Luxury Goods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Integrated Freight & Logistics
Specialty Retail
Software - Application
REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Luxury Goods | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Integrated Freight & Logistics | Specialty Retail | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $3.59B | $85.05B | $88.39B | $2.92T | $145.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $723M | $88.33B | $91.93B | $742.78B | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $5.25B | $4.48B | $90.80B | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 73.3% | 18.1% | 24.4% | 50.6% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.9% | 8.6% | 6.5% | 11.5% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 307.7x | 14.1x | 19.0x | 34.8x | 60.9x |
| Total Debt | $463M | $32.29B | $37.42B | $152.99B | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $5.89B | $5.50B | $86.81B | $1.53B |
REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) | 100 | 92.5 | -7.5% |
| United Parcel Servi… (UPS) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
| FedEx Corporation (FDX) | 100 | 287.9 | +187.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 222.1 | +122.1% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.4%, EPS growth 45.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
UPS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 6.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, current ratio 1.22x
- PEG 0.42 vs SHOP's 2.08
- Beta 0.90, yield 6.3%, current ratio 1.22x
FDX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +77.1% vs UPS's +13.5%
AMZN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs SHOP's 41.2%
- 12.2% margin vs REAL's -9.0%
- 11.5% ROA vs REAL's -17.3%
SHOP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 30.1% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs UPS's -2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 60.9x), PEG 0.42 vs 2.08 | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs REAL's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs REAL's 2.95 | |
| Dividends | 6.3% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs FDX's 1.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.1% vs UPS's +13.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs REAL's -17.3% |
REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SHOP leads 1 • REAL leads 0 • FDX leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHOP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1028.0x REAL's $723M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REAL's -9.0%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $723M | $88.3B | $91.9B | $742.8B | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $10.5B | $10.3B | $155.9B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | $5.2B | $4.5B | $90.8B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | $4.5B | $4.4B | -$2.5B | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +18.1% | +24.4% | +50.6% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +8.6% | +6.5% | +11.5% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +5.9% | +4.9% | +12.2% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +5.1% | +4.8% | -0.3% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.5% | -1.6% | +8.3% | +16.6% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.0% | -27.1% | +15.7% | +74.8% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, UPS trades at a 87% valuation discount to SHOP's 118.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UPS offers better value at 0.45x vs SHOP's 4.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $85.1B | $88.4B | $2.92T | $145.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $111.5B | $120.3B | $2.98T | $143.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -18.24x | 15.26x | 22.36x | 37.82x | 118.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 307.69x | 14.13x | 19.01x | 34.77x | 60.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 0.80x | 1.35x | 4.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 430.51x | 9.12x | 11.63x | 20.47x | 95.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.19x | 0.96x | 1.01x | 4.07x | 12.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.23x | 3.25x | 7.14x | 10.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 195.62x | 17.85x | 29.65x | 378.98x | 72.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AMZN and SHOP each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPS delivers a 33.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $33 in annual profit, vs $11 for SHOP. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPS's 1.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs FDX's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +33.0% | +15.8% | +23.3% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -17.3% | +7.3% | +5.0% | +11.5% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +16.1% | +7.7% | +14.7% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -15.0% | +15.3% | +8.3% | +15.3% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.99x | 1.33x | 0.37x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $312M | $26.4B | $31.9B | $66.2B | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $5.9B | $5.5B | $86.8B | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $463M | $32.3B | $37.4B | $153.0B | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.83x | 7.37x | 16.50x | 39.96x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — REAL and FDX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,476 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,439 for REAL. Over the past 12 months, FDX leads with a +77.1% total return vs UPS's +13.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors REAL at 108.4% vs UPS's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.5% | +0.7% | +28.7% | +19.7% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +75.9% | +13.5% | +77.1% | +43.7% | +18.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +805.1% | -31.4% | +70.0% | +156.2% | +73.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.6% | -40.0% | +27.1% | +64.8% | +0.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -57.1% | +44.7% | +153.4% | +697.8% | +4123.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +108.4% | -11.8% | +19.4% | +36.8% | +20.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — UPS and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
UPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REAL's 2.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SHOP's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.95x | 0.90x | 1.03x | 1.51x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.39 | $122.41 | $404.03 | $278.56 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.70 | $82.00 | $213.56 | $185.01 | $88.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.3% | +81.8% | +93.0% | +97.3% | +61.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.3 | 44.0 | 50.1 | 81.1 | 34.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 5.8M | 1.8M | 45.5M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
UPS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REAL as "Buy", UPS as "Hold", FDX as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 47.4% upside for SHOP (target: $165) vs -3.1% for FDX (target: $364). For income investors, UPS offers the higher dividend yield at 6.34% vs FDX's 1.47%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.17 | $115.23 | $364.19 | $306.77 | $164.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 45 | 49 | 94 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +6.3% | +1.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 16 | 4 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.35 | $5.51 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +3.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
UPS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). SHOP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.
REAL vs UPS vs FDX vs AMZN vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus Shopify Inc. at 118. 9x. On forward P/E, United Parcel Service, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Parcel Service, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +64. 8%, compared to -45. 6% for The RealReal, Inc. (REAL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus REAL's -57. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus The RealReal, Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning REAL is approximately 227% more volatile than UPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 199% for United Parcel Service, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -2. 5% for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The RealReal, Inc. grew EPS 45. 2% year-over-year, compared to -39. 4% for Shopify Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -6. 0% for The RealReal, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHOP leads at 12. 7% versus -3. 5% for REAL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REAL leads at 69. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 307. 7x for The RealReal, Inc. — 293. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHOP: 47. 4% to $164. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP?
In this comparison, UPS (6.
3% yield), FDX (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. REAL, AMZN, SHOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is REAL or UPS or FDX or AMZN or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Parcel Service, Inc.
(UPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 6. 3% yield). The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UPS: +44. 7%, REAL: -57. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REAL and UPS and FDX and AMZN and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (REAL (Consumer Cyclical) and UPS (Industrials) and FDX (Industrials) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: REAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; UPS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FDX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. UPS, FDX pay a dividend while REAL, AMZN, SHOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.