RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$6.96B
5Y Perf.+222.9%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WELL
Welltower Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$149.25B
5Y Perf.+320.4%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
Market Cap$41.15B
5Y Perf.+147.6%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$2.25B
5Y Perf.+13.8%
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
Market Cap$14.89B
5Y Perf.+81.5%
RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RHP | WELL | VTR | PK | HST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $6.96B | $149.25B | $41.15B | $2.25B | $14.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.65B | $11.63B | $6.13B | $2.53B | $6.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $264M | $1.43B | $260M | $-215M | $765M |
| Gross Margin | 17.8% | 39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% | 39.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.2% | 4.4% | 13.4% | 11.1% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 27.5x | 78.4x | 118.0x | 24.4x | 19.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.29B | $21.38B | $13.22B | $4.26B | $5.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $500M | $5.03B | $741M | $232M | $768M |
RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RHP
WELL
VTR
PK
HST
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryman Hospitality P… (RHP) | 100 | 322.9 | +222.9% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 247.6 | +147.6% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Host Hotels & Resor… (HST) | 100 | 181.5 | +81.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HST leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns. WELL and VTR also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
RHP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 3.9%
- Beta 0.98, yield 3.9%, current ratio 73.13x
- 3.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PK's 12.6%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
WELL
Welltower Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
WELL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs RHP's 161.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage
Best for: stability
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
The REIT Holding
Among these 5 stocks, PK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
Best for: real estate exposure
HST
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
HST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (19.8x vs 24.4x)
- 12.5% margin vs PK's -8.5%
- +54.9% vs RHP's +21.7%
- 5.9% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.2%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | WELL | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% |
| Value | HST | Lower P/E (19.8x vs 24.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | HST | 12.5% margin vs PK's -8.5% |
| Stability / Safety | VTR | Beta 0.01 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage |
| Dividends | RHP | 3.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PK's 12.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | HST | +54.9% vs RHP's +21.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HST | 5.9% ROA vs PK's -2.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 2.2% |
RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRHPLAGGINGVTR
Who Leads Where
HST leads in 1 of 6 categories
PK leads 1 • RHP leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓VTRVentas, Inc.
0leads
HSTHost Hotels & Resorts…
1leads
PKPark Hotels & Resorts…
1leads
WELLWelltower Inc.
1leads
RHPRyman Hospitality Pro…
1leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs WELLvs PKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HST2/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PK4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RHP4/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
WELL4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HST leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 4.6x PK's $2.5B. HST is the more profitable business, keeping 12.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PK's -8.5%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RHPRyman Hospitality… | WELLWelltower Inc. | VTRVentas, Inc. | PKPark Hotels & Res… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $11.6B | $6.1B | $2.5B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $799M | $2.8B | $2.3B | $612M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $264M | $1.4B | $260M | -$215M | $765M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $302M | $2.5B | $1.4B | $448M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +39.1% | -4.3% | -4.7% | +39.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +4.4% | +13.4% | +11.1% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | +12.3% | +4.2% | -8.5% | +12.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +21.9% | +22.4% | +17.7% | +14.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.2% | +40.3% | +22.0% | -1.3% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +22.5% | 0.0% | +117.2% | +26.7% |
HST leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.7x trailing earnings, HST trades at a 88% valuation discount to VTR's 160.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PK's 11.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WELL's 66.4x.
| Metric | RHPRyman Hospitality… | WELLWelltower Inc. | VTRVentas, Inc. | PKPark Hotels & Res… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.0B | $149.2B | $41.1B | $2.3B | $14.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.8B | $165.6B | $53.6B | $6.3B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.27x | 153.25x | 160.26x | -7.88x | 19.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.53x | 78.42x | 118.01x | 24.41x | 19.76x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.04x | 66.40x | 24.31x | 11.17x | 12.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.70x | 13.99x | 7.05x | 0.89x | 2.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.01x | 3.35x | 3.18x | 0.72x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.97x | 52.41x | 31.25x | 22.08x | 17.36x |
PK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHP delivers a 23.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-7 for PK. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RHP's 3.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HST scores 8/9 vs PK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RHPRyman Hospitality… | WELLWelltower Inc. | VTRVentas, Inc. | PKPark Hotels & Res… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +23.8% | +3.5% | +2.1% | -6.7% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | +2.3% | +1.0% | -2.6% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.2% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +0.6% | +3.2% | +3.1% | +6.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.54x | 0.49x | 1.05x | 1.38x | 0.84x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.8B | $16.3B | $12.5B | $4.0B | $4.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $500M | $5.0B | $741M | $232M | $768M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $21.4B | $13.2B | $4.3B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.06x | 0.26x | 1.40x | -0.01x | 4.48x |
RHP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,280 for PK. Over the past 12 months, HST leads with a +54.9% total return vs RHP's +21.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs PK's 7.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RHPRyman Hospitality… | WELLWelltower Inc. | VTRVentas, Inc. | PKPark Hotels & Res… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.8% | +14.3% | +12.6% | +6.2% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.7% | +42.7% | +33.9% | +21.9% | +54.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.7% | +189.5% | +94.2% | +23.4% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.1% | +202.3% | +74.8% | -27.2% | +43.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +161.6% | +223.1% | +65.0% | -11.4% | +74.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.6% | +42.5% | +24.8% | +7.2% | +12.2% |
WELL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RHP and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VTR is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RHP currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs PK's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RHPRyman Hospitality… | WELLWelltower Inc. | VTRVentas, Inc. | PKPark Hotels & Res… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.13x | 0.01x | 1.32x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $112.47 | $219.59 | $88.50 | $12.39 | $22.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $83.82 | $142.65 | $61.76 | $9.84 | $14.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +97.0% | +97.8% | +90.3% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.6 | 60.2 | 56.2 | 52.1 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 507K | 2.6M | 3.4M | 3.9M | 8.3M |
Evenly matched — RHP and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RHP and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RHP as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", VTR as "Buy", PK as "Hold", HST as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.3% upside for WELL (target: $227) vs -7.7% for HST (target: $20). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.57% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | RHPRyman Hospitality… | WELLWelltower Inc. | VTRVentas, Inc. | PKPark Hotels & Res… | HSTHost Hotels & Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.20 | $226.50 | $90.80 | $11.50 | $20.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 34 | 32 | 25 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +12.6% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.33 | $2.76 | $1.86 | $1.41 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.0% | +1.4% |
Evenly matched — RHP and PK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
HST leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallRyman Hospitality Propertie… (RHP)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RHP vs WELL vs VTR vs PK vs HST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (HST) offers the better valuation at 19. 7x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
On trailing P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the cheapest at 19. 7x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 3x. On forward P/E, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -27. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus PK's -11. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 13792% more volatile than VTR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -240. 6% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -11. 1% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHP leads at 18. 9% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WELL leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
(HST) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 118. 0x for Ventas, Inc. — 98. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WELL: 6. 3% to $226. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 6%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is RHP or WELL or VTR or PK or HST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ventas, Inc.
(VTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 2. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VTR: +65. 0%, PK: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RHP and WELL and VTR and PK and HST?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RHP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HST is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(RHP: 13.2% · WELL: 40.3%)Net Margin>
%
(RHP: 9.9% · WELL: 12.3%)P/E Ratio<
x
(RHP: 29.3x · WELL: 153.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.