Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $803M | $119.19B | $25.72B | $13.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.24B | $69.25B | $19.12B | $12.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-305M | $2.45B | $3.60B | $852M |
| Gross Margin | 99.2% | 47.3% | 51.0% | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | 33.9% | 3.3% | 24.2% | 8.6% |
| Forward P/E | 25.9x | 9.8x | 8.0x | 8.2x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $51.00B | $15.18B | $21.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $57.43B | $14.97B | $10.03B |
PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| Synchrony Financial (SYF) | 100 | 363.3 | +263.3% |
| Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) | 100 | 251.1 | +151.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRAA is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 18.4% vs ALLY's 2.7%
- +57.2% vs COF's +4.7%
COF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.58, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth -65.2%
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7%
- 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
SYF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 8.2x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7%
ALLY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 209.6% 10Y total return vs COF's 205.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 0.90x
- Beta 1.42 vs PRAA's 1.82
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs ALLY's -25.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 8.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.42 vs PRAA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SYF's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.2% vs COF's +4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% |
PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRAA leads 1 • ALLY leads 1 • COF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PRAA and SYF each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 55.8x PRAA's $1.2B. SYF is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $69.3B | $19.1B | $12.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $431M | $7.5B | $4.9B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$305M | $2.5B | $3.6B | $852M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$90M | $27.7B | $9.8B | -$295M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.2% | +47.3% | +51.0% | +52.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +3.3% | +24.2% | +8.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +3.5% | +18.6% | +7.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.3% | +37.7% | +51.5% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +22.1% | +20.1% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PRAA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, SYF trades at a 83% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COF's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $803M | $119.2B | $25.7B | $13.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $731M | $112.8B | $25.9B | $25.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.68x | 47.77x | 7.97x | 18.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.94x | 9.76x | 7.99x | 8.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.69x | 14.95x | 5.05x | 12.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.65x | 1.72x | 1.35x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 0.92x | 1.58x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.56x | 2.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYF delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALLY's 1.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SYF scores 7/9 vs ALLY's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -26.0% | +2.4% | +21.4% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +1.3% | +10.8% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.7% | +1.4% | +12.3% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.45x | 0.91x | 1.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$72M | -$6.4B | $209M | $11.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $57.4B | $15.0B | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $51.0B | $15.2B | $21.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.06x | 0.14x | 1.13x | 0.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SYF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SYF five years ago would be worth $17,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,317 for PRAA. Over the past 12 months, PRAA leads with a +57.2% total return vs COF's +4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SYF at 41.3% vs PRAA's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.5% | -22.0% | -11.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.2% | +4.7% | +39.9% | +38.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.3% | +124.7% | +181.9% | +89.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.8% | +30.2% | +72.2% | -8.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.2% | +205.6% | +176.3% | +209.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -15.3% | +31.0% | +41.3% | +23.7% |
Risk & Volatility
ALLY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALLY is the less volatile stock with a 1.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALLY currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs COF's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.58x | 1.52x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.55 | $259.64 | $88.77 | $47.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.25 | $174.98 | $53.23 | $32.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +74.2% | +83.4% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 50.3 | 54.3 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 449K | 4.6M | 3.6M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COF and SYF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRAA as "Hold", COF as "Buy", SYF as "Buy", ALLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 21.8% for ALLY (target: $53). For income investors, COF offers the higher dividend yield at 1.70% vs SYF's 1.61%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $267.18 | $90.55 | $53.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 56 | 41 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.27 | $1.19 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +3.4% | +11.4% | 0.0% |
SYF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PRAA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PRAA vs COF vs SYF vs ALLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) a "Buy" — based on 56 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY?
On trailing P/E, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the cheapest at 8.
0x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Synchrony Financial is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY?
Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.
2%, compared to -46. 8% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALLY returned +209. 6% versus PRAA's -32. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ally Financial Inc.
(ALLY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 42β versus PRA Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning PRAA is approximately 28% more volatile than ALLY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 140% for Ally Financial Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -25. 7% for Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ally Financial Inc. grew EPS 31. 7% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY?
Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
6% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAA leads at 33. 9% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Synchrony Financial (SYF) trades at 8.
0x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for PRA Group, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY?
In this comparison, COF (1.
7% yield), SYF (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PRAA, ALLY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRAA or COF or SYF or ALLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield, +176. 3% 10Y return). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SYF: +176. 3%, PRAA: -32. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRAA and COF and SYF and ALLY?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ALLY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. COF, SYF pay a dividend while PRAA, ALLY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.