Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Specialty Retail
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Retail
PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Auto - Dealerships | Specialty Retail | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $666K | $250M | $340.44B | $48.92B | $46.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $3.46B | $1.01T | $130.46B | $1.30T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-178M | $123.35B | $9.00B | $32.20B |
| Gross Margin | 34.7% | 13.6% | 41.2% | 44.7% | 12.7% |
| Operating Margin | -43.3% | 7.3% | 10.9% | -2.6% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.7x | 4.1x | 2.6x | 1.4x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $170M | $248.49B | $79.32B | $89.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $1.29B | $181.73B | $24.83B | $108.35B |
PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Powell Max Limited … (PMAX) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| Cango Inc. (CANG) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 132.8 | +32.8% |
| JD.com, Inc. (JD) | 100 | 75.5 | -24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PMAX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CANG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BABA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 83.4% 10Y total return vs BIDU's -17.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 22.8%, current ratio 1.54x
- 12.2% margin vs PMAX's -41.6%
- 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
BIDU ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs JD's 0.05
- +61.3% vs PMAX's -85.9%
JD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 2.6%
- Rev growth 6.8%, EPS growth 76.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.8%
- Beta 1.06, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.29x
- 6.8% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.8% revenue growth vs CANG's -52.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 4.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs PMAX's -41.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs CANG's 2.25 | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs JD's 2.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs PMAX's -85.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs PMAX's -80.7% |
PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories
PMAX leads 1 • CANG leads 0 • BIDU leads 0 • JD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CANG and BABA each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.30T annually — 15452.8x PMAX's $84M. BABA is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PMAX's -41.6%. On growth, CANG holds the edge at +58.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $3.5B | $1.01T | $130.5B | $1.30T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $333M | $114.6B | $4.9B | $23.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | -$178M | $123.4B | $9.0B | $32.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $0 | $2.6B | -$15.7B | $9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.7% | +13.6% | +41.2% | +44.7% | +12.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.3% | +7.3% | +10.9% | -2.6% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -41.6% | -5.2% | +12.2% | +6.9% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -154.0% | +0.3% | -12.0% | +0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.2% | +58.3% | +4.8% | -7.1% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.0% | +3.6% | -52.0% | -2.6% | -56.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PMAX leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.7x trailing earnings, CANG trades at a 68% valuation discount to BABA's 17.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs JD's 0.29x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $666,120 | $250M | $340.4B | $48.9B | $46.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $85M | $350.3B | $56.9B | $43.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.27x | 5.66x | 17.90x | 14.44x | 7.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.13x | 2.58x | 1.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x | 0.29x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.13x | 13.55x | 10.79x | 6.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 2.12x | 2.33x | 2.50x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 0.42x | 2.12x | 1.17x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 29.64x | 25.41x | 7.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BABA delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-5 for PMAX. CANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PMAX's 0.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs PMAX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.9% | -4.1% | +11.2% | +3.1% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -80.7% | -2.3% | +6.7% | +2.0% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.6% | +9.6% | +4.8% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +4.5% | +10.4% | +6.3% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.94x | 0.04x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | -$1.1B | $66.8B | $54.5B | -$18.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $1.3B | $181.7B | $24.8B | $108.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $170M | $248.5B | $79.3B | $89.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -90.56x | -1.87x | 15.74x | 9.71x | 12.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CANG five years ago would be worth $8,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $131 for PMAX. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs PMAX's -85.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 20.5% vs PMAX's -76.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -78.9% | -62.0% | -9.5% | -6.9% | +5.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.9% | -73.7% | +16.0% | +61.3% | -7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +1.2% | +74.8% | +14.2% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -14.2% | -35.4% | -27.0% | -53.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -44.9% | +83.4% | -17.5% | +48.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.4% | +0.4% | +20.5% | +4.5% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BIDU and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CANG's 2.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIDU currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs PMAX's 4.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.72x | 2.25x | 1.21x | 1.41x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $89.60 | $2.88 | $192.67 | $165.30 | $38.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.90 | $0.33 | $103.71 | $81.17 | $24.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.7% | +18.6% | +73.2% | +84.6% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.5 | 58.6 | 61.8 | 69.1 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 1.3M | 10.4M | 2.0M | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CANG and JD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CANG as "Buy", BABA as "Buy", BIDU as "Buy", JD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.2% upside for CANG (target: $3) vs 8.8% for JD (target: $33). For income investors, JD offers the higher dividend yield at 2.61% vs BABA's 1.27%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $3.00 | $194.23 | $154.70 | $32.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 59 | 53 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.3% | — | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $12.14 | — | $5.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.3% | +3.8% | +1.9% | +8.2% |
BABA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PMAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
PMAX vs CANG vs BABA vs BIDU vs JD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger pick with 6. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). Cango Inc. (CANG) offers the better valuation at 5. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cango Inc. (CANG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD?
On trailing P/E, Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the cheapest at 5. 7x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 17. 9x. On forward P/E, JD. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus JD. com, Inc. 's 0. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD?
Over the past 5 years, Cango Inc.
(CANG) delivered a total return of -14. 2%, compared to -98. 7% for Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (PMAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +83. 4% versus PMAX's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Cango Inc. 's 2. 25β — meaning CANG is approximately 112% more volatile than JD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 94% for Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is pulling ahead at 6. 8% versus -52. 7% for Cango Inc. (CANG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cango Inc. grew EPS 960. 0% year-over-year, compared to -350. 8% for Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, JD leads at 6. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD?
Cango Inc.
(CANG) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 3% net margin versus -49. 6% for Powell Max Limited Class A Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 37. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CANG leads at 22. 2% versus -49. 3% for PMAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CANG leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus JD. com, Inc. 's 0. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JD. com, Inc. (JD) trades at 1. 4x forward P/E versus 4. 1x for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CANG: 459. 2% to $3. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD?
In this comparison, JD (2.
6% yield), BABA (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. PMAX, CANG, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PMAX or CANG or BABA or BIDU or JD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JD.
com, Inc. (JD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), 2. 6% yield). Cango Inc. (CANG) carries a higher beta of 2. 25 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JD: +48. 7%, CANG: -44. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PMAX and CANG and BABA and BIDU and JD?
These companies operate in different sectors (PMAX (Industrials) and CANG (Consumer Cyclical) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical) and BIDU (Communication Services) and JD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PMAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CANG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BABA is a large-cap deep-value stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; JD is a mid-cap deep-value stock. BABA, JD pay a dividend while PMAX, CANG, BIDU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.