Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $7M | $2.18B | $39.48B | $10.92B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2.18B | $4.29B | $622M | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $65M | $577M | $-301M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | — | 34.4% | 80.9% | 85.1% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | -1.9% | 17.5% | -35.7% | -6.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.9x | 44.2x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.04B | $1.28B | $366M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $801M | $1.66B | $227M | $155M |
PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phio Pharmaceutical… (PHIO) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT) | 100 | 13.7 | -86.3% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
| Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR) | 100 | 241.8 | +141.8% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PHIO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.59, current ratio 49.37x
SRPT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
ALNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.71
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 2.76x
- 13.5% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
- Beta 0.71 vs NTLA's 2.37
ARWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
- 232.6% revenue growth vs SRPT's 15.6%
- +496.9% vs PHIO's -44.1%
Among these 5 stocks, NTLA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 232.6% revenue growth vs SRPT's 15.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs NTLA's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs NTLA's 2.37 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +496.9% vs PHIO's -44.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs PHIO's -75.8% |
PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARWR leads 1 • PHIO leads 0 • SRPT leads 0 • NTLA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and PHIO operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALNY is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.1%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2.2B | $4.3B | $622M | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$6M | $677M | -$203M | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $65M | $577M | -$301M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $107M | $641M | -$51M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +34.4% | +80.9% | +85.1% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -1.9% | +17.5% | -35.7% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +3.0% | +13.5% | -48.4% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.9% | +15.0% | -8.2% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -1.9% | +96.4% | -86.4% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +71.4% | +162.6% | +4.4% | -133.8% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SRPT and ARWR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ALNY's 70.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ARWR's 90.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $2.2B | $39.5B | $10.9B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$14M | $2.4B | $39.1B | $11.1B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.79x | -2.92x | 127.00x | -6389.34x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.93x | 44.18x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 70.17x | 90.41x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.99x | 10.63x | 13.16x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.34x | 1.91x | 50.50x | 20.71x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 84.84x | 69.58x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $-86 for PHIO. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALNY's 1.62x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs PHIO's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -86.4% | +4.9% | +98.3% | -55.5% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -75.8% | +1.9% | +11.8% | -18.1% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -31.4% | +33.4% | +9.3% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -24.0% | +15.3% | +8.8% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.91x | 1.62x | 0.73x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $238M | -$379M | $140M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $801M | $1.7B | $227M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.0B | $1.3B | $366M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.00x | 2.02x | -1.03x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for PHIO. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs PHIO's -44.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 24.4% vs PHIO's -68.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | -2.4% | -26.1% | +15.0% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.1% | -43.4% | +7.0% | +496.9% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.8% | -83.6% | +40.9% | +92.7% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -72.1% | +125.4% | +17.4% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +18.0% | +411.9% | +1253.3% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -68.3% | -45.3% | +12.1% | +24.4% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALNY and ARWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs PHIO's 27.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 2.02x | 0.71x | 1.81x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.19 | $44.14 | $495.55 | $79.48 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $10.42 | $245.96 | $12.44 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.2% | +47.1% | +59.7% | +98.1% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 63.4 | 43.8 | 69.7 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 264K | 3.0M | 1.1M | 1.9M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SRPT as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", ARWR as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.3% upside for NTLA (target: $21) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.63 | $445.67 | $81.22 | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 54 | 52 | 20 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALNY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARWR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PHIO vs SRPT vs ALNY vs ARWR vs NTLA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 6% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) offers the better valuation at 127. 0x trailing P/E (44. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA?
On forward P/E, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Phio Pharmaceuticals Corp. (PHIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus PHIO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 235% more volatile than ALNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 162% for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus 15. 6% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (SRPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA?
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALNY leads at 13. 5% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
(SRPT) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 37. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NTLA: 52. 3% to $20. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PHIO or SRPT or ALNY or ARWR or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +411. 9% 10Y return). Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALNY: +411. 9%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PHIO and SRPT and ALNY and ARWR and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PHIO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.