Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $761M | $4.78T | $1.56T | $11.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $422.57B | $214.96B | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-30M | $160.21B | $70.59B | $433M |
| Gross Margin | 10.5% | 60.4% | 81.9% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 32.7% | 41.2% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 32.5x | 20.4x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $59.29B | $83.90B | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $30.71B | $35.87B | $658M |
QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) | 100 | 131.8 | +31.8% |
| Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) | 100 | 553.3 | +453.3% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QNST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 78.3%, EPS growth 114.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.4%
- 78.3% revenue growth vs GOOG's 15.1%
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 21.2x)
GOOG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.23, yield 0.2%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs META's 421.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
- PEG 1.09 vs TTD's 1.61
META is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.59, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.60x
- 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
TTD is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.06 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 78.3% revenue growth vs GOOG's 15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 37.9% margin vs QNST's -2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs META's 1.59, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs GOOG's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +159.3% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs QNST's -5.9%, ROIC 25.1% vs 2.8% |
QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
META leads in 2 of 6 categories
QNST leads 1 • GOOG leads 1 • TTD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOOG is the larger business by revenue, generating $422.6B annually — 357.5x QNST's $1.2B. GOOG is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QNST's -2.6%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $422.6B | $215.0B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $161.3B | $109.3B | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$30M | $160.2B | $70.6B | $433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $99M | $73.3B | $48.3B | $837M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +60.4% | +81.9% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +32.7% | +41.2% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +37.9% | +32.8% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +17.3% | +22.4% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.3% | +21.8% | +33.1% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.4% | +81.9% | +62.4% | -20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QNST leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.8x trailing earnings, TTD trades at a 84% valuation discount to QNST's 165.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOG offers better value at 1.23x vs TTD's 1.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $761M | $4.78T | $1.56T | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $671M | $4.81T | $1.61T | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 165.55x | 36.57x | 26.26x | 25.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.47x | 32.45x | 20.36x | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.23x | 1.43x | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.84x | 32.01x | 15.81x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 11.87x | 7.78x | 3.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.19x | 11.64x | 7.31x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.18x | 65.27x | 33.90x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — QNST and GOOG each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOG delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-11 for QNST. QNST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to META's 0.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QNST scores 8/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.1% | +39.0% | +33.2% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | +27.4% | +20.8% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.8% | +25.1% | +27.6% | +21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +30.3% | +29.4% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.14x | 0.39x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$91M | $28.6B | $48.0B | -$222M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $30.7B | $35.9B | $658M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $59.3B | $83.9B | $436M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.64x | 392.15x | 78.84x | 1591.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GOOG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GOOG five years ago would be worth $33,098 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,552 for TTD. Over the past 12 months, GOOG leads with a +159.3% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOG at 54.2% vs TTD's -28.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.1% | +25.4% | -5.1% | -37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.9% | +159.3% | +3.7% | -58.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.0% | +266.7% | +166.4% | -63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.4% | +231.0% | +94.8% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +288.4% | +1013.4% | +421.2% | +680.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.9% | +54.2% | +38.6% | -28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GOOG and TTD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTD is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than META's 1.59 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOG currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.23x | 1.59x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.41 | $397.28 | $796.25 | $91.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.29 | $149.49 | $520.26 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.6% | +99.5% | +77.5% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 82.8 | 42.8 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 673K | 19.1M | 15.6M | 20.4M |
Analyst Outlook
META leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QNST as "Buy", GOOG as "Buy", META as "Buy", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs -3.0% for GOOG (target: $383). For income investors, META offers the higher dividend yield at 0.34% vs GOOG's 0.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $383.41 | $821.80 | $37.12 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 79 | 60 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.82 | $2.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.7% | +12.3% |
META leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). QNST leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
QNST vs GOOG vs META vs TTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNST or GOOG or META or TTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is the stronger pick with 78. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOG). The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QNST or GOOG or META or TTD?
On trailing P/E, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus QuinStreet, Inc. at 165. 6x. On forward P/E, QuinStreet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 1. 09x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. 's 1. 61x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QNST or GOOG or META or TTD?
Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) delivered a total return of +231. 0%, compared to -64. 5% for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GOOG returned +1013% versus QNST's +288. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QNST or GOOG or META or TTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Meta Platforms, Inc. 's 1. 59β — meaning META is approximately 50% more volatile than TTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 39% for Meta Platforms, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QNST or GOOG or META or TTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QuinStreet, Inc.
(QNST) is pulling ahead at 78. 3% versus 15. 1% for Alphabet Inc. (GOOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: QuinStreet, Inc. grew EPS 114. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Meta Platforms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QNST leads at 23. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QNST or GOOG or META or TTD?
Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 0. 4% for QuinStreet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus 0. 6% for QNST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QNST or GOOG or META or TTD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 09x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. 's 1. 61x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, QuinStreet, Inc. (QNST) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 32. 5x for Alphabet Inc. — 22. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.
08Which pays a better dividend — QNST or GOOG or META or TTD?
In this comparison, META (0.
3% yield), GOOG (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. QNST, TTD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QNST or GOOG or META or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alphabet Inc.
(GOOG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23), +1013% 10Y return). Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GOOG: +1013%, META: +421. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QNST and GOOG and META and TTD?
These companies operate in different sectors (QNST (Communication Services) and GOOG (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.