CVBF's +67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

69β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning CVBF is approximately 35% more volatile than PFBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is pulling ahead at 26.

2% versus -4. 1% for Preferred Bank (PFBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern California Bancorp grew EPS 777. 3% year-over-year, compared to 5. 2% for WaFd, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD?

CVB Financial Corp.

(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Southern California Bancorp (BCAL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Preferred Bank (PFBC) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for CVB Financial Corp. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 20. 7% to $24. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 5% for Southern California Bancorp (BCAL).

09

Is PFBC or BCAL or CVBF or HAFC or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Preferred Bank (PFBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

69), 3. 1% yield, +256. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PFBC: +256. 1%, CVBF: +67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PFBC and BCAL and CVBF and HAFC and WAFD?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PFBC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BCAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PFBC

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BCAL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CVBF

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 19%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HAFC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WAFD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PFBC and BCAL and CVBF and HAFC and WAFD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PFBC: -4.1% · BCAL: 26.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(PFBC: 26.8% · BCAL: 27.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PFBC: 9.1x · BCAL: 9.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.