Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Banks - Regional
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application | Banks - Regional | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $3.17B | $2.11B | $699M | $1.87B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $822M | $586M | $315M | $472M | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $74M | $-22M | $69M | $-50M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 60.1% | 69.6% | 57.4% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.2% | -0.8% | 25.8% | -9.3% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.0x | 19.6x | 9.6x | 21.7x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $346M | $237M | $117M | $354M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $368M | $121M | $52M | $63M | $102M |
QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) | 100 | 48.7 | -51.3% |
| nCino, Inc. (NCNO) | 100 | 27.2 | -72.8% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 144.1 | +44.1% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 36.5 | -63.5% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 89.7 | -10.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QTWO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 225.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
Among these 5 stocks, NCNO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IBCP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs QTWO's 103.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- PEG 1.82 vs JKHY's 2.16
ALKT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 32.9% revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and efficiency is your priority.
- Beta 0.28 vs ALKT's 1.30
- 17.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs -8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 21.8x), PEG 1.82 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.7% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs ALKT's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.6% vs ALKT's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 21.0% vs -8.6% |
QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
JKHY leads 1 • QTWO leads 0 • NCNO leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IBCP and JKHY each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 8.0x IBCP's $315M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, ALKT holds the edge at +28.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $822M | $586M | $315M | $472M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $115M | $27M | $89M | -$12M | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $74M | -$22M | $69M | -$50M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $196M | $60M | $70M | $44M | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +60.1% | +69.6% | +57.4% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | -0.8% | +25.8% | -9.3% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | -3.7% | +21.7% | -10.6% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +10.2% | +22.2% | +9.4% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.1% | +9.6% | — | +28.9% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.7% | +2.3% | +2.3% | -22.7% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 84% valuation discount to QTWO's 63.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBCP offers better value at 1.97x vs JKHY's 2.32x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $2.1B | $699M | $1.9B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $2.2B | $764M | $2.2B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 63.36x | -53.88x | 10.38x | -37.89x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.05x | 19.64x | 9.56x | 21.69x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.97x | — | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.39x | 121.97x | 9.39x | — | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.99x | 3.89x | 2.22x | 4.20x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.99x | 1.87x | 1.41x | 5.00x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.30x | 39.45x | 9.96x | 45.09x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. NCNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.9% | -2.1% | +14.2% | -14.0% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | -1.4% | +1.3% | -5.9% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.1% | -1.2% | +10.2% | -8.6% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | -1.5% | +2.6% | -9.3% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.22x | 0.23x | 0.98x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$22M | $116M | $65M | $290M | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $368M | $121M | $52M | $63M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $346M | $237M | $117M | $354M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 15.31x | -0.51x | 0.91x | -3.73x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,144 for NCNO. Over the past 12 months, IBCP leads with a +12.6% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs NCNO's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.0% | -27.9% | +7.2% | -23.1% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -36.9% | -22.1% | +12.6% | -37.8% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.4% | -21.0% | +130.6% | +41.1% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.0% | -68.6% | +63.7% | -54.9% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | -80.6% | +184.6% | -59.5% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.9% | -7.6% | +32.1% | +12.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBCP and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALKT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IBCP currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs NCNO's 52.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.18x | 0.83x | 1.30x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $96.68 | $33.92 | $37.39 | $31.66 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $44.65 | $13.80 | $29.63 | $14.11 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.4% | +52.4% | +90.8% | +55.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 50.1 | 50.6 | 50.9 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 929K | 2.7M | 176K | 1.9M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBCP and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QTWO as "Buy", NCNO as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NCNO (target: $32) vs 11.9% for IBCP (target: $38). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.05% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $76.00 | $32.33 | $38.00 | $22.00 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 32 | 23 | 7 | 12 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.0% | — | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 11 | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.03 | — | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). JKHY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
QTWO vs NCNO vs IBCP vs ALKT vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Q2 Holdings, Inc. at 63. 4x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Independent Bank Corporation wins at 1. 82x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -68. 6% for nCino, Inc. (NCNO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus NCNO's -80. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Alkami Technology, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning ALKT is approximately 359% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, nCino, Inc. (NCNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Q2 Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKT leads at 29. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 82x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 12. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NCNO: 81. 8% to $32. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY?
In this comparison, IBCP (3.
0% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. QTWO, NCNO, ALKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QTWO or NCNO or IBCP or ALKT or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, ALKT: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QTWO and NCNO and IBCP and ALKT and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (QTWO (Technology) and NCNO (Technology) and IBCP (Financial Services) and ALKT (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: QTWO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCNO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. IBCP, JKHY pay a dividend while QTWO, NCNO, ALKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.