Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.35B | $2.38B | $711M | $3.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $867M | $315M | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $131M | $169M | $69M | $223M |
| Gross Margin | 74.0% | 72.1% | 69.6% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 31.8% | 25.3% | 25.8% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 10.9x | 9.7x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $627M | $327M | $117M | $1.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $220M | $185M | $52M | $205M |
RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Republic Bancorp, I… (RBCAA) | 100 | 241.5 | +141.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 249.8 | +149.8% |
| WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) | 100 | 159.9 | +59.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBCAA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 231.9% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 188.6%
- PEG 1.06 vs WSBC's 1.91
- NIM 4.8% vs WSBC's 2.9%
- PEG 1.06 vs 1.85
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.81, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
WSBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 4.1%
- 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
- 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs RBCAA's 2.2%
- +15.0% vs NBTB's +8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | PEG 1.06 vs 1.85 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs WSBC's 0.96 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs RBCAA's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.0% vs NBTB's +8.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RBCAA leads in 3 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 2 • WSBC leads 1 • NBTB leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBCAA leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.5x IBCP's $315M. RBCAA is the more profitable business, keeping 25.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSBC's 15.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $867M | $315M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $177M | $241M | $89M | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $131M | $169M | $69M | $223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $161M | $225M | $70M | $262M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.0% | +72.1% | +69.6% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.8% | +25.3% | +25.8% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +19.5% | +21.7% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +25.2% | +22.2% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.8% | +39.5% | +2.3% | +24.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 30% valuation discount to WSBC's 15.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RBCAA offers better value at 1.09x vs WSBC's 3.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $2.4B | $711M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $2.5B | $775M | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.67x | 13.69x | 10.56x | 15.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 10.94x | 9.72x | 9.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.09x | 1.95x | 2.01x | 3.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.61x | 10.46x | 9.54x | 15.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 2.74x | 2.25x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 1.22x | 1.43x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.39x | 10.87x | 10.13x | 11.76x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for WSBC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBCAA's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs NBTB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.3% | +9.5% | +14.2% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +1.1% | +1.3% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.6% | +7.9% | +10.2% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.0% | +2.4% | +2.6% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $407M | $142M | $65M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $220M | $185M | $52M | $205M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $627M | $327M | $117M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.60x | 1.05x | 0.91x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RBCAA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBCAA five years ago would be worth $19,154 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,756 for WSBC. Over the past 12 months, WSBC leads with a +15.0% total return vs NBTB's +8.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.8% vs NBTB's 15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | +10.5% | +9.0% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.8% | +8.6% | +11.7% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.4% | +55.7% | +134.2% | +65.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.5% | +33.5% | +68.5% | +7.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +231.9% | +104.0% | +188.6% | +48.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.1% | +15.9% | +32.8% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
RBCAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBCAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSBC's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RBCAA currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs WSBC's 89.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.88x | 0.81x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.25 | $46.92 | $37.39 | $38.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $63.97 | $39.20 | $29.63 | $29.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +97.2% | +92.3% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.1 | 56.2 | 52.0 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 237K | 176K | 586K |
Analyst Outlook
WSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RBCAA as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", WSBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for WSBC (target: $42) vs -34.1% for RBCAA (target: $51). For income investors, WSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs RBCAA's 2.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $51.00 | $46.00 | $38.00 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 10 | 7 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +3.1% | +3.0% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 12 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.71 | $1.43 | $1.03 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.4% | +1.7% | +4.6% |
RBCAA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). IBCP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
RBCAA vs NBTB vs IBCP vs WSBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is the stronger pick with 51. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus WesBanco, Inc. at 15. 2x. On forward P/E, WesBanco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Republic Bancorp, Inc. wins at 1. 06x versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 1. 91x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC?
Over the past 5 years, Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) delivered a total return of +91. 5%, compared to +7. 6% for WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBCAA returned +231. 9% versus WSBC's +48. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning WSBC is approximately 37% more volatile than RBCAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 57% for Republic Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is pulling ahead at 51. 4% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Republic Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 0% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for WesBanco, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC?
Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 2% net margin versus 15. 5% for WesBanco, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBCAA leads at 31. 8% versus 19. 7% for WSBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBCAA leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 06x versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 1. 91x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 4x for Republic Bancorp, Inc. — 1. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSBC: 21. 2% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for Republic Bancorp, Inc. (RBCAA).
09Is RBCAA or NBTB or IBCP or WSBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Republic Bancorp, Inc.
(RBCAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), 2. 2% yield, +231. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBCAA: +231. 9%, WSBC: +48. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RBCAA and NBTB and IBCP and WSBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RBCAA is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.