Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Financial - Credit Services
PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.43B | $3.36B | $22.44B | $852M | $5.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.52B | $450M | $3.20B | $544M | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $148M | $148M | $382M | $66M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 82.7% | 85.4% | 62.6% | 96.2% | 98.7% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 39.3% | 10.2% | 34.2% | 47.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.8x | 18.9x | 62.5x | 5.5x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $609M | $141M | $7.85B | $333M | $6.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $309M | $64M | $1.35B | $49M | $501M |
PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) | 100 | 77.0 | -23.0% |
| Sezzle Inc. (SEZL) | 100 | 169.0 | +69.0% |
| Affirm Holdings, In… (AFRM) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.7% |
| OppFi Inc. (OPFI) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Credit Acceptance C… (CACC) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.37, yield 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 81.6%, current ratio 11.22x
- Beta 1.37, yield 1.4%, current ratio 11.22x
- Beta 1.37 vs AFRM's 2.72, lower leverage
SEZL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs CACC's 184.8%
- 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRG's -2.2%
- 29.6% margin vs PRG's 5.9%
- +89.2% vs OPFI's -8.8%
AFRM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 109.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.7%
OPFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 62.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, CACC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.1% NII/revenue growth vs PRG's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 62.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs PRG's 5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.37 vs AFRM's 2.72, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs OPFI's 24.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.2% vs OPFI's -8.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 37.7% ROA vs AFRM's 3.1%, ROIC 52.7% vs -0.7% |
PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEZL leads in 2 of 6 categories
PRG leads 0 • AFRM leads 0 • OPFI leads 0 • CACC leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — OPFI and CACC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AFRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 7.1x SEZL's $450M. SEZL is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRG's 5.9%. On growth, PRG holds the edge at +8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $450M | $3.2B | $544M | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $197M | $533M | $190M | $579M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $148M | $148M | $382M | $66M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $238M | $787M | $399M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.7% | +85.4% | +62.6% | +96.2% | +98.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +39.3% | +10.2% | +34.2% | +47.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +29.6% | +11.9% | +12.1% | +18.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +46.3% | +24.6% | +73.2% | +45.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | — | -65.8% | -37.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.0% | +47.0% | — | +2.2% | +43.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRG and OPFI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, PRG trades at a 98% valuation discount to AFRM's 449.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AFRM's 210.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $3.4B | $22.4B | $852M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.7B | $3.4B | $28.9B | $1.1B | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.94x | 26.83x | 449.07x | 9.99x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.82x | 18.93x | 62.49x | 5.51x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.93x | 19.27x | 209.99x | 5.72x | 9.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.59x | 7.45x | 6.96x | 1.43x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.95x | 21.01x | 7.48x | 0.85x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.40x | 16.11x | 37.29x | 2.23x | 5.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEZL delivers a 90.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $91 in annual profit, vs $11 for AFRM. PRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CACC's 4.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SEZL scores 9/9 vs OPFI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.5% | +90.9% | +11.2% | +23.1% | +29.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +37.7% | +3.1% | +9.2% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.8% | +52.7% | -0.7% | +26.4% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.7% | +70.3% | -0.9% | +30.9% | +14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.82x | 0.83x | 2.56x | 1.08x | 4.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $301M | $77M | $6.5B | $283M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $309M | $64M | $1.4B | $49M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $609M | $141M | $7.9B | $333M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.12x | 23.74x | 1.88x | 3.70x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SEZL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SEZL five years ago would be worth $21,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,598 for PRG. Over the past 12 months, SEZL leads with a +89.2% total return vs OPFI's -8.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SEZL at 2.1% vs CACC's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.0% | +53.2% | -9.0% | -4.0% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +89.2% | +30.7% | -8.8% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.5% | +2962.0% | +464.2% | +405.4% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | +117.4% | +24.7% | +1.3% | +23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.0% | +687.8% | -30.7% | +4.2% | +184.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.4% | +2.1% | +78.0% | +71.6% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRG and CACC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRG is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AFRM's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CACC currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs SEZL's 53.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 2.12x | 2.61x | 1.57x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.14 | $186.74 | $100.00 | $15.03 | $565.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.80 | $49.50 | $42.09 | $7.36 | $401.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +53.5% | +67.4% | +65.8% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 61.9 | 63.1 | 74.6 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 499K | 808K | 5.3M | 487K | 179K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRG and OPFI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRG as "Buy", SEZL as "Buy", AFRM as "Buy", OPFI as "Buy", CACC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.9% upside for AFRM (target: $81) vs -26.7% for OPFI (target: $7). For income investors, OPFI offers the higher dividend yield at 24.76% vs PRG's 1.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.50 | $85.00 | $80.77 | $7.25 | $540.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 6 | 33 | 5 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | — | +24.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | — | — | $2.45 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.9% | +1.1% | +1.8% | 0.0% |
SEZL leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
PRG vs SEZL vs AFRM vs OPFI vs CACC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the stronger pick with 66. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC?
On trailing P/E, PROG Holdings, Inc.
(PRG) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. at 449. 1x. On forward P/E, OppFi Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC?
Over the past 5 years, Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) delivered a total return of +117. 4%, compared to -34. 0% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SEZL returned +660. 4% versus AFRM's -34. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PROG Holdings, Inc.
(PRG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 37β versus Affirm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 61β — meaning AFRM is approximately 91% more volatile than PRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 82% versus 4% for Credit Acceptance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is pulling ahead at 66. 1% versus -2. 2% for PROG Holdings, Inc. (PRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OppFi Inc. grew EPS 175. 0% year-over-year, compared to -20. 8% for PROG Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AFRM leads at 33. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC?
Sezzle Inc.
(SEZL) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 6% net margin versus 1. 6% for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CACC leads at 47. 6% versus -2. 7% for AFRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CACC leads at 98. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, OppFi Inc.
(OPFI) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Affirm Holdings, Inc. — 57. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AFRM: 19. 9% to $80. 77.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC?
In this comparison, OPFI (24.
8% yield), PRG (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SEZL, AFRM, CACC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PRG or SEZL or AFRM or OPFI or CACC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PROG Holdings, Inc.
(PRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 4% yield). Affirm Holdings, Inc. (AFRM) carries a higher beta of 2. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRG: +48. 5%, AFRM: -34. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRG and SEZL and AFRM and OPFI and CACC?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRG (Industrials) and SEZL (Financial Services) and AFRM (Technology) and OPFI (Technology) and CACC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRG is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEZL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AFRM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CACC is a small-cap deep-value stock. PRG, OPFI pay a dividend while SEZL, AFRM, CACC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.