REIT - Industrial
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $8.60B | $132.71B | $10.91B | $8.29B | $7.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $996M | $8.74B | $737M | $744M | $864M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $212M | $3.21B | $293M | $342M | $244M |
| Gross Margin | 61.7% | 67.7% | 36.1% | 47.0% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 54.1% | 47.0% | 40.3% | 38.3% | 37.9% |
| Forward P/E | 31.0x | 41.6x | 35.9x | 29.9x | 38.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.50B | $31.49B | $1.75B | $2.57B | $3.29B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $166M | $1.32B | $1M | $78M | $15M |
REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rexford Industrial … (REXR) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 156.2 | +56.2% |
| EastGroup Propertie… (EGP) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| First Industrial Re… (FR) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| STAG Industrial, In… (STAG) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
REXR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 2.81 vs STAG's 18.64
- Beta 0.88, yield 4.9%, current ratio 7.16x
- Lower P/E (31.0x vs 35.9x), PEG 2.81 vs 2.99
- 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FR's 2.8%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +40.7% vs REXR's +12.7%
EGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 4.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 285.4% 10Y total return vs PLD's 265.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 50.1%, current ratio 0.85x
FR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 46.0% margin vs REXR's 21.3%
- 6.1% ROA vs REXR's 1.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.4%
Among these 5 stocks, STAG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (31.0x vs 35.9x), PEG 2.81 vs 2.99 | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs REXR's 21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs REXR's 0.88 | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FR's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.7% vs REXR's +12.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs REXR's 1.6%, ROIC 4.5% vs 2.4% |
REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EGP leads in 2 of 6 categories
FR leads 1 • REXR leads 1 • PLD leads 0 • STAG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 11.9x EGP's $737M. FR is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REXR's 21.3%. On growth, EGP holds the edge at +10.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $996M | $8.7B | $737M | $744M | $864M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $840M | $6.7B | $517M | $477M | $634M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $212M | $3.2B | $293M | $342M | $244M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $209M | $5.2B | $418M | $483M | $443M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.7% | +67.7% | +36.1% | +47.0% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +54.1% | +47.0% | +40.3% | +38.3% | +37.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +21.3% | +36.7% | +39.7% | +46.0% | +28.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +59.3% | +56.7% | +64.9% | +51.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.9% | +8.7% | +10.2% | +9.9% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -24.1% | +55.3% | +2.0% | -34.7% |
Valuation Metrics
REXR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.4x trailing earnings, STAG trades at a 37% valuation discount to REXR's 42.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.30x vs STAG's 12.96x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.6B | $132.7B | $10.9B | $8.3B | $7.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $162.9B | $12.7B | $10.8B | $10.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.13x | 35.64x | 41.67x | 33.43x | 26.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.97x | 41.56x | 35.93x | 29.87x | 37.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.82x | 3.30x | 3.46x | 8.16x | 12.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.14x | 23.28x | 25.10x | 21.87x | 17.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.58x | 16.18x | 15.12x | 11.40x | 8.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 2.32x | 3.10x | 3.00x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 41.24x | 27.02x | 26.94x | 72.14x | 18.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — EGP and FR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $2 for REXR. REXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FR's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EGP scores 6/9 vs STAG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | +5.6% | +8.4% | +12.4% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +3.3% | +5.5% | +6.1% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +3.8% | +4.3% | +4.5% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.8% | +5.6% | +6.1% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.54x | 0.50x | 0.93x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.3B | $30.2B | $1.8B | $2.5B | $3.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $166M | $1.3B | $1M | $78M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $31.5B | $1.8B | $2.6B | $3.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | 5.27x | 8.68x | 4.27x | 3.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EGP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EGP five years ago would be worth $14,790 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,980 for REXR. Over the past 12 months, PLD leads with a +40.7% total return vs REXR's +12.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EGP at 8.6% vs REXR's -10.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.1% | +11.6% | +13.7% | +8.8% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.7% | +40.7% | +26.4% | +32.5% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | +21.3% | +28.2% | +24.3% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.2% | +39.8% | +47.9% | +42.1% | +27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.8% | +265.6% | +285.4% | +206.5% | +150.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | +6.6% | +8.6% | +7.5% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
EGP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EGP is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REXR's 0.88 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EGP currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs REXR's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.73x | 0.52x | 0.68x | 0.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.38 | $145.44 | $203.98 | $64.62 | $39.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.14 | $103.02 | $159.37 | $47.36 | $33.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.6% | +98.3% | +99.5% | +96.8% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.0 | 53.1 | 58.2 | 52.2 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 3.1M | 335K | 925K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — REXR and FR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REXR as "Hold", PLD as "Buy", EGP as "Hold", FR as "Buy", STAG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.0% upside for STAG (target: $46) vs 0.9% for EGP (target: $205). For income investors, REXR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.90% vs PLD's 2.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.50 | $144.43 | $204.73 | $65.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 21 | 42 | 33 | 29 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.9% | +2.6% | +2.8% | +2.8% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 | 7 | 14 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.77 | $3.74 | $5.67 | $1.75 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
EGP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). FR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
REXR vs PLD vs EGP vs FR vs STAG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (38. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Prologis, Inc. (PLD) a "Buy" — based on 42 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG?
On trailing P/E, STAG Industrial, Inc.
(STAG) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. at 42. 1x. On forward P/E, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. wins at 2. 81x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 64x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG?
Over the past 5 years, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) delivered a total return of +47. 9%, compared to -20. 2% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EGP returned +285. 4% versus REXR's +138. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning REXR is approximately 68% more volatile than EGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 93% for First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: STAG Industrial, Inc. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLD leads at 19. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 21. 1% for Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 37. 7% for STAG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REXR leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 81x versus STAG Industrial, Inc. 's 18. 64x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. (FR) trades at 29. 9x forward P/E versus 41. 6x for Prologis, Inc. — 11. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STAG: 18. 0% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Rexford Industrial Realty, Inc. (REXR) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 2. 6% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD).
09Is REXR or PLD or EGP or FR or STAG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, EastGroup Properties, Inc.
(EGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 8% yield, +285. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EGP: +285. 4%, REXR: +138. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between REXR and PLD and EGP and FR and STAG?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: REXR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EGP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STAG is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.